Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

AOC / Ocasio, Hard Left Regressive Female = New face of Dems

Recommended Posts

‘Keep telling yourself that’: Bless her heart, here’s why AOC thinks the ‘GOP’s getting scared’

The pendulum has swung back in the other direction, and perpetual victim Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is back to being a stunning and brave bee in the GOP’s bonnet. At least according to her:
AbHcStkl_normal.jpg GOP’s getting scared that up close, their constituents will realize I’m fighting harder for their healthcare than their own Reps
S. Zawicki's reply:
I have healthcare. You are fighting to take money outta my paycheck to buy insurance for other people

David M.:

Trust me, we're not worried about your wild ideas. Stick to what you know, making cocktails.

VotEEE :

I can assure you I do not think you are fighting for me. You are fighting for giving government more control. Don't ever speak for me again.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, drbubb said:

S. Zawicki'


29 minutes ago, drbubb said:

David M.


29 minutes ago, drbubb said:


dont seem to understand the meaning of "will".

therefore almost certainly dont understand that private health insurance companies only offer health insurance to people who dont need it, and will withdraw their cover as soon as they are to sick to work.

What happened to


Trump promised! :(

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the "Poster child of unaccountable Toxic Femininity"

Ocasio-Cortez Lists Tax Cuts and the Census as Reasons to Impeach Trump

The phrase ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ must be too many syllables for her to understand.

New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was asked during an interview on Yahoo News’ “Skullduggery” podcast this past weekend if she supports impeaching President Trump.

As with most thoughts, the Democrat socialist struggled to convey any rational reasons for supporting such a bold and significant move.

“I think you could reach in a bag and pull so many things out that are impeachable of this president,” she claimed. “I support impeaching this president.”

So many things …

That’s when the interviewers asked her to cite three specific ‘things.’

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drbubb said:

s with most thoughts, the Democrat socialist struggled to convey any rational reasons for supporting such a bold and significant move

do you have a link to the actual interview.

We are surely capable of making up our own minds and dont need what really happened opinion and propaganda thrown in to something as straight forward as an interview. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

ILLOGICAL, IMMATURE, ill-prepared, non-accountable, over-emotional....

These are reasons the Little Bitty does not belong at the "tippy-tops" of power.

Put Candace Owens there, and watch her grow into something remarkable.

Meantime, AOC just shows us all the reasons that some people think it was a mistake to given women the vote

- She is the poster-child for Toxic Feminity, and has already earned years of cruel ridicule

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will Ocasio get Trashed?

Republican Millionaire "Hell bent" On REMOVING Ocasio-Cortez

Republican Millionaire "Hell bent" On REMOVING Ocasio-Cortez.

After the loss of the Amazon deal Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez saw her approval and favorability plummet. AOC Claimed this was due to right wing propaganda but that claim would seem absurd considering people in her district likely don't watch Fox News or right wing sources. But now the far left Ocasio-Cortez faces a wave of challengers from the Republican party as many people feel she is neglecting her district. The self described democratic socialist will have to contend with the entirety of the Democratic establishment and now Republicans as well. With polls showing that far left 2020 democrats are not fairing too well it seems like she has a real challenge ahead of her. Democrats have floated eliminating her district, setting her up with a primary challenger, and have often disparaged AOC and her progressive group. While many people will claim the Green New Deal is favored by Americans, not one Democrat voted to support the bill in fact several voted "no"

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make Little Bitty Accountable Again?

Ocasio-Cortez Holds 'Green New Deal' Fun Run; Participants Don't Realize Where Money Is Really Going


 Some of the participants of a "family fun run" that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez promoted as supporting her Green New Deal were unaware that their registration fees were actually going directly to the campaign of the freshman congresswoman rather than "helping the environment." By presenting the event in ambiguous terms, the New York Post notes, the freshman congresswoman "may have enticed constituents into inadvertently breaking federal election laws."


The Post attended the event, held in Queens on Saturday, and chatted with a few of its participants. What the paper found is that, unsurprisingly, some of the 398 participants appeared to be confused about where exactly the more than $11,000 raised by their registration fees was going.
Why the confusion? The website for the democratic socialist's event presented it as "a Family Fun Run supporting U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal":

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

AOC sounds like a Demented 12 year old

After her recent move to Washington D.C., Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has allegedly discovered what a garbage disposal is, describing it as “terrifying” in a series of photos and videos she shared to her Instagram account.

