Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Green New Deal = Socialism & Lies on Steroids

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, drbubb said:

She IS DANGEROUS. and needs to be endlessly ridiculed

. . . We need to turn their own Lunatic Rules against them

Sebastian Gorka: Why Ocasio-Cortez Isn’t Amusing

so you keep saying.

not sure definitive proof she eats hamburgers goes very far towards justifying that statement though.

I mean like, how dangerous can a [once] poor americunt from the bronx really be?

although Gorka is dead right with his headline point.

its not amuzing, the whole shitshow is absolutely hillarious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While theses gaffes and the memes to which they give rise are truly amusing, the humor of it all shouldn’t give the Right a sense of security. The New Green Deal is a socialist plan for the largest redistribution of wealth the world has ever seen, and it will cost you $93 trillion.

The GND is “watermelon policy”—green on the outside and deep red on the inside. It’s socialism under the cloak of environmentalism. What’s more, the proposal isn’t merely the collected ravings of a fringe freshman congresswoman. The Green New Deal has been endorsed by a slew of Democrat representatives and senators, including some who think they have a shot at being the next president, such as Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

> https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/26/why-ocasio-cortez-isnt-amusing/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, drbubb said:

The New Green Deal is a socialist plan for the largest redistribution of wealth the world has ever seen, and it will cost you $93 trillion

so its basically free then?

given the dollar is completely worthless everywhere in the world these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dollar is not "completely worthless" - Are you nuts?

maybe you ARE NUTS, and are the secret real father of AOC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Green New Deal = A "Suicide Note" from the Dems?

Are the Democrats Bent on Suicide?

After reading an especially radical platform agreed upon by the British Labor Party, one Tory wag described it as “the longest suicide note in history.”

The phrase comes to mind on reading of the resolution calling for a Green New Deal, advanced by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and endorsed by at least five of the major Democratic candidates for president.

The Green New Deal is designed to recall the halcyon days of the 1930s, when, so the story goes, FDR came to Washington to enact the historic reforms that rescued America from the Great Depression.

Only that story is more than a small myth.

The unemployment rate when FDR took the oath in 1933 was 25 percent. It never fell below 14 percent through the 1930s. In June 1938, despite huge Democratic majorities in Congress, FDR was presiding over a nation where unemployment was back up to 19 percent.

World War II and the conscription of 16 million young men gave us “full employment.” And the war’s end and demobilization saw the return of real prosperity in 1946, after FDR was dead.

Yet this Green New Deal is nothing if not ambitious.

To cope with climate change, the GND calls for a 10-year plan to meet “100 percent of the power demand of the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources.”

This appears to require a phase-out by 2030 of all carbon-emitting power plants fueled by coal and oil and their replacement by power plants fueled by wind and solar.

Will natural gas be permitted? Will nuclear power? There are 60 commercially operating nuclear power plants with 98 nuclear reactors in 30 states. Will they be shut down? Will the Greens agree to dam up more U.S. rivers to produce renewable hydroelectric power?

Air travel consumes huge quantities of carbon-producing jet fuel. What will replace it? Perhaps progressive Democratic candidates will set an example by not flying, and then by voting to end production of private aircraft and to ground all corporate jets. Let the elites sail to Davos.

. . .

Fifty years after the Great Society, apparently half the country consists of victims of oppression.

Who are their oppressors? Guess.

Among the endorsers of this Green New Deal is Sen. Cory Booker, who compares the battle to stop climate change to fighting the Nazis in World War II. Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have all endorsed it. Sen. Bernie Sanders, who calls climate change “an existential threat,” was an original co-sponsor.

Nancy Pelosi has more sense. Interviewed last week, the speaker batted the Green New Deal aside: “It will be one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive. The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?”

With her own agenda and priorities, Pelosi does not want to be dragged into having to defend a document that reads like it was written by the college socialists club.

The question, though, is why Democrats, who, if nominated, are likely to face Donald Trump in 2020, are signing on to so radical a scheme.

In a presidential election, the “out” party candidate usually has an advantage. No record to defend. He or she can choose the terrain on which to attack the incumbent, who has a four-year record.

Rarely does an out party present a fixed and stationary target as exposed as this, as out-of the-mainstream as this, as vulnerable as this.

