Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Two Genders Only : Truth strikes back against Delusions

Recommended Posts

Two Genders Only : Truth strikes back against Delusionals

men-women-10-3-18.jpg

Called SciFi: (see post #3, below)

She (Prof. Stock) listed off the facts supporting her argument that changing genders is science fiction – not a reality, as most LGBT activists would like to believe.

"The first is whether self-identifying as a woman without medical certification should be sufficient criteria for legal gender reassignment,” Stock continued. “The second is whether self-identifying transwomen should be allowed into women-only spaces and have access to women-only resources."

 

President Trump Is Considering Going Back to Science & 2 Genders, Crushing the Democrat Flat-Earthers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot the difference - between Protections & Privileges?

adam_eve_river.jpg

NYT: Trump administration could rollback transgender protections and initiatives from Obama era

The Trump administration may rollback  an Obama-era push to recognize and protect broader definitions of gender, according to a New York Times report.

What is the proposal?

The Department of Health and Human Services could establish a legal definition of gender under Title IX, which would be based on a person’s genitalia at birth, a memo obtained by the news outlet showed. Title IX is the federal law that bars gender discrimination in education programs that receive federal funding.

According to the memo, HHS would define gender as being “a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable.”

The definition could not be changed legally and any disputes would require genetic testing, according to the report.

What would this mean?

In essence, the proposed language change would remove certain protections for about 1.4 million Americans who identify as transgender, Fox News reported. It would also do away with a series of contentions by the Obama administration that people can be any gender they choose.

“This takes a position that what the medical community understands about their patients — what people understand about themselves — is irrelevant because the government disagrees,” Catherine Lhamon, who headed the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights during the Obama administration, told the New York Times.

Conservatives, especially evangelical Christians, rose up against various Obama-era initiatives, including a national campaign to allow people to choose public restrooms or dormitory housing, for example, based on their stated gender.

In the past,Roger Severino, head of the Office of Civil Rights accused the Obama administration of a “radical gender ideology.”

=====

"Protections", eh?  Fake News NYT is Wrong once again!

More like rolling back privileges, and legal enforcement of Delusional thinking.

Put a fork into that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

50+ scholars expose UK agenda restricting transgender criticism

lgbtq_on_campus_350x219.jpg

More than four dozen scholars from the United Kingdom signed onto a letter warning that the government’s proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act and interpretation of the Equality Act – as well as politically correct campus politics – are restraining and censoring academics and analysts from critically investigating, researching and teaching about transgender issues.

The 54 scholars representing a newly formed network of more than 100 scholars – most serving at U.K. universities, including Oxford and Cambridge, along with some from American universities, including MIT and George Washington University Law School – are alerting the public about higher education’s censorship of information that reveals the danger a transgender lifestyle poses to gender-confused individuals … and to society, at large.

In addition, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne allowed the dozens of scholars to submit several letters to the U.K.’s consultation earlier this week that express their fears over the government’s introduction of self-ID for gender reassignment – legally identifying transgenders as their opposite, non-biological sex.

Only speak positive … or else …

A major concern of academic leaders – from the fields of sociology, philosophy, law, criminology, evidence-informed policy, medicine, psychology, education, history, English, social work, computer science, cognitive science, anthropology, political science, economics, and history of art – was voiced about how professors are essentially handcuffed by the government, university officials and LGBT activist groups from revealing any scientific information explaining the detrimental effects that transgenderism has on sexually confused individuals and vulnerable women and children.

“[T]he scholars … aired their complaints about how they have faced an unusual amount of opposition for what they consider to be normal critical analysis of scientific and political assertions,” The Christian Post (CP) reported. “The group also condemned the influence that LGBT political organizations are having when it comes to the limiting of academic freedom on college campuses.”

The academic professionals’ signed document discusses how they are continually being silenced from dispensing reliable information concerning the harm that transgender medical practices and lifestyles entail.

. . .

Anti-intellectual movement in universities?

Instead of having an allegiance to dispense academic knowledge and encourage critical thinking, it was argued that a large proportion of universities in the U.K. are loyal to pro-LGBT groups that fervently promote alternative lifestyles and fiercely oppose those who don’t.