“This DC apartment is bougie and has things I’ve never seen before. Like what is a garbage disposal really for,” Ocasio-Cortez asked in the video caption. “Is it better or worse to than throwing something in the garbage? Most importantly why is it so loud and yelling at me?

AOC saying she’s never seen a garbage disposal and then proceeding to ask if it’s environmentally sound made me lose brain cells

> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/07/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-discovers-a-garbage-disposal-asks-if-it-is-environmentally-sound/

Only a Democrat would look up to such an obvious moron

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

LITTLE BITTY just keeps stepping in it


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) ate it last week.

No, it wasn’t about the Green New Deal, which is a recipe for economic disaster; it was a poorly executed counterattack against…the media. Yep, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is running for the Democratic nomination in 2020, so you’re whole life goes under the microscope. Y’all know the drill. It so happens that she had quite the legal career as well, charging $675/hour and worked on over 50 legal cases. CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski simply tweeted about this dot on Warren’s resume, which AOC thought was an attack, pulled the trigger, but got face-full of buckshot instead. You see—the article was written by two female reporters from The Washington Post; Kaczynski didn’t even write it. AOC thought his comment about it on Twitter was sexist. Daily Wire has more:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little Bitty Whining... this time about her Work Load

Time to go back to waitressing, AOC?

he civil war between the Democratic Party’s left flank and extreme left flank is heating up.

Days after Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi mocked Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and trio of her freshmen colleagues — Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) — for focusing on Twitter and PR at the expense of legislation, AOC issued another broadside against Pelosi. 

"All these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world," Pelosi told the New York Times’ Maureen Dowd published Saturday. "But they didn't have any following. They're four people and that's how many votes they got."

Today in an interview with WNYC’s “New Yorker Hour,” AOC accused Pelosi of intentionally saddling her with work to keep her out of the spotlight.

“I was assigned to some of the busiest committees and four subcommittees,” AOC said. “So my hands are full. And sometimes I wonder if they’re trying to keep me busy.”

The New York lawmaker had been describing why she declined Pelosi’s offer to sit on a standing committee on climate change. AOC said she declined the Speaker’s offer after she had refused AOC’s demands for what the committee should do. 

Asked about how the relationship with Pelosi is generally, AOC deadpanned: “I think sometimes people think that we have a relationship.”

Here’s an excerpt from the exchange:

HOST: “What’s your relationship like with Nancy Pelosi. Tell me how that works, what are the dynamics of it?”

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “You know, I think sometimes people think that we have this — like we have a relationship.” (Laughter)

HOST: “Are you saying you don’t?”

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “Not, not particularly, not one that’s I think distinguished from anyone else. Like if there’s a legislative need, you know. The last time I kind of spoke to her one on one was when she asked me to join the Select Committee on Climate Change.”

HOST: “What did you say.”

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “I said no.” (Laughter)

HOST: “Why?”

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “Because I had made very specific requests which I thought were rather reasonable for the Select Committee on Climate Change. I asked that it have a mission to try to draft legislation by 2020 so that — so that we essentially have a 2 year mission to put together whether it’s a Green New Deal or whether it’s some sweeping climate change legislation that — that the select committee have a legislative mission. I asked for it to have subpoena power which most committees do. The last — the last select committee had subpoena power but now this one doesn’t. And I asked for the members who sit on the select committee to not take any fossil fuel money. And none of those requests were accommodated, and so I didn’t join the committee.”

HOST: “Are you better on the outside looking in or the inside looking out?” [crosstalk]

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “I think — I think I’m better on the outside looking in, on this issue.”

HOST: “Why is that?”

OCASIO-CORTEZ: “Because given that none of those standards were met sitting on that committee I would have to own anything — I would take responsibility for anything that comes out of that committee. And when the actual my opinion, the structure of it, is compromised in very deep ways, you know it’s not — I don’t think it was like I’m going to take my ball and go home, it’s we have a select committee whose mission — I’m — I was uncertain on who’s members take fossil fuel money. You know it’s — it’s beyond just a mere disagreement I think there’s a structural problem with it. And so — and there are plenty of other caucuses as well that work on climate issues. So I think — I think that that ultimately I’m fine with the decision especially given the committee assignments that I was ultimately given, which were very intense and very rigorous. I was assigned to two of some of the busiest committees and four subcommittees so my hands are full, and sometimes I (wonder if) they’re trying to keep me busy.” (Laughter)
She gets sued for blocking people on TWITTER...

