Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Mueller's Report Done. Apologies? What Next?

Recommended Posts

Highly-political MUELLER "throws a molitov cocktail"

"Giving the Dems what they want... and refusing to answer questions" -says Mark Levin

D7xx0tmUEAEDkgb.jpg

MUELLER OPENS DOOR TO IMPEACHMENT
SHIFTS BURDEN TO CONGRESS

Leading Democrats remain fearful that impeaching President Donald Trump will bolster his re-election campaign.

But if Robert Mueller’s brief, unexpected statement did anything Wednesday, it clarified that a Democratic Party that does not embrace impeachment still faces a potentially sizable political risk — especially from core supporters demanding more loudly than ever before that the House try to remove Trump from office.

“There is a real danger if Democrats fail to have message clarity and moral clarity when it comes to this,” said Ezra Levin, co-founder of the influential liberal activist group Indivisible. “There will be a real question of how they’ll ever motivate people to vote for them.”

Levin’s warning was emblematic of the response to the former special counsel’s remarks from progressive leaders, many of whom have called for Trump’s impeachment since 2017 but have increased their pressure on congressional Democrats to support it since the release of Mueller’s report in April.

SPECIAL COUNSEL SLAPS PRESIDENT ON WAY OUT...
DID NOT CLEAR HIM OF OBSTRUCTION...
Fuels Impeachment Push...
'The dam has burst'...
PELOSI BALKS...

 

The Mark Levin Show (May 30 2019)

/ 2 /

Tom Fenton has it Right !

Tom Fitton: Robert Mueller needs to be investigated

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THE DEMS ARE DELUSIONAL
 

They seem to be delusional on every single thing... They Pander to try to won votes

On Gender confusion, on Green policy, on Reparations.

And on Impeachment.

Demands that Democrats impeach are relatively new. Activists largely ignored the issue last election cycle, preferring instead to pressure the party to support policy goals like single-payer health care. Many of them were even skeptical that the release of Mueller’s report would change their view.

But the details of the investigation, combined with the widespread belief that Attorney General William Barr acted inappropriately when releasing its findings, has caused those progressives to reconsider. Holding Trump accountable, they say, requires impeachment.

“There comes a point where it’s not going to be politically tenable to stand in the way of this investigation,” said Neil Sroka, spokesman for the liberal group Democracy for America. “We may be reaching that point now or soon.”

Still, doubts linger among Democatic leaders that impeachment is a good idea. They point out that the sweeping success of many of their House candidates in 2018 came after a campaign focused almost entirely on health care and economic issues, not the Russia investigation.

Highlighting those subjects is harder when the public’s attention turns to impeachment, they say.

“It’s hard to get oxygen around something you’re doing to improve people’s lives when there’s talk of impeachment,” said Ohio Democratic Party chairman David Pepper.

. . .

One administration official told McClatchy that the president’s aides see clear electoral benefit in House Democrats proceeding with impeachment—a move they believe would be interpreted by Trump’s base as a “pre-baked political attack” on the president, and only supported by a minority of Americans already guaranteed to vote for Trump’s 2020 opponent.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders echoed that conclusion, but also teased a new line of attack against Democrats should they proceed with the impeachment process. She would not comment on internal deliberations over the prospects of impeachment.

“We’re always prepared, but I don’t think the American people deserve that,” she said. “Every single minute that Congress spends on that we’re not spending on infrastructure, we’re not spending on lower prescription drug prices, we’re not spending on Iran, China, North Korea, new trade deals. Every single thing that they’re doing is taking away from things that could actually help the American people and that’s a great disservice.”

> https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article230956313.html

Let them push ahead, and get their knuckles rapped (or their heads bashed)

They truly deserve it.

The Dems need to get smashed up as a party - just as the Tories got in the UK

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/20/2019 at 12:29 AM, drbubb said:

You LACK HONESTY & DISCERNMENT (counting instances in the BIASED Mueller Report makes no sense)

I just banned you until June 1.

I would have done this before on several occasions (as you may recall)

But Invision changed the way it was done, and I had to rediscover how to do it.