> MORE: http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/are-the-democrats-bent-on-suicide/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

edit->find/replace

find "Climate Change"

replace with "Peak Oil"

->Replace All

Fixed That For You (FTFY)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, drbubb said:

The Dollar is not "completely worthless" - Are you nuts?

maybe you ARE NUTS, and are the secret real father of AOC

Cmon

When even "poor" Venezuelans have an average salary in dollars that is more than twice that of Americans, you surely have to concede the dollar is not really worth anything any more.

Some residual value left maybe from the UK desperately trying to keep the petrodollar alive.

But that ship has well and truly sailed now and we are deep in to "orderly unwinding"

Trump seems to have even just agreed with kim stop providing military support to south korea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THE LITTLE BITTY HYPOCRITE - she's a boss among young hypocrites

Gas-guzzling car rides expose AOC’s hypocrisy amid Green New Deal pledge

190302-aoc-cars.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

...the woman who boasts of a “razor-sharp BS detector” seems to have trouble sniffing out her own.

Since declaring her candidacy in May 2017, Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign heavily relied on those combustible-engine cars — even though a subway station was just 138 feet from her Elmhurst campaign office.

She listed 1,049 transactions for Uber, Lyft, Juno and other car services, federal filings show. The campaign had 505 Uber expenses alone.

In all, Ocasio-Cortez spent $29,365.70 on those emissions-spewing vehicles, along with car and van rentals — even though her Queens HQ was a one-minute walk to the 7 train.

The campaign shelled out only $8,335.41 on 52 MetroCard transactions.

“Everyone — top to bottom — used the MetroCards,” Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent told The Post.

By comparison, fellow freshman Rep. Max Rose — whose district is more than twice the size of AOC’s and, like hers, spans two boroughs — listed only 329 transactions for car services, totaling $6,091.29, campaign filings show.

In a district with limited transit options and a $17 Verrazzano Bridge toll, Rose spent only $732 more than AOC on gas and tolls — an indicator of personal car usage.

Ocasio-Cortez has repeatedly attributed her success in beating Democratic incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley to walking the streets of her district, which includes parts of Queens and The Bronx.

“I knocked doors until rainwater came through my soles,” she tweeted last June, famously donating her worn-out campaign shoes to the Cornell Costume Institute for an exhibit about women and empowerment.

But Ocasio-Cortez and her staff appear to have done much less walking after she vanquished Crowley in the party’s June 2018 primary.

Instead, her campaign embraced the friendly skies, logging 66 airline transactions costing $25,174.54 during campaign season.

image.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/4/2019 at 3:39 AM, drbubb said:

But Ocasio-Cortez and her staff appear to have done much less walking after she vanquished Crowley in the party’s June 2018 primary.

First time I read it I was like "meh so what, not like they started picking up the tab in the beast ,  London"

Then I saw the above gem.

Today's winners of the no shit sherlock awards.

Wonder what their next attempt will be?

Perhaps they could go with:

"Obama for president 2008 posters nowhere to be seen in run up to the 2020 election"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the mother of nOcortex does not want higher taxes (to pay for things like Green Dreams)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/5/2019 at 4:27 PM, drbubb said:

the mother of nOcortex does not want higher taxes (to pay for things like Green Dreams)

tax is a fine on stupidity.

Must be why querecanos pay so much of it for so little in return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2019 at 8:53 AM, mSparks said:

tax is a fine on stupidity.

Must be why querecanos pay so much of it for so little in return.

The daughter of nOCortex is nor so stupid as her child.

She would aim to avoid taxes her child may impose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, drbubb said:

The daughter of nOCortex is nor so stupid as her child.

She would aim to avoid taxes her child may impose

somehow i doubt she makes more than £10 million a year and then chooses to live in the bronx. so why would she need to avoid anything?

not as smart as telling everyone they got a tax cut then slapping them with a huge tax bill instead of a refund at the end of the year tho surely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why I Satirize Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (THE SAAD TRUTH_844)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, drbubb said:

agreed, would be a catastrophy if the US replicated the disaster for the oil industry that is

As of 2018, renewable energy accounted for 79% of the domestically produced electricity used in Brazil.

___

otoh

fuck the Koch brothers. they make Soros look saintly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deeper Discovery Into Origins Of The Green New Deal

By Patrick Wood

Internationally, the Green New Deal first appeared in England in 2008 with a 44-page report by the Green New Deal Group, simply called A Green New Deal. An excerpt appears below, concluding with a download button and a supporting video produced by a sister organization called the New Economics Foundation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×