“Many of our universities have close links with trans advocacy organizations who provide ‘training’ of academics and management, and who – it is reasonable to suppose – influence university policy through these links,” the letter continues. “Definitions used by these organizations of what counts as ‘transphobic’ can be dangerously all-encompassing and go well beyond what a reasonable law would describe.”

The new terms and euphemisms concocted by LGBT activists are argued to be suppressing intellect and harming society.

“They would not withstand academic analysis, and yet their effect is to curtail academic freedom and facilitate the censoring of academic work,” the scholars contend. “We also worry about the effect of such definitions on the success rates of journal submissions and research grant applications from governmental bodies such as the AHRC and ESRC.”

The scholars ended by dismissing claims that offering a critical analysis of transgender behavior and medical practices is hate speech or intolerance.

“We maintain that it is not transphobic to investigate and analyze this area from a range of critical academic perspectives,” the letter concludes. “We think this research is sorely needed and urge the government to take the lead in protecting any such research from ideologically driven attack.”

. . .She listed off the facts supporting her argument that changing genders is science fiction – not a reality, as most LGBT activists would like to believe.

"The first is whether self-identifying as a woman without medical certification should be sufficient criteria for legal gender reassignment,” Stock continued. “The second is whether self-identifying transwomen should be allowed into women-only spaces and have access to women-only resources."

> https://onenewsnow.com/education/2018/10/19/50plus-scholars-expose-uk-agenda-restricting-transgender-criticism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HittingPRNailOnHead.gif

Hitting the transgender (Delusion?) nail on the head …

University of Sussex philosophy professor Kathleen Stock – one of the letter’s 43 signatories – publicly and candidly voiced her take on the matter earlier this month in a column.

"A range of structural inequalities between females and males are widely recognized,” Stock wrote in her op-ed for The Conversation, donning the headline, “Why self-identification should not legally make you a woman.”  “These material facts about female oppression must be acknowledged when we think about two questions at the heart of a bitterly disputed U.K. government consultation on reforming the Gender Recognition Act."

She listed off the facts supporting her argument that changing genders is science fiction – not a reality, as most LGBT activists would like to believe.

"The first is whether self-identifying as a woman without medical certification should be sufficient criteria for legal gender reassignment,” Stock continued. “The second is whether self-identifying transwomen should be allowed into women-only spaces and have access to women-only resources."

The respected professor stirred up more controversy and outrage from the LGBT community this summer when she indicated that simply having a sex-change operation does not convert a man into a woman – any more than wearing women’s shoes make a man a woman.

"[T]rans women are still  males with male genitalia," Stock told the U.K.’s The Argus in a July interview.

The same month, she upset more LGBT activists when she questioned the label the transgender community ascribed to her for being vocal about her politically incorrect take on the controversial social issue.

"I emphatically deny that I am transphobic," Stock insisted to Pink News in July, according to CP. "I vocally uphold the rights of trans women to be free of violence and discrimination, but I question whether the only way to protect trans women from violence is to allow trans women into female communal spaces."

> https://onenewsnow.com/education/2018/10/19/50plus-scholars-expose-uk-agenda-restricting-transgender-criticism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LIKELY DEM-ocratic Voter... wants to force others to accept his Delusion

Democrats Who Believe in Trangenderism are Science Deniers

The New York Times is apoplectic – again.

But this time, it’s because of something so scary to the left, so unimaginably horrific, so brutally honest, so politically incorrect – an act of courage so profound by President Trump – that it could possibly save the country from ruin.

Either that, or we might want to consider the possibility of two separate countries dividing things up and going our own ways as, well … not quite friends.

The New York Times headline says it all – and the news and political earthquake it is setting off is likely to have plenty of seismic aftershocks on the Richter scale:

“‘Transgender’ Could Be Defined Out of Existence Under Trump Administration”

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/transgender-is-a-political-test-not-science/#PMHiCZoSXxZGed0M.99

BRING IT ON! 

Put an end to Dangerous, culture-destroying Delusions!