Maybe things will be clearer with the mishandled Clinton investigation by the end of June

well. your time line is finally caught up to mine.

how did that work out for you?

are you still:

or now more:

Now that enough time has passed for you to also read the Mueller report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listen to this...

Legal expert Sidney Powell, totally demolishes the sack human garbage that was once Special Prosecutor

Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Mueller Upends Rule of Law, In Final Appearance—Sidney Powell

Do you still not get it, Sparks?

How many of these scumbags need to go to jail before you admit you got everything wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

4 hours ago, drbubb said:

Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Mueller Upends Rule of Law, In Final Appearance—Sidney Powell

Do you still not get it, Sparks?

How many of these scumbags need to go to jail before you admit you got everything wrong?

Pretty much what I said over a month a go, when you were claiming it was all over iirc. Thats what happens when enough evidence is collected to prove someone guilty.

But less of the tantrum would probably help the conversation along.

On 4/18/2019 at 7:17 PM, mSparks said:

The "fake news" that says it is up to Amerifag congress to decide whether to impeach Trump given the existence of 10 pieces of evidence Trump tried to prevent an investigation which resulted in now convicted criminals who are each now going to serve more time in jail than Jeffrey Epstein.

PedoSee has said she only needed one. And I believe she gets to call the vote.

And neither Mueller nor Barr get to cast a vote in that process should she decide to call it.

How does it feel to have your hopes and dreams in the hands of Nanci PedoSee?

Besides the obvious comedy value for people like me.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Thats what happens when enough evidence is collected to prove someone guilty."

Are you a total idiot, Sparks?

Seems so, since this statement make no sense.  Sidney Powell is on the mark, and my blood boils when I hear what she says about Mueller and team

You are another ideologically corrupted fool, who tries to spin everything in a way that is anti-Trump, without regard to logic or reason,  It is deplorable,

You are nearly as deplorable as the witch, who accuses her opponents of everything she is doing herself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drbubb said:

anti-Trump

since when did truth take sides?

You might as well say im anti sunshine because i point out its a cloudy day. 

Anglo-Amerifag empire is finished. get over it now, or never, not going to change a damn thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mueller's Report ... is FULL OF LIES
(he should now be investigated ... straight into his grave, the scumbag!  Bring it on!)

Dershowitz reacts to new details casting doubt on Mueller report

An utter lying tool, Mueller is being exposed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mSparks said:

since when did truth take sides?

You might as well say im anti sunshine because i point out its a cloudy day. 

Anglo-Amerifag empire is finished. get over it now, or never, not going to change a damn thing.

You are a Fool, Sparks, a non-discerning fool.

Listen to John Dowd - in the video just above

That Mueller cartoon also lacks any discernment about what is really going on, and what was motivating scumbag Mueller.

History will judge him to be a total arse

The following Video cuts much closer to the Truth > the scumbag is totally exposed now

JJ: "The original report did not hurt Trump enough... He does it to rally the Left"

Did Mueller Collude With Dems?, 2687

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, drbubb said:

Mueller's Report ... is FULL OF LIES

obviously. when did a politico ever open their mouth and lies not come out?

going to need more than hollow accusations against Mueller to change direction now though. 

5 hours ago, drbubb said:

History will judge him to be a total arse

perhaps then you could go into Muellers role in the Epstein case/coverup...

Right now he's heading to Ken Starr fame. How well do you remember the Starr report?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, drbubb said:

You are nearly as deplorable as the witch

And, also, seriously, F' you. I'm not the one defending this shit.

190603-george-nader-donald-trump-se-4123

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/russia-probe-witness-arrested-child-porn-charges-n1013416

"Told you so". Another item of the Steele report confirmed.

You need to come to terms with the [supposed to be confidential] steele report not being a fabrication to smeer trump - and get it into your head it was a factual account that explains why he was installed manchurian candidate style to lead the end of the anglo amerifag empire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Defend this:

Mueller Report is unraveling as the Lies and Liars are exposed

(why are pedos like the Pedo-sta's and Nader all around this hoax?)

Despite the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller making it clear that no Americans associated with then-candidate, now-President Donald Trump ever criminally “colluded, conspired, or coordinated” with the Russian government in 2016, there nevertheless remain many on the left who still hold dear to that narrative.

