Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Ocasio, Hard Left Regressive Female = New face of Dems

Recommended Posts

MORE DANGEROUS than You Think!
And she cannot balance her checkbook (without crowd-funding)

Only Communists Allowed! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Backs Plan to Oust Incumbent Democrats and Replace With Progressive Leftists

George-Soros-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-30

Democratic Socialist Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed a left-wing activist group’s effort to primary fellow Democrats deemed to be too conservative.

“Long story short, I need you to run for office,” Ocasio-Cortez told the group Justice Democrats in a Saturday video conference, according to Politico. The group has launched a campaign called #OurTime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awake White People: This may be an Enemy, announcing herself AT WAR

Ocasio-Cortez Announces Intention to Have All Whites Removed From Positions of Power (video)

Ocasio Cortez , the Congressional-elect that wants the government to own your business, take over airports and abolish ICE, can’t remember what neighborhood she grew up in. And now, she has announced that she is targeting white people in power and seeks to have them removed. . Ocasio Cortez stands as an excellent example of the very kind of racist that she pretends to be fighting against.
 
( Comment ):

The Democratic party decided, probably about 10 years ago, that there were enough freaks, fags and minorities in the US that if they could get them all together in the same place, they could form a majority, and win elections. And it's nothing new. In a few places like California and Jew York it had worked many times. They decided to gamble, and roll the old gambit out nationwide. But what they never counted on, was that the above mentioned rabble might not be content to just take whatever crap the old guard decided to dole out to them. If anything at all. Usually the got nothing in return for their votes.

Secure in their delusions, and their conceit, the old party Democrats forged ahead. Now they have a real problem, a slave rebellion. They're going to be out on their asses soon, and they're not going to go quietly. There's a blue on blue war about to start, that will far overshadow the red on blue war, at least till it's settled one way or the other. Mark my words.

===

The actual "Dangerous Deplorables" are in the Democratix party, & some have been elected

Learn to defend yourself.  The skill may be needed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BRAINWASHED ! The accidental winner from the "down & outs", sounds like a YoungTurks creation...

Is Pushing her dimwitted SJW issues, with little thought or consistency, except to SJW-ism

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has $7,000 in savings — and that’s more than double most millennials MarketWatch

A.O.C Blocks Ohio Lawmaker on Twitter After Mockery of Her Latest Gaffe Indicating Complete Fail of Civics 101

“What is a chamber of government, @Ocasio2018?” he tweeted.

Ocasio-Cortez angrily responded to the tweet from Antani, and then, apparently blocked him from viewing her account.

“Maybe instead of Republicans drooling over every minute of footage of me in slow-mo, waiting to chop up word slips that I correct in real-tomd [sic],” she fired back without spell-checking...

(quickly co-opted?)

BIZARRE: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Now DEFENDING Nancy Pelosi From Detractors

Newly elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has apparently come far in her admiration for likely Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), going from picketing with environmentalists outside Pelosi's office on her first day in Washington, D.C., to defending the aging Democratic leader against "anti-Pelosi" activists.

Speaking to MSNBC Monday night, Ocasio-Cortez dismissed the group of 16 House Democrats who issued a public letter Monday morning calling on Pelosi to take her name out of contention for the position of Speaker of the House. Ocasio-Cortez attacked the group for its lack of "diversity," and cautioned that leaving Pelosi out of contention could leave the door open to more "conservative" leaders rather than more "progressive" ones.

"If anything, I think that what it does is that it creates a window where we could potentially get more conservative leadership," Ocasio-Cortez said. "When you actually look at the signatories, it is not necessarily reflective of the diversity of the party."

"We have about 16 signatories," she continued. "Fourteen of them are male, there are very few people of color in the caucus, there's very few ideological diversity. It's not like there are progressives that are signing on, it's not like you have a broad-based coalition."

. . . Ocasio-Cortez closed by pledging to vote for Pelosi for Speaker — if, of course, Pelosi is the "most progressive" candidate on the slate.

Oddly enough, Ocasio-Cortez, who frequently makes sweeping proclamations about instituting progressive programs without any clear understanding of what those programs might require, criticized the anti-Pelosi group for lacking a clear plan.