/ 2 /

It was during Obama’s time in office that he himself went from publicly opposing “gay marriage” to publicly shaming opposition to it – in fact, to leading the U.S. Supreme Court into embracing it, despite outspoken opposition to same-sex marriage not that long ago from Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and other Democrat leaders.

It was during that time that Obama became a zealot for “trans-mania.”

He virtually made it illegal for women to compete only against women in sports, violating millennia of tradition and basic common sense.

Does anyone even realize the way “feminism” and “trans-mania” are now increasingly in mortal conflict? Do we even realize how oppressive this is for women athletes?

A series of decisions by the Obama administration loosened the legal concept of gender in federal programs, including in education and health care, recognizing gender largely as an individual’s choice and not determined by the sex assigned at birth. The policy prompted fights over bathrooms, dormitories, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept. Conservatives, especially evangelical Christians, were incensed.

Now the Department of Health and Human Services is spearheading an effort to establish a legal definition of sex under Title IX, the federal civil rights law that bans gender discrimination in education programs that receive government financial assistance, according to a memo obtained by The New York Times.

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/transgender-is-a-political-test-not-science/#PMHiCZoSXxZGed0M.99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Get TRUTH on your side, Man !"

At 24 Minutes: YOU DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO MANIPULATE REALITY.
You have the ability to CONFRONT Reality, but not to bend it.
You cannot get away with a Falsehood... If you Tell the Truth, then :
YOU HAVE REALITY ON YOUR SIDE.

Jordan Peterson - UNCENSORED

==

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EXPOSING THE DELUSION... held by Delusionals

The truth of "re-assignment surgery" = It does not work !

Top Doctor Reveals Many Transgenders Regret Surgery, Want Reversal

Life for many after gender reassignment surgery isn't 'happily ever after,' according to a leading industry surgeon.

Dr. Miroslav Djordjevic, a world-leading genital reconstructive surgeon, says he and other colleagues are seeing increasing numbers of those who have undergone sex-change surgery wanting to transition back.

“Those wishing the reversal, Djordjevic says, have spoken to him about crippling levels of depression following their transition and in some cases even contemplated suicide,” the British National Post reported.

The 52-year-old Serbian said, “It can be a real disaster to hear these stories,” but he added their stories are not being heard.

Djordjevic told the National Post he requires patients seeking to transition surgery to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for a minimum of one to two years and have two professional letters of recommendation.

While his practice has this safeguard in place, the doctor is concerned that the psychiatric evaluation and counseling that people receive elsewhere before undergoing gender reassignment is far from adequate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRANZ-America : sooo Over now?

transa.jpg?itok=k_Pd_Kd0 : TransAmerica (2006): "Sensitive portrayal of transsexual"

This movie ... helped to launch Transgenders as a fashionable Identity Group, serving The "Progressive" Agenda

Trump To Put an End To Transgenderism in America

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rev. Graham Praises Trump Administration for Defining Sex as ‘Male’ or ‘Female’

Christian leader Franklin Graham praised the Trump administration's plan to legally define a person's sex as either male or female, based on biology and objective science and not on personal choice, stating that LGBT activists would oppose the measure but "anatomy" is real and God "created them male and female."

On Oct. 21, the New York Times reported that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is seeking to roll back the gender-fluid policy of the Obama administration and approve a legal definition of sex under Title IX. A person's sex would be determined “on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable," and demonstrable by one's genitalia at birth.

"The sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence," states the HHS memorandum on the topic. The Times and other liberal critics complained that the science-based definition would undermine the rights of people who claim to be transgender. 

Commenting on the proposal in an Oct. 23 Facebook post, Rev. Graham said, "How did gender—something that is determined by chromosomes and anatomy—ever become flexible, fluid, or according to personal preference?"

transgender_1_0.jpg

"Some have attempted to throw science and fact out the window saying a person can be a man or boy one day and decide to be a woman or girl the next," said Graham.  "This has come at great expense—and confusion—across our country. We have watched as it impacted insurance coverage, school locker rooms, public restrooms, athletics, and much more."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ENDING the Privileges for Delusionals

President Trump’s Plan to End Obama’s Special Privileges for Trannies Gets Applauded by Conservatives

Driving back Obama’s abomination …

Because many of the pro-LGBT privileges put America’s youth in physical – and emotional – danger, many Americans vehemently opposed Obama’s radical new policies catering to the left.

