Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Steve Netwriter

2008 Election Shocker! Obama Didn't Win Vote

Recommended Posts

IMPORTANT UPDATE: 9am EST, November 6th, 2008 - The voting counts are now closing in on their final percentages and here is the latest approximate tally based upon a known U.S. voting-age population of 231,229,580 and currently-estimated voter turnout of 133,300,000:

 

97,929,000 - 42.35% - NOTA <<<< WINNER !!!!

63,500,000 - 27.46% - OBAMA <<<< 2nd

55,800,000 - 24.13% - MCCAIN <<<< 3rd

14,000,000 - 06.05% - OTHER

 

Despite being ignored by the national media, the least-known and least-publicized presidential candidate, NOTA, quietly circled his wagons again this year and drew in - at the very last minute in a surprise capitulation - an overwhelming plurality of votes, completely trouncing both big-party, big-money favorites; namely Barack Hussein “ For Change ” Obama and John “ War Hero-Renegade ” McCain. Despite all the focus-group strategizing and labeling and the “comic-book-action-figure- like” packaging mustered around each of them and, despite the prime-time duo's flashy, glitzy, “made-for-TV” campaigns, AMERICA'S TRUE MAJORITY calmly rose above the fray, refusing once again to be swayed or distracted by all the war-paint and shiny wrappers, and steadfastly stood by their preferred representative , NOTA.

 

NOTA - who mounted a surprisingly quiet and stubbornly unorthodox, “off the radar” solo campaign - refrained from choosing a running-mate, shunned participation in any staged and suspicious “TV debates”, and ran wholly without the help or support of any strong-arm lobbyists, self-important “special-interest” groups, religious fervor, corporate influence, party affiliation, and without a single dime of public or private financial support or even using any form of political advertising whatsoever. Despite these long odds, NOTA stepped up to the plate and blasted his one pitch straight out of the park. What many found to be most refreshing was that NOTA ran an “admirably clean and inoffensive” campaign against all of the media-hyped favorites and, quite literally, “stole the whole show and ate the whole sloppy enchilada” in the words of one enlightened (and hungry) observer.

.

.

.

Now that we have the great national distraction of the elections behind us and the facts bear out once again that THERE IS NO REAL REPRESENTATION FOR THE TRUE AMERICAN MAJORITY in Washington, DC, we should open a brand-new national dialogue to discuss what we can do about this critical problem.

 

Click on article for complete details:

 

http://www.marketoracle.net/Article7163.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see the stats to show how many people actually queued up to vote NOTA.

I would imagine it is small

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We dont get NOTA in the UK.

 

But we do get the option of the Monster Raving Loony Party

 

Which IMO is better !!!

 

http://www.omrlp.com/

 

 

And they have re eel policies

 

Hidden amongst the private papers of Marlon Brando has been found the most brilliant plan to make each and every house in Britain independant of the electrics works companies. Brando envisaged a plan to string electric eels round and about the swimming pool and then run cables to the house to electricly power the edifice.Indeed a bold and inovative plan. All that remains is for the M.R.L. to take up his engineering genius and free the British people from slavery to the electric works.Marlon Brando with his scheme to provide free and readily available eel-ectricity to the people,the people who make up humanity! Oh the humanity of Brando! Genius extraordinare.

 

http://www.omrlp.com/index.php?page=eel-ectricity :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not everyone that didn't vote was saying that they didn't like any of the available options.

 

In Spain we have a system were you can go an vote "blank". This will count as None of the parties represent me. Well, when there are elections the results for people that voted blank are never higher than a couple of percent.

 

I reckon out of that 47% around 30%-40% didn't really care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing the maths...

 

Voting-age population of 231,229,580

Currently-estimated voter turnout of 133,300,000

 

63,500,000 - 27.46% - OBAMA

55,800,000 - 24.13% - MCCAIN

14,000,000 - 06.05% - OTHER

= 133,300,000

 

So according to that, NO-ONE voted specifically for "None Of The Above"

97,929,000 - 42.35% - just couldn't be arsed or weren't able to vote

 

Seems like a non-article to me. Over 55% turnout is pretty good these days, isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think sometimes you guys take thinks a little too seriously, and a little too literally :D

Maybe I need a "Steve isn't being totally serious here" smilie :D

 

I think the "Monster Raving Loony Party" suggestion is more the way I was thinking :D

 

There is no NOTA vote in the US. So yes, it's a measure of the number who didn't vote.