On Tuesday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled President Trump is not allowed to block people on his Twitter account, because the social-media page was used for “official purposes” and such a move would violate the First Amendment.


Within hours, one of the far-left newcomers to Congress who has done the same thing, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., also was sued.

The Associated Press reported the decision in Trump’s case “is likely to reverberate throughout politics after the Manhattan court warned that any elected official using a social-media account ‘for all manner of official purposes’ and then excluding critics violates free speech.”

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/now-aoc-gets-sued-for-blocking-people-on-twitter/#AcLujcSuqXV7palP.99


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


She gets more "victim points" that you do!


Democrat Jihad Squad Leader Alexandria Occasional-Cortex Gets a New 2020 Challenger:

A Republican Immigrant Businesswoman From Jamaica, Sherie Murray: ‘Your Representative in Washington Chooses Self-Promotion Over Service, Conflict Over Constituents’

“There is a crisis in Queens, and it’s called AOC,” Murray told Fox News. “And instead of focusing on us, she’s focusing on being famous. Mainly rolling back progress and authoring the job-killing Green New Deal and killing the Amazon New York deal.”

Murray, who was born in Jamaica and moved to the United States when she was 9, is officially launching her campaign Wednesday with an introductory video that takes sharp jabs at the 29-year-old Ocasio-Cortez.

'There is a crisis in Queens, and it’s called AOC.'

— Scherie Murray

“Your representative in Washington chooses self-promotion over service, conflict over constituents, resistance over assistance," Murray said in the video. "Queens and the Bronx needs someone who will create jobs instead of turning them away."

Asked about Ocasio-Cortez’s brand of Democratic socialism, Murray said, “I think it’s far, far to the left and it is not connecting with everyday Americans.”

As for "Medicare-for-all," which Ocasio-Cortez has embraced, the Republican said: “Medicare-for-all, I think a lot of people are happy with their current health insurance.” And on the Green New Deal, the left-wing proposal to address climate change pushed by Ocasio-Ortez, she said: “We know that it certainly will kill jobs.”

. . . Whichever Republican candidate emerges from the primary field will face a steep uphill climb in the overwhelmingly Democratic district. But Murray and others are looking to paint Ocasio-Cortez as more of a celebrity than a lawmaker, while stressing their ability to work across party lines.

/ 2 /

Ocasio-Cortez targeted by mystery multimillionaire donor

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s surging national profile has inspired a trio of Republican opponents from her home district — along with a multimillionaire mystery donor who could help close the gap in her foes’ long-shot race against her.

Just three months after taking office, the Democratic socialist congresswoman’s challengers include an Egyptian American journalist, who has already tossed her hat in the ring, and an NYPD cop-turned-high school civics teacher and conservative talk radio producer, both of whom are seriously exploring a run against her.

And the fledgling challengers could get help from a wealthy New Yorker committed to backing an Ocasio-Cortez opponent, a GOP big said.

“There’s definitely national energy and money on this race,” Bronx Republican chairman Mike Rendino told The Post, adding that he has been in touch with a mega-bucks donor hell-bent on getting AOC tossed.

Rendino wouldn’t divulge the donor’s name but said the individual is “worth over $200 million, plus [has] connections to raise money in Manhattan.”

Tom Doherty, a former deputy to former Gov. George Pataki, said a Republican challenger to AOC would be able to “raise real national money.

“We need to put individuals forward and make the incumbent work for re-election,” Doherty said.

The three potential contenders agree on one thing: They believe Ocasio-Cortez has neglected her district, which encompasses a northeast section of the Bronx including Throgs Neck and Parkchester and a northwest portion of Queens including Jackson Heights and College Point.

It took the congresswoman two months to open a district office in Queens.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


AOC’s Just-Resigned Chief Of Staff Under Federal Investigation

It looks like we have an answer for why Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief-of-staff abruptly resigned on Friday; he’s under federal investigation.

source: www.zerohedge.com
by Tyler Durden

According to the New York Post, Saikat Chakrabarti – the architect behind AOC’s meteoric rise from bartender to ball-buster, is being investigated in connection with two political action committees he founded.

The two PACs being probed, Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats, were both set up by Chakrabarti to support progressive candidates across the country.

But they funneled more than $1 million in political donations into two private companies that Chakrabarti also incorporated and controlled, according to Federal Election Commission filings and a complaint filed in March with the regulatory agency.