“The policy prompted fights over bathrooms, dormitories, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept,” the Times’ Erica L. Green, Katie Benner and Robert Pear recalled. “Conservatives – especially evangelical Christians – were incensed.”

Obama’s LGBT privileges have been seen as particularly endangering vulnerable women and children – exposing them to potentially being exploited by sexual predators in areas where they are most susceptible to abuse.

“But the transgender ideology demands that the federal government enforce rules which help people easily switch their legal sex – regardless of biology,” Breitbart News reported. “This ideology would eliminate many single-sex institutions, including sports leagues, showers and bathrooms.”

The New York daily obtained a memo from Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which is spearheading the attempt to establish a legal definition of sex under Title IX – a federal civil rights law that prohibits government-funded education programs from discriminating by gender.

“[Key government agencies must adopt an explicit and uniform definition of gender that is determined] on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable,” the Trump HHS document reads.

Instead of leaving it up to a person’s whim as to whether one wants to identify as male, female – or something else – HHS is moving to establish a no-nonsense, practical solution that has worked fine for societies over the millennia.

“The agency’s proposed definition would define sex as either male or female, unchangeable, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with, according to a draft reviewed by the Times,” Green, Benner and Pear noted. “Any dispute about one’s sex would have to be clarified using genetic testing.”

. . . USPIE proceeded to condemn Obama for catering to LGBT activists instead of protecting vulnerable citizens.

“The Obama administration blurred the lines that define gender with its transgender bathroom edict threatening government schools with the loss of federal funding if they continued to protect schoolchildren with private bathroom and locker room policies,” the conservative group added. “The Obama administration took advantage of every opportunity to advance the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender (LGBT) movement through federal agencies without constitutional authority. [Our mission is] to end federal overreach in education and return control of education to parents and local communities.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce: No to Truth!

Straight Talk on Gender, Jenner does not like.

FEELINGS should Trump science

Trans Jenner Denounces Trump: ‘I was Wrong’ to Support Him

Bruce-Caitlyn-Jenner-GettyImages-640x480

“Despite the criticism I received from segments of the LGBTQ community for engaging with this administration, I remained hopeful for positive change. Sadly, I was wrong,” Jenner wrote in the editorial.

Jenner went on to insist that “the trans community is being relentlessly attacked by this president.”

Then Jenner went on the attack:

The leader of our nation has shown no regard for an already marginalized and struggling community. He has ignored our humanity. He has insulted our dignity. He has made trans people into political pawns as he whips up animus against us in an attempt to energize the most right-wing segment of his party, claiming his anti-transgender policies are meant to “protect the country.” This is politics at its worst. It is unacceptable, it is upsetting, and it has deeply, personally hurt me.

Jenner pointed to the recently leaked information that the Department of Health and Human Services may seek to return the government’s definition of gender to that of biological birth leaving Barack Obama’s politically motivated transgender polices back off the books.

The proposed return to scientific definitions of gender caught Jenner off guard.

“It’s clear these policies have come directly from Trump, and they have been sanctioned, passively or actively, by the Republicans by whose continued support he governs,” Jenner lamented. “My hope in him — in them — was misplaced, and I cannot support anyone who is working against our community. I do not support Trump. I must learn from my mistakes and move forward.”

Jenner ended the op-ed promising to continue working for transgender activists.

> https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/10/26/caitlyn-jenner-denounces-donald-trump-i-was-wrong-to-support-him/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Americans Oppose Third Gender Option on IDs

Canada last year became the 10th country to allow residents to choose a gender option other than male or female on their passports, but most Americans agree with the Trump administration’s current consideration of limiting the definition of gender strictly to biology and oppose a third gender option on legal documents in this country.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 50% of American Adults oppose allowing a third gender option on passports, drivers’ licenses and other official forms of identification. Thirty-one percent (31%) favor a third gender option, but 19% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the LIES we want to end... Not the Lives!