"My main concern was that there is no vision, there is no common value, there is no goal that is really articulated in this letter aside from 'We need to change,'" she added. "If we are not on the same page about changing the systems and the values and how we're going to adapt as a party for the future, then what is the point of just changing our party leadership just for the sake of that?"

Ocasio-Cortez's two positions on Pelosi aren't exactly at odds; it seems like she'd prefer a different Speaker, but is willing to use progressive activism to push Pelosi further to the left, as if the tactic hasn't been tried before. What makes Pelosi a strong leader is that she probably won't easily be swayed by first-term members of Congress with a nationally unpopular agenda.

As for the anti-Pelosi Democrats, they now number around 20, which is enough to deny Pelosi the Speakership if there's another candidate for the role. So far, the best option Democrats have is Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH), but Tuesday, Fudge came under fire for writing a letter of support for an offender in a domestic violence case who is now the principle person of interest in a murder investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Socialist Ocasio-Cortez Just Flip-Flopped On Key Issue – This Will INFURIATE Democrats

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Donald-Trump-Jr-300x169.jpeg

Donald Trump Jr. Master-Trolls Commie Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez With Awesome Meme: Q: ‘Why are You So Afraid of a Socialist Economy?

A: ‘Because Americans Want to Walk Their Dogs, Not Eat Them

/ 2 /

Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-Insane-300x169.

Democrat Darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Already Showing Her Inner Communist Tyrant, Threatens Don Jr.

With ‘Subpoena Power’ After He Mocks Her With Hilarious Meme

Democratic Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) fired back at Donald Trump Jr. on Friday after the president’s eldest son shared a meme implying that her democratic socialist views would lead to Americans eating dogs.

“I have noticed that Junior here has a habit of posting nonsense about me whenever the Mueller investigation heats up,” Ocasio-Cortez said on Twitter. “Please, keep it coming Jr — it’s definitely a ‘very, very large brain’ idea to troll a member of a body that will have subpoena power in a month.” 

“Have fun!” she added.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ETHICS INVESTIGATION INTO SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ AFTER SHE THREATENS DONALD TRUMP JR.

Commenters online are calling for an ethics investigation into Democratic Socialist Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after she threatened Donald Trump Jr. for posting a meme making fun of her.

Donald Trump Jr. shared a meme that featured Ocasio-Cortez on his Instagram that claimed the policies of socialism will cause Americans to eat their dogs. The meme shows two images: one of Ocasio-Cortez with the text, “Why are you so afraid of a socialist economy?” and another image beneath Ocasio-Cortez of President Donald Trump with an overlay of text saying, “Because Americans want to walk their dogs, not eat them.”

Commenters pointed out that the act of threatening to use the power of Congress against other Americans for partisan gain is prohibited by ethics rules.

Sean Davis of the Federalist pointed to House Ethics Manual stipulations that members of Congress are “prohibited from threatening” due to partisan politics and cited the statute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"NO FILTER... She speaks before she thinks"

Ocasio-Cortez Threatens to Abuse Federal Power... Oops!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Win her over with Truth?  Is that really possible?

Why Ocasio-Cortez Must Be Engaged, Critiqued, And Winsomely Trolled

I’ve wondered at times if she were convinced in a partisan neutral setting, could she be convinced of the validity of truth? She thinks that’s what she’s found. 

She’s revealed that she’s ready to weaponize power to shut down voices that mock her. What if we were willing to weaponize ideas to first confront her, and always in an attempt to win her, help her see the ineptness of progressive “solutions.”

All of her political and community organizational experience has led her to the socialist viewpoints that she holds. Claiming power as a popular and in demand lawmaker will do little to reverse that.

However as life changes and people grow more experienced in how living reality measures against ideas they’ve always held it’s not uncommon for someone to be very progressive and liberal in their twenties, and somewhere on the conservative spectrum by age forty. Therefore engagement, solid fact based critique, and accountability are the path we must take. 

We should just never victimize her in the process.

And if we are successful, she’ll know more respect from our side than she’s ever experienced a single day on hers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez threatens to run for president, severely misquotes the Constitution

What happened?
While participating in a photoshoot for Politico at Harvard last Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez engaged in conversation with her photographer, Politico's Playbook reported. According to the recap, Ocasio-Cortez threatened to run for president, but misquoted the Constitution's specific qualifications for the high office.