But, I did find that article interesting, and thought provoking.

Just think about how many people didn't vote for the winner :unsure:

 

 

It's was interesting today because we had a vote in the New Zealand elections. No doubt you've all heard about them, and have been following them closely :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Interesting because we have PR (proportional representation). The voting paper had a list of people standing for our local area. So we get to vote for a person, and another list of parties to vote for.

That was an amazingly long and varied list

 

It made me realise how much more democratic it felt here, with so many options. Very very different to the UK where it's A or B, and even more different from what I've seen from the US.

 

I love this country.

My wife said "it's our first vote". The guy recording the details said "welcome to New Zealand" :D

 

I must say, today slightly restored my faith in democracy, and has made me slightly less cynical.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's was interesting today because we had a vote in the New Zealand elections. No doubt you've all heard about them, and have been following them closely :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Interesting because we have PR (proportional representation). The voting paper had a list of people standing for our local area. So we get to vote for a person, and another list of parties to vote for.

That was an amazingly long and varied list

 

It made me realise how much more democratic it felt here, with so many options.

 

Steve,

voted myself today... Having lived in Australia for a while I prefer their system of Single Transferable Vote. (STV)

 

With the PR system in NZ voters have no say on the makeup of the list of candidates for a party. Whereas in Australia, if you really don't like someone from a party, you can take pleasure in putting that person last, and all the others above them.

 

And if you really like someone you can put them first. Not enough space or time to fully describe the Australian system. Having lived there and voted there, STV ensures that every so often quality independents get in. Unlike NZ. And once in, if they truly represent their electorate, they tend to keep being elected. Unlike party hacks who have to toe their party line than truly represent their electorate.

 

At least in this election there was the ability to vote for the "Bill & Ben" party. Here follows a response to a question about their cycling policy

 

======== snip from http://www.vorb.org.nz/ftopict-88085.html ========

 

In the interests of us making a more informed discussion this coming general election on Friday the 17th of October Tama sent this e-mail requesting the cycling specific policies of all the major political parties. This is the response from the Bill and Ben Party:

 

The Bill and Ben party loves cyclists, especially the slim fit ladies wearing white lycra on a hot summers day when the sweat turns it ever so slightly see-through and their tight little a………………….. *cough hmmmm back on subject. Cyclists, hmmm, well in our time we have seen many a, um, peddler and we have decided to pursue these points.

Unlike other political parties that promise so much and deliver so little, the Bill and Ben Party promise to promise nothing. And yes, we do realise that by promising no promises we are actually making a promise, but that’s the only promise we’re going to make. We promise.

 

Put the PARTY back into Political Party

Party Vote Bill and Ben

======== end snip ==========================

and from the wikipedia entry

 

===== snip =====

Further details have emerged about the party, which now states that it managed to secure its required five hundred members for Electoral Act registration after locating the requisite number of inebriated university students outside a student drinking establishment.

===== end snip ====

 

And the most appealing part of their party is that if the get 5% then there will be less politicians in parliament!!. There are only Bill & Ben on their list. And if you are not allowed to add members to the list after the election then there will be less members of parliament.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve,

voted myself today... Having lived in Australia for a while I prefer their system of Single Transferable Vote. (STV)

 

With the PR system in NZ voters have no say on the makeup of the list of candidates for a party. Whereas in Australia, if you really don't like someone from a party, you can take pleasure in putting that person last, and all the others above them.

 

And if you really like someone you can put them first. Not enough space or time to fully describe the Australian system. Having lived there and voted there, STV ensures that every so often quality independents get in. Unlike NZ. And once in, if they truly represent their electorate, they tend to keep being elected. Unlike party hacks who have to toe their party line than truly represent their electorate.

 

Interesting.

In the UK I was against the idea of PR. But I am more than willing to change my view, and from what I have seen so far, it seems to me PR isn't such a bad idea. Your description of STV sounds good.

 

After the vote my wife asked me who I voted for. I said, the "Free Fish on Friday" party.

If you think about it, that's quite subtle :D

And could appeal to voters with completely different views :D

 

It's interesting to see the results on TV.

 

It looks like it's a National led coalition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×