End their privileges, and protection of their fantasies, Except them, when they are honest

x

Trannies Unveil ‘Trans People Deserve to Live’ Banner at World Series [Who Said They Didn’t ‘Deserve to Live?’]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UCSB Student Argues ‘Virginity Doesn’t Exist’ in Newspaper Column

UCSB Student: ‘Virginity Doesn’t Exist’

A student at the University of California, Santa Barbara argued in a recent newspaper column that “virginity doesn’t exist.”

Anabel Costa, a student at the University of California, Santa Barbara, argued in a recently published student newspaper column that “virginity” is a problematic heteronormative concept.

Everyone likes to talk about sex, and growing up, virginity always seemed to take the spotlight. Sleepovers are riddled with questions like, “When will I lose my virginity?” or, “How did you lose your virginity?” These questions always plagued me, yet at the same time, they brought immense curiosity. As a queer woman, I have a lot of confusion and frustration with the word itself. Over time I’ve come to realize that virginity doesn’t even exist; by definition, it refers to the first time someone has sex, but sex can mean different things to different people.

Costa goes on to argue that “sex” is defined by the presence of male genitalia. As a result, gay women often feel like their sexual activity doesn’t rise to the level of other forms of intercourse.

My issues with this only come in when queer women who have had sex with other women are considered virgins simply because they’ve never been penetrated. My girlfriend has been called a virgin by our friends because they don’t readily accept what we do as sex. So if my intimate experiences with my girlfriend are not sex, then neither is your “in and out three times on the fourth floor of the library.” Ultimately, sex is culturally defined by the presence of a penis, or at least some form of penetration, and this is just wrong.

Readers had mixed responses to the piece. “As an atheist, reading this article makes me consider becoming a Christian,” one user wrote. “Proof positive that the California Education System has failed miserably,” another user wrote.

Some readers said that they were moved by the piece. “Love this piece so much! Means a lot as a queer woman to hear someone having a similar experience,” another user wrote.

===

Pity that peoples' heads don't instantly explode when they use the word: "problematic"

This woman does not grok full-sex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Science Shows Sex Is Binary, Not a Spectrum

Last week, The New York Times ran an op-ed by Anne Fausto-Sterling, a professor of biology and gender studies at Brown University, arguing that biological sex is not binary. The piece joined a long succession of media coverage criticizing the Department of Health and Human Services’ recently leaked memo, which proposed legally defining sex as either male or female.

From a scientific perspective, there was nothing wrong with HHS’s definition. Biological sex refers to whether we are female or male, based on our anatomy and reproductive functions. The concept of sex is, by definition, binary.

Fausto-Sterling’s piece points to the existence of intersex people as evidence that this isn’t the case. Certainly, research has shown that as many as 1 percent of the population is intersex, a medical condition denoting that an individual possesses anatomy characteristic of both sexes, such as a combination of vulvar and testicular tissue. Statistically speaking, however, this means that the vast majority of us fall into one category of sex or the other.

It therefore becomes a question of whether a statistically rare occurrence in the general population should be considered typical. An analogy that is commonly used to illustrate this is the fact that most of us have 10 fingers. There exist individuals who possess fewer or more than 10 digits on their hands, but this hasn’t called for a re-conceptualization of how many fingers a human being has.

. . .

The piece also references the work of psychologist John Money, which contradicts Fausto-Sterling’s very thesis. Not only have Money’s ideas pertaining to gender identity been widely discredited, but they also demonstrate how gender is biological. Many have surely heard of the unfortunate case of David Reimer, a Canadian man whom Money surgically reassigned as female after Reimer lost his penis in a botched circumcision as a child. Money believed that Reimer could be successfully socialized to live life as a girl.

Upon reaching adolescence, however, Reimer chose to return to living as a male, and tragically took his own life at the age of 38 after facing these hardships. Reimer’s case speaks to the innateness of gender—that one’s sense of being male or female is not learned.

It isn’t necessary to redefine “sex” in order to facilitate the acceptance of people who are different. Pushing for social change for the sake of change, as many of those on the left seem wont to do, only leads to misguided policies and unnecessary confusion for the public.