"You can't even run for president for another six years," the photographer told Ocasio-Cortez, who is just 29 years old. The Constitution requires the U.S. president be at least 35 years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure.  Let them celebrate Failure... a second time

VOX: Let Ocasio-Cortez Run for President...

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the biggest star in the Democratic Party, and she has been ever since she unseated Rep. Joe Crowley in a surprise primary upset in May. That her win didn’t, in the final analysis, launch a wave of leftist primary victories only goes to show what a phenomenon she personally is.

Not everyone shares her brand of politics, of course, but her constituency has exploded beyond the initial set of ideologues who powered the challenge to Crowley because of her incredible wit, charisma, social media savvy, and basic political smarts.

In a year when moderate incumbents generally didn’t lose primary challenges from the left and in which Our Revolution endorsees failed to flip a single GOP-held House seat, AOC constantly dominates the conversation — living rent-free in the heads of conservatives, racking up magazine profiles and Twitter followers, engaging supporters on Instagram in a heretofore unprecedented way, and pulling back the curtain on some of the seamier aspects of “business as usual” in the US Congress.

She’s an outside politician in the best possible sense — quietly loathed by many of her colleagues for beating a well-liked incumbent and being, frankly, more impressive than they are — but still well-liked by normal rank-and-file Democrats. Having spent more time as a bartender than a politician, she has an appealing everywoman persona, and a Latina from the Bronx is the reminder mainstream politics needs that there’s more to working-class life in America than old guys in Appalachian diners.

Yet a completely ridiculous constitutional provision makes her ineligible to run for president.

Young is better than old

While the law prevents anyone under the age of 35 from becoming president, we currently have a septuagenarian in the White House whose frequent nonsensical diatribes and notoriously scattered Twitter outbursts repeatedly raise the prospect of mental decline. Meanwhile, the top two Democrats in national polling — Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden — are 77 and 76, respectively.

. . . Besides which, 29 (Ocasio-Cortez’s age) just honestly isn’t that young. People younger than that are routinely trusted with life-and-death situations in a huge array of contexts, ranging from parenting to military service.

The constitutional prohibition on people under the age of 35 serving as president is just one of these weird lacuna that was handed down to us from the 18th century but that nobody would seriously propose creating today if not for status quo bias. Realistically, most people that young would simply have a hard time winning an election. But if you can pull it off, you should be allowed. And I kind of think she should run for president.

===

(Is the writer of this article, more than 20 yrs old?)

1067497332.jpg.0.jpg

Ocastro is both rather stupid, and lacks useful knowledge of the world.

Maybe she could be turned over to the Witch, as a kind of ritual 'sacrifice' since Huma is getting old now

It is likely that Hillary would like that, and then the witch could be arrested for whatever her rituals involved

/ 2 /

Lib Writer Says Everyone, Including Students & Illegals, Should Run for POTUS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

size matters

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has more Twitter power than media, establishment

Note: Kamala Harris tweets under both a private and a Senate account. Her total is combined; Data: CrowdTangle; Chart: Chris Canipe/Axios

A freshman congresswoman who has held office for less than two weeks is dominating the Democratic conversation on Twitter, generating more interactions — retweets plus likes — than the five most prolific news organizations combined over the last 30 days.

The big picture: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is miles behind President Trump in the influence of her Twitter account. But he's the president — she's a new member of Congress who shot out of a cannon following the midterm elections. And she has far more power on Twitter than the most prominent Democrats, including the congressional leaders and the likely 2020 presidential candidates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OCastro label as Bigot

Fox News’ Laura Ingraham Rants About Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, ‘Minority Privilege’

Fox News host Laura Ingraham ranted about “minority privilege” as she attacked Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) for criticizing her on Twitter.

Ocasio-Cortez wrote last week that Fox News had “crossed a line beyond conservatism and into outright bigotry” with its financing of Ingraham and fellow host Tucker Carlson.

Read more: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn! https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz5d717Awx8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you should really brush up on your understanding of political terms if you want to devote so much time commenting on it.

"regressive" would be someone calling for more regressive taxes like VAT/sales tax

"hard left" would be someone calling for the abolition of private ownership.

AOC is not advocating either of these. (but there are plenty of politicos that do, Ford motor company fiasco being the most recent example where loads of them came out of the woodwork)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to change the whole word, Sparks, not me.