In 2016 and 2017, the PACs raised about $3.3 million, mostly from small donors. A third of the cash was transferred to two private companies whose names are similar to one of the PACs — Brand New Congress LLC and Brand New Campaign LLC — federal campaign filings show. –New York Post

As the Post notes, PACs are required to adhere to stringent disclosure rules, while the private companies Chakrabarti funneled money into are not.

Ocasio Cortez Chief Of Staff Faces Federal Investigation Over Potential Campaign Finance Violations

Published on Aug 4, 2019

Ocasio Cortez Ex-Chief Of Staff Faces Federal Investigation After Abrupt Resignation. Saikat Chakrabarti is reportedly facing a federal probe having to do with the unorthodox way he conducted his campaigning businesses. Complaints had been filed over the way his private entities were handling cash, operating as LLC's instead of PAC's.


They need to throw the book at Little Bitty and Chuck Roboti

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

AOC Still completely crazy after all these Crazed months

She wants to TAX everyone, and hand out money to those she favors... so she can feel she is good

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is promoting a new package of left-wing economic policies, including national rent control and expanding welfare to illegal immigrants across the country, as part of a massive new proposal aiming to achieve a “just society.”

The freshman lawmaker, who champions the multi-trillion-dollar Green New Deal proposal to combat economic inequality and climate change, has now proposed a package of bills aimed at solving perceived economic injustice.

“A just society provides a living wage, safe working conditions, and healthcare. A just society acknowledges the value of immigrants to our communities. A just society guarantees safe, comfortable, and affordable housing,” the website for the package says.

“By strengthening our social and economic foundations, we are preparing ourselves to embark on the journey to save our planet by rebuilding our economy and cultivate a just society.”

That “Just Society” proposals are made up of six different pieces of legislation that deal with issues including housing, welfare, poverty and human rights.

/ 2 /

Woman at an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez town hall urges people to 'Get rid of the babies!' to fight climate change

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, drbubb said:

AOC Still completely crazy after all these Crazed months

....Just Society” proposals are made up of six different pieces of legislation that deal with issues including housing, welfare, poverty and human rights.

/ 2 /

Woman at an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez town hall urges people to 'Get rid of the babies!' to fight climate change

IT WAS A TROLL, you idiots !

Yes, We Should Definitely All Troll Democrat Candidates Like the ‘We Need to Eat Babies’ Lady Brilliantly Did to Expose Alexandria Ocrazio-Cortex

Go Ye and Do Likewise

I should think that it’s obvious why we all need to get on the stick and start pulling more such pranks. As it surely says somewhere in the Bible, “Go ye and do likewise.” (Sorry, as a Catholic I’m better at quoting Tolkien.)

But maybe you’re in the mood for me to be pedantic. So here you go: Candidates who claim that every child born helps to end the world within a decade should be forced to clarify that they don’t want us eating babies.

And of course the Democrats don’t. They do want us killing them. And selling them in Styrofoam containers like KFC chicken parts. You know, the way Planned Parenthood does.

And when Planned Parenthood does that, the Democrats fight like amorous tomcats to keep on shoveling them hundreds of taxpayers’ millions.

And when a journalist exposes that? The Democrats get their marching orders directly from Planned Parenthood, and arrest him. They seize his videos and all his equipment. They try to put him in prison. You know, the way Kamala Harris did as California attorney general.

Shouldn’t every pro-LGBT candidate today have to face “supporters” praising the freedom of sex offenders to dress up in drag and rub their fake boobs on little kids?

But eat the babies? No. We’re not there. Yet. Give it five more years before Ecological Veal goes on the menu. We need to force the Democrats to talk about that before it happens.

MEANTIME. Little Bitty trolls herself

Really? Ocrazio-Cortex Accuses President Trump of Being Mad at Adam Schiff Because He’s Jewish

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

What The ‘Eating Babies’ Troll Job Said About AOC Is Pretty Terrifying


Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, and so it was with the brouhaha that took place during a Queens town hall hosted by New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday. In case you’ve been living under a rock and somehow missed it, a woman wearing a “Save the Planet, Eat the Children” t-shirt interrupted the proceedings and demanded that people “start eating babies” in response to climate change.

Stating that we only have “a few months left” to save the planet, the woman immediately fast forwarded to the most extreme of ‘solutions.’

“We have to start eating babies,” she said. “We do not have enough time. There’s too much CO2. All of you, you are polluting. Too much CO2. We have to start now ... Even if we bomb Russia, we have too many people, too much pollution. So we have to get rid of the babies. That is the big problem. Just stopping having babies is not enough. We need to eat the babies.”