Going beyond Fausto-Sterling’s op-ed, this argument has been extended to include the transgender community, with its proponents contending that transgender people defy male and female categorization, and offer proof that sex and gender are a spectrum. But in reality, the term “transgender” means that a person identifies more as the opposite sex than their birth sex—which still operates within a framework of sex being binary.

===

More wrong-headed Stupidity from Lefty idiots like Fausto-Sterling & the NYT/Fool York Times

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Choosing Female Privilege(s)

Slippery Slope Update: Men are Saying They’re Women to Get Cushier Prison Sentences…And Female Prisoners Pay the Price

transgender_man_1_810_500_75_s_c1.jpg

November 15, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – If you have been wondering just how far the media will go in accepting the ludicrous premises of the transgender movement, consider this recent headline from Canada’s largest newspaper, the Toronto Star: “Transgender woman gets 18-month sentence for sexually assaulting daughter.”

You could be forgiven for initially thinking, upon reading this headline, that this is one of those rare, horrible cases where the mother rather than a male relative was the sexual predator. In fact, the first sentence of the news article seems to confirm that misconception, as the Star obediently refers to the person in question as a female: “A Quebec City transgender parent who sexually assaulted her young daughter will be serving a sentence in a woman’s jail after undergoing a sex change between the time of the crime and the conviction.”

The devil, as is often the case, is in the details—if that strange fact seemed somewhat confusing, everything is cleared up in the following lines: “The 33-year-old—the victim’s biological father—had pleaded guilty to crimes that took place in 2013 when the girl was just three. The accused was separated from the girl’s mother at the time, and in the months following the assaults, she underwent a sex change.” Well, he actually underwent a sex change in order to become a she. But these things can be confusing.

Of course, now that he has become a she, this sexual predator can now be sent off to a prison for ladies, which has the dual benefit of being full of women (which this “biological father” is not, despite any drugs and nips and tucks acquired between sexually assaulting a little girl and being sentenced) and not being full of men, who have a reputation for treating sexual predators that get locked in with them very, very badly.

Not that sexual predators get locked up for very long in Canada, anyway. The Crown was only asking for between 18 months and two years in jail for sexually assaulting a three-year-old, which the judge granted (along with probation, mandatory therapy, and a twenty-year stint on the sex offender list.) But the jail sentence, meanwhile, will get spent in a women’s prison.

Just a couple of years ago, critics of trans ideology were pointing out that this sort of thing was inevitable: If society was forced to accept that people were whatever gender they claimed to be and biological reality was irrelevant to their assertions, then men would start to demand to go to female prisons (as just one example.) And this has become an increasingly common phenomenon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Famed Feminist Furious After Twitter Says She Violated Rules By Saying Men Are Not Women

gettyimages-1040275364.jpg?itok=lNX7rTxt

On Thursday, an ardent Canadian feminist who has supported the #MeToo movement but has opposed a bill that would encode gender identity and gender expression into Canadian law furiously revealed that Twitter wouldn't let her say that men are not women.

Meghan Murphy, who founded the feminist blog and podcast Feminist Current in 2012, had tweeted in October, “Men aren’t women tho,” and “How are transwomen not men? What is the difference between men and transwomen?”

On Thursday, Murphy revealed on Twitter that she had been notified by Twitter that her language in the tweet had violated their rules against hateful conduct.

Murphy was furious, and tweeted, “This is f**king bullshit @twitter. I'm not allowed to say that men aren't women or ask questions about the notion of transgenderism at all anymore? That a multi billion dollar company is censoring BASIC FACTS and silencing people who ask questions about this dogma is INSANE.”

Murphy continued on Twitter:

What ARE we allowed to say here??? How tf is simply saying 'men aren't women' hateful??? I am losing my goddamned mind over this. Enjoy your brave new world, sjws. Here's your f***ing social justice … I'm assuming my account is going to get locked again simply for speaking about this. But this is not f***ing ok and I'm not going to let it go silently … Trans activists have been targeting my account for a few months now. Either someone at Twitter or with an in at Twitter has been combing through old tweets and reporting them for “hateful conduct.” Twitter seems to instantly shut my account down without a second thought.