Since everyone calls her those things, except you

===

Ocastro is Stupidity & virtue-signaling on Steroids.

Listen to her play Fan girl to a famous Tranny, Embarrassing !

On the eve of the Women’s March, Bronx socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to Instagram to update her supporters from her kitchen.

Then she lost control when she realized a celebrity drag queen was in her virtual midst

> http://www.theamericanmirror.com/ocasio-cortez-invites-herself-on-rupauls-drag-race-after-celebrity-drag-queen-joins-instagram-livestream/

She continues to behave like a 16-year old "queen" of Social media - What a Dingbat !

She is 30 years old now,  The bitty should grow-the-f--k up !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The nutty Nebraska school principal who banned candy canes has the same wild look as Ocastro

image-62-fac87.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&

Grinchy Leftist Principal Who Banned Candy Canes, Christmas Music, Christmas Colors, Resigns

A “grinchy” Nebraska elementary school principal has resigned after banning red and green decorations at Christmas, candy canes and even Christmas music.

WND reported the ban by Jennifer Sinclair of Manchester Elementary School in the Elkhorn Public Schools District was reversed after a warning from Liberty Counsel.

She had declared there would be no “Christmas colors,” carols, reindeer or books with Christmas themes at her school.

Sinclair told faculty and staff, “We are not to be doing any Christmas or holiday-specific themed activities with students.”

. . .

Liberty Counsel sent a letter to Supt. Bary Habrock asking for Sinclair’s ban to be overturned.

The letter asserted her actions were unconstitutional, showing “hostility toward Christianity.”

The organization told the district, “The First Amendment simply does not require elimination of all Christmas symbols – religious and secular – in a misguided attempt to be ‘inclusive’ by eliminating all traditional elements of a federally- and state-recognized holiday.

“The effort to comprehensively eliminate Christmas symbols is Orwellian.”

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/grinchy-principal-who-banned-christmas-colors-resigns/#QGgTHwc3BGjQEteZ.99

===

Orwellian?  Possibly. O-Bitchian?  Certainly

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/grinchy-principal-who-banned-christmas-colors-resigns/#QGgTHwc3BGjQEteZ.99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Laura Loomer Confronts Democrat Darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at Feminazi ‘Women’s’ March:

‘Why are You Standing With People Who Openly Support Hamas, a Terrorist Organization That Kills Jewish People?’

While participating in demonstrations with a Women's March group near Central Park, a CNN reporter confronted Ocasio-Cortez about anti-Semitism in the Women's March movement. Instead of answering the question, Ocasio-Cortez rambled about the Trump administration, claiming, without evidence, the White House has an anti-Semitism problem.

"Well first of all, I think that right now, in this moment in the United States, we have to center this conversation. I think that concerns of anti-Semitism with the current administration in the White House are absolutely valid and we need to make sure that we are protecting the Jewish community and all those that feel vulnerable in this moment," Ocasio-Cortez said.

Ocasio-Cortez neither addressed the growing problem with the Women's March movement, nor did she denounce the alleged anti-Semitism that exists among its ranks.

(lying Bitty):

'x

In another clip, right-wing activist Laura Loomer is seen confronting Ocasio-Cortez.

"Why are you standing with people who openly support Hamas, a terrorist organization that kills Jewish people?" Loomer asked as Ocasio-Cortez walked past her.

Ocasio-Cortez did not answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, drbubb said:

You need to change the whole word, Sparks, not me.

Since everyone calls her those things, except you

===

Ocastro is Stupidity & virtue-signaling on Steroids.

Listen to her play Fan girl to a famous Tranny, Embarrassing !

On the eve of the Women’s March, Bronx socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to Instagram to update her supporters from her kitchen.

Then she lost control when she realized a celebrity drag queen was in her virtual midst

> http://www.theamericanmirror.com/ocasio-cortez-invites-herself-on-rupauls-drag-race-after-celebrity-drag-queen-joins-instagram-livestream/

She continues to behave like a 16-year old "queen" of Social media - What a Dingbat !

She is 30 years old now,  The bitty should grow-the-f--k up !

Everyone being paid to smear her and confuse you uses those words.