Even before we knew the woman wasn’t a constituent or likely even an AOC supporter, babies on the menu to save the earth did seem a bit extreme, even by today’s absurd, climate change cult standards. So it was no huge surprise when the whole thing turned out to be a stunt put on by a right wing political cult once led by Lyndon LaRouche. Even so, the real news wasn’t just simply what the woman said, but also how Ocasio-Cortez responded:

“One of the things that’s very important to us is that we need to treat the climate crisis with the urgency that it does present,” she said calmly, almost meekly. “Luckily, we have more than a few months. We do need to hit net zero in several years, but I think we all need to understand that there are a lot of solutions that we have, that we can pursue. And that if we act in a positive way, there is space for hope. We are never beyond hope.”

The New York congresswoman wrote later she thought the woman was suffering from some sort of “mental condition,” so she wanted to “de-escalate” the situation. Fine, but for gosh sakes, mental condition or not, a person just stood up in public and asked you to endorse literally murdering babies and, uh, eating them. Wouldn’t a nice, calm, de-escalating go a little like ‘Uh, no, we definitely aren’t condoning eating children, but thanks for your comments and please see the nice men with the straight jackets to the left’ have been way better? 

Put it this way. What if a white male had stood up at Ocasio-Cortez’s town hall and openly called for, say, discriminating against a minority group to save the planet? (No, that doesn’t make sense, but neither does killing babies. Work with me here!) How do you think she would have reacted, even if the man had seemed mentally disturbed. Obviously, any politician, from the most conservative Republican to the most liberal Democrat, would have immediately and rightly refuted that person with a strong, ‘No, we’re not going to discriminate against anyone!’

So no, AOC doesn’t get a pass because she thought the eating baby woman was mentally disturbed. Quite the contrary, the ‘logic’ behind her actual response is disturbing. If you read between the lines, Ocasio-Cortez basically lauded the woman for her sense of urgency, then merely walks it back a few notches by contending that we have “more than a few months.” (Twelve years, to be specific, but we won’t quibble.) And we have “lots of solutions,” so let’s not resort to eating our young just yet. 

. . .

“AOC doesn’t rule out eating babies,” LaRouche PAC tweeted after the stunt, taking credit for what they fully expected to happen.

If the LaRouch political cult (of which, for the record, I’m not a fan) wanted to show that eating babies is really only a few steps away from current insane leftist environmental policy proposals, they certainly succeeded. In the name of ‘saving the earth,’ these climate-change lunatics want to take us beyond the stone age, to a place where human life is secondary not just to their warped view of what a sustainable planet looks like, but to leftist power and control. 

/ 2 /

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glenn Beck appreciates the Troll

Crazy, or 'genius' troll? AOC voter wants to 'eat babies' and children to save the planet


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMAGINE... have Ms Bitty as your mother!

The Joker should be so lucky

Watch: Ocasio-Cortez Says Dreams of Motherhood ‘Taste Bittersweet’ Due to Climate Change

AOC Sez Dreams of Motherhood ‘Taste Bittersweet’ Due to Climate Change

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said during a speech at the C40 World Mayors Summit in Copenhagen that her dreams of motherhood now “taste bittersweet” due to climate change.

The freshman lawmaker delivered a speech at the summit this week and emotionally declared that her dreams of motherhood “taste bittersweet” because of climate change and the impact it will have on “our children’s future.”

“I speak to you not as an elected official or public figure. But I speak to you as a human being,” she began.

“A woman whose dreams of motherhood now taste bittersweet because of what I know about our children’s future and that our actions are responsible for bringing their most dire possibilities into focus,” she continued, audibly holding back tears.

“I speak to you as a daughter and descendant of colonized peoples who have already begun to suffer,” she added, citing the thousands of Puerto Rican lives lost due to Hurricane Maria, which she described as a “climate change powered storm.”

She said her grandfather died in the aftermath along with others, all because “they were living under colonial rule, which contributed to the dire conditions and lack of recovery.”

. . . “I think having a mixed family is part of my personal planning. But it’s really hard, and I don’t think sometimes that older generations understand how much we’re taking this into account,” she added:


When you hear a Lefty use the words, "I speak as...." You know someone is trying to manipulate you with propaganda.

MIXED Family, eh?

I do hope she holds off

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this