One Twitter user responded to Murphy by tweeting, “One more time for those in the back: the right to free speech protects you from the government. Not criticism. You are entitled to say whatever dumb thing you want. You are not entitled to a private company providing you an audience.” Murphy fired back, “Yeah and the government is trying to legislate against our free speech, thanks to gender identity ideology. Pay attention.”

In 2013, Murphy referred to Twitter as "a horrible place for feminism ... intellectual laziness is encouraged, oversimplification is mandatory, posturing is de rigueur, and bullying is rewarded.”

When she appeared before the Canadian Senate in 2017 to oppose bill C-16, which encoded gender identity and gender expression into Canadian law, Murphy stated, "Treating gender as though it is either internal or a personal choice is dangerous and completely misunderstands how and why women are oppressed under patriarchy as a class of people. ... The rights of women and girls are being pushed aside to accommodate a trend."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do Trannies "transition" to gain "Female Privilege"?

Some women literally "get away with murder". Trannies too?

Tranny Privilege: Toronto Judge Gives Tranny Killer Preferential Sentence Not Available to Normals

 A transgender prostitute who stabbed another man to death is being given a break on his prison sentence because a judge thinks the convict has already suffered more than non-transgender felons by being incarcerated in a men's prison after his arrest.

REAL Women of Canada's national vice president and legal counsel says that's ridiculous.

"The court is leaning over backwards to give 'her' special privileges," said Gwen Landolt, the pro-life and pro-family lobby group's national vice president, in an interview.

"It is absurd," she said.

Curtis Gordon Dawkins is a 28-year-old man who thinks he's a woman. He was working as a prostitute and calling himself "Moka" in early August 2015 when he stabbed Jamie Foster, a john, multiple times, both in a living room and a bedroom.

Toronto police arrived at the crime scene at 1:46 a.m. on the day of the stabbing to find Dawkins covered in blood, shouting incoherently, and holding a sword in one hand and two kitchen knives in the other.

"After being handcuffed, Ms. Dawkins continued to act wildly, yelling, screaming, shaking her head violently, and throwing herself on the ground," a court document states.

Dawkins, who was charged with murder, originally claimed he acted in self-defense. His lawyer tried to introduce evidence from a sociologist, Dr. Vivienne Namaste, that purportedly showed transgender people, particularly those who work as prostitutes, suffer more violence and their responses to attacks are different because of their experiences.

Superior Court Justice Robert Clark threw out that evidence, ruling it was unnecessary.

. . .

"This just points to the absurdity of this transgender business," said Landolt. "This 'woman' wants it both ways. 'She' kills someone and then she wants pity from the court … 'She's' expecting special privileges. 'She' wants to be given everything."

The national vice president for REAL Women said the court's decision to give Dawkins two days of credit for every day spent at the Toronto South Detention Centre will only put a convicted killer back on the streets sooner than usual.

"Here's an unstable, mentally-incapable person who killed someone and now will be on the streets sooner than someone else," said Landolt. "The court was absolutely wrong."

. . . Landolt considers the current practice of allowing people to identify their own gender as senseless and "a pathetic misrepresentation of reality."

She urges all social conservatives in Canada to speak up against Bill C-16, the law introduced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government two years ago that added gender expression and gender identity to the protected grounds under the Canadian Human Rights Act and to Criminal Code provisions dealing with hate propaganda, factors in sentencing, and incitement to genocide.

"There is no rational reason why we should put up with this as taxpayers," said Landolt.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Celine Nunu Nunu ... Satanic clothes for mixed-up kids

Something STRANGE Is Happening To Celine Dion (2018)

Too much devil-worship by another mixed-up celebrity?

She wants "to blow magic dust" - It is pure delusion.

Her masculine husband has passed on... and she seems to be losing it

Death Cult culture?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DELUSIONS have been Pushed too far... It;s Time to restore Reality

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6401593/Whistleblower-teacher-makes-shocking-claim-autistic.html

Excerpts:
School (in the UK) has SEVENTEEN children changing gender as teacher says vulnerable pupils are being ‘tricked’ into believing they are the wrong sex

Most of children undergoing transformation are autistic according to teacher
This means that 150 autistic teenagers were issued with puberty blocker drugs

She (the whistleblower teacher who wished to remain anonymous for fear of losing her job) believes schools and some politicians have swallowed ‘hook, line and sinker’ a politically-correct ‘fallacy’ peddled by a powerful transgender lobby.