That has become an increasingly difficult task for Trump critics, made all the more tough today following the arrest and indictment of a key witness in Mueller’s probe related to alleged pre-election collusion on the part of a Trump campaign associate.

The Justice Department announced in a thinly-detailed press release on Monday that a 60-year-old Lebanese-American businessman named George Nader had been arrested at John F. Kennedy airport in New York City.

That arrest followed a sealed indictment first filed in January 2018 after Nader had arrived at Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C. from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, while in possession of a cellphone that contained child pornography.

Nader actually pleaded guilty to similar charges in Virginia in 1991. Should he be convicted of the same crime once again, he faces anywhere from a mandatory minimum of 15 years to a maximum of 40 years in federal prison.

Specifically, Nader was said to have helped arrange a January 2017 meeting in Seychelles — a small island off the east coast of Africa in the Indian Ocean — during which Prince met with a Russian reported to have close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. That meeting was viewed by Trump critics as a potential effort to establish back-channel communications between Russia and the incoming Trump administration.

A Business Insider report from March 2018 provided more details on how Nader’s testimony to Mueller about that meeting directly contradicted Prince’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Prince had testified that his meeting with the Russian in Seychelles — sanctioned investment fund manager Kirill Dmitriev, who Prince claimed to not know was sanctioned — occurred purely by chance while he was on the island to meet with Emirati business leaders.

Prince further said the Emiratis had introduced him to the Russian, and that their roughly 30-minute long talk was centered around business purposes and a shared desire for the U.S. and Russia to resume normal trade relations.

Nader, on the other hand, reportedly testified to Mueller’s grand jury that the Emiratis had nothing to do with the meeting between Prince and Dmitriev, that the meeting was specifically about U.S.-Russian relations, and that the meeting had been set-up well in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, drbubb said:

(why are pedos like the Pedo-sta's and Nader all around this hoax?)

Because trump didn't WANT to become president, he was running as a favour to his friends the Clintons and to boost his brand and then tried his best to lose.

1*Po435UOroDLDxhcf2rAFTQ.png

Obviously, could not let an opportunity like that slide.

https://medium.com/@darrenmckeeman/what-the-russians-have-on-trump-b9dac8085d51

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/04/jeffrey-epstein-trump-lawsuit-sex-trafficking-237983

The only "hoax" is the frantic cover up of just how deep the rabbit hole goes and distractions like Pizzagate to try and discredit their actual super happy fun time

Believe it or not mofo, he's still gonna burn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More Horsefeathers from Sparks

Trump gave campaign funds to many politicians,  golfed with many - so what?

Guiliana is also in that photo, posing with an ex-President

=====

(every day the fake Muelller report unravels a bit more

Nolte: Dirty Cop Mueller Selectively Edited Trump Lawyer Voice Mail

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, drbubb said:

Guiliana is also in that photo, posing with an ex-President

Yes, its a photo of a group of friends with a long history.

1 hour ago, drbubb said:

so what?

Epstein is in that photo too

Although they are all a little older now

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/attorney-federal-prosecutors-seeking-new-info-about-billionaire-pedophile-jeffrey-epstein/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guilt by association, eh?

Why do you not pay attention to evidence of ACTUAL crimes? ala Hillary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, drbubb said:

Guilt by association, eh?

guilt by evidence.

at least once they unredact the pedo parts of the mueller report.

1 hour ago, drbubb said:

Why do you not pay attention to evidence of ACTUAL crimes? ala Hillary

Would be happy to.

I dont have anything substantive. do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MUELLER UNDERMINED... by Mueller himself

Mueller Repeatedly Contradicts Himself & Undermines Russiagate

 

Didn't Mueller lie to us and the world about WMD's in Iraq? Why is he taken seriously by anyone but his mom?
Sabrewolf
"Baghdad has failed to disarm its weapons of mass destruction" - Robert Mueller Who do you believe? A lying war criminal or a journalist whose publications have never been falsified?

 

Shannon Sun/Moon Virgo
His name was Seth Rich and his murder remains unsolved. Free Julian Assange

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×