Everyone else has pretty standard definitions, and looks on such garbage like you look at a toddler that just learnt how to lie.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regressive_tax

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property

You might be better going back to flat earth, at least talking about that you didn't sound so profoundly ignorant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" Everyone being paid to smear her and confuse you ..."

Right GEI & my opinion is so important, that people must be paid to influence it.

The NYT here is probably being paid too, right?  ... To celebrate the insanity of these delusional young women

Beware the Furies, President Trump - Maureen Dowd

merlin_149401290_e1f82e0e-0797-4330-8755

Who elected these aggressive & deranged young women?  Brainwashed SJW's.

Brainwashed by our dysfunctional educational system, and the liestream media

WASHINGTON — After I’d been writing a column for a few years, a male boss gave me a T-shirt depicting the Furies swooping.

He didn’t mean it as a compliment.

The three sisters, the “infernal goddesses” of ancient mythology born from the blood shed by Uranus when he was castrated by his son, were known for relentlessly hounding men. But the Furies took vengeance on wicked men who hurt women and swore false oaths.

So I took it as a compliment.

The capital has suddenly been infused with the spirit of the Furies. After many false springs and discouraging backlashes, we are finally experiencing a revolutionary assertion of women’s power that is transforming Congress.

“Kill Bill”-style, the fiery Democratic women keep coming, driven by vengeance against the wicked man in the White House with the history of hurting women and swearing false oaths.

. . . Swooping toward 2020, the moment of truth for Donald Trump that is also aptly the centennial of women’s suffrage, the women are gathering force at a giddy speed.

This was not a good week to be a dude in politics.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her girl squad — fellow freshmen lawmakers Katie Hill of California, Lauren Underwood of Illinois and Jahana Hayes of Connecticut — tracked Mitch McConnell to petition him to have a vote to reopen the government. The Senate majority leader has been trying to lay doggo as Trump thrashes after pulling the rug out from under McConnell.

> more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/trump-ocasio-cortez-dowd.html

LOOK, I am not letting this insanity pass, without comment..

 

Here's a documentary showing how brainwashing was implemented at Evergreen University

PART ONE: Bret Weinstein, Heather Heying & the Evergreen Equity Council

It is excellent - Scary !

These women are breath-takingly stupid, and ill-educated.  They & their dangerous ideas can do great damage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, drbubb said:

Right GEI & my opinion is so important, that people must be paid to influence it.

The NYT here is probably being paid too, right?  ... To celebrate the insanity of these delusional young women

You'd be surprised.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

Has come a long way in the last decade. 

It's one of the reasons I rarely read English material any more. Ruskie was always much better quality even before that shit grew to the epic proportions it is today.

Not that I'm really complaining. Much better that American tax dollars all go on keeping Americans stupid than educating them or keeping them alive. It was also really useful in helping us get Trump elected. 

7 hours ago, drbubb said:

These women are breath-takingly stupid, and ill-educated.  They & their dangerous ideas can do great damage

I think the problem is they are a little bit too educated. But otherwise agreed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PROOF that Dems are like Foolish Children

What is it with them: Spoiled? Resentful? Trump-hating?  Resentful?

(all things they are taught in the failing educational system)

I Give 'Zero' F*cks...
POLL: 74% of Dems would vote for her for president!

Rather predictably, AOC and a few other vocal freshman members of congress have been told by senior politicians to "wait your turn, go slow," as Colbert put it. AOC has been quick to make a name for herself for her incisive tweets and fiery Twitter takedowns of GOP members. 

Colbert asked her a question that a few us probably already know the answer to: "On a scale of zero to some, how many fucks do you give?" Colbert asked her. 

"I think it's, uuuh, zero," replies AOC. 

(She should hug Colbert's neck, leg a dead albatross, and stay there. He deserves her. We don't.)

A new Axios/SurveyMonkey poll finds that 74% of Democrats (and people who lean Dem) would consider voting for Ocasio-Cortez if she were old enough to run for president. (She's 29; you have to be at least 35.)

  • That includes the 17% who would "definitely" vote for her.
  • Jon Cohen, SurveyMonkey's chief research officer, tells me: "These data show the phenomenon is real — she tops Sen. Schumer in favorability among Democrats and overall nearly rivals Speaker Pelosi."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×