She was advised to keep parents and other teachers in the dark if a pupil claimed to be transgender;

Older pupils at her school who changed gender ‘groomed’ younger, mainly autistic students to do the same;

The Government is now consulting on whether to allow people to change gender without medical diagnoses.

It has sparked a furious debate about whether men who say they identify as women should be allowed into female-only spaces.

===

I believe in VERY HEAVY penalties for those who push this madness

We need to end this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How to deal with testoserone-fueled young men?

TRUTH JIHAD Linh Dinh on “Genitalia as Social Constructs”:

USA has gone crazy, Vietnam still somewhat sane

quote-i-don-t-know-if-you-or-i-exist-but

MP3 : https://media.blubrry.com/vtradio/s/content.blubrry.com/vtradio/tjradio-8-29-18-dinh.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 58:02 — 53.1MB)

Linh Dinh used to be one of America’s best up-and-coming writers. Now he is one of Vietnam’s best!

Why would someone with Linh’s talent leave the USA? Doesn’t the brain drain usually flow the other way?

In this interview Linh explains why he left, and expresses pity for those of us stuck in the belly of the American beast. Our discussion also touches on Linh’s provocative, politically-incorrect article “Genitalia as Social Constructs.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gender Delusions Affirmed at Twitter

Home of Twits, Delusionals, and protected Leftwing snowflakes

Jack-Dorsey-Twitter-Transgenderism-1024x

NEW LUNACY: Twitter Officially Bans ‘Misgendering’ in Terms of Service

After banning journalist Laura Loomer this week for making completely factual statements about an elected U.S. government official, Twitter has reaffirmed its commitment to freedom of expression by reportedly banning the “misgendering” of transgendered people.

“We prohibit targeting individuals with repeated slurs, tropes or other content that intends to dehumanize, degrade or reinforce negative or harmful stereotypes about a protected category, the updated terms of service say. “This includes targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

“Deadnaming” is apparently the practice of referring to a trans person by their given name, instead of the name they have chosen during their transition.

“These offensive techniques—which involve using the wrong gender to refer to a trans person or a trans person’s old name—are often used on Twitter to insult and erase trans people’s identities and right to exist,” said PinkNews. 

> More: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/new-lunacy-twitter-officially-bans-misgendering-in-terms-of-service/

/ 2 /

Progressive Feminist Suspended From Twitter After Criticizing The Transgender Movement

After deleting the allegedly hateful tweets, Murphy took her complaint to Twitter, writing in part:

This is f**king bulls*** @twitter. I'm not allowed to say that men aren't women or ask questions about the notion of transgenderism at all anymore? That a multi billion dollar company is censoring BASIC FACTS and silencing people who ask questions about this dogma is INSANE.

What ARE we allowed to say here??? How tf is simply saying 'men aren't women' hateful??? I am losing my goddamned mind over this. Enjoy your brave new world, sjws. Here's your f***ing social justice … I'm assuming my account is going to get locked again simply for speaking about this. But this is not f***ing ok and I'm not going to let it go silently …

/ 3 /

Laura Loomer Threatens Lawsuit Over Twitter Suspension, Banned for Truth-Telling on Muslim Democrat

Laura wrote: Isn’t it ironic how the twitter moment used to celebrate “women, LGBTQ, and minorities” is a picture of Ilhan Omar? Ilhan is pro-Sharia Ilhan is pro FGM. Under Sharia homosexuals are oppressed and killed. Women are abused and forced to wear the hijab. Ilhan is anti-Jewish.

On Wednesday, Laura Loomer was notified her account was shut down permanently.

===

There is a winnable court case here somewhere. TWTR cannot hide from Reality forever

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Describing the DELUSIONS...

"Male & Female brains are different... Studies are being done which hide or obscure the differences"

Dr. Debra Soh | The Glenn Beck Podcast Ep. 11

Mak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×