Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Killing Fake News - Can Trump do it?

Recommended Posts

MORE Fake News HorseFeathers

The odds on Donald Trump's impeachment or resignation are now equivalent to almost 45 percent

Newsweek· 2 days ago

Most notably, the odds on Trump’s presidency ending before the end of 2018 were cut in half by Irish bookmaker Paddy Power following a flood of bets. The change in ...

===

When this proves to be another Lie, shouldn't someone be Fired, Exposed & Deeply Embarrassed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The STUPIDITY of this Headline is breath-taking:

The president, they say, tells it like it is, or at least the way they think it once was and should be again. Why do these men, who I think generally take great pride in their ...

The LIES it is support:

+ Donald Trump is not tough. He is a phony

+ Only White Men are supporting Trump

Paul, you utter pice of crap:

Why do so many weak pussies not notice the bias in your pulsilanimous writing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-david-janda-death-of-the-fake-news-media-will-be-the-death-of-the-deep-state/

DR DAVID JANDA: DEATH OF THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA WILL BE THE DEATH OF THE DEEP STATE

“The lamestream fake media is an important tentacle to the Deep State. [It’s] their propaganda arm and if the propaganda arm dies, it starts to die all the way up to the head of the snake…”

“[Whether you] love Trump or hate Trump; bottom line: Trump is ripping down and shredding the iron curtain…of dis- and misinformation that the Deep State has constructed over the past number of decades…

“I made a prediction on Greg Hunter’s show, USA Watchdog…that, as the primaries come to an end, we’re gonna see more and more information start leaking out and we are gonna start to see some indictments come forward.

…The more educated we are about the facts, the more empowered we become and the more empowered we become, the sooner the Deep State meets its end.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Google search results for “Trump News” shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake New Media. In other words, they have it RIGGED, for me & others, so that almost all stories & news is BAD. Fake CNN is prominent. Republican/Conservative & Fair Media is shut out. Illegal? 96% of...

...results on “Trump News” are from National Left-Wing Media, very dangerous. Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives and hiding information and news that is good. They are controlling what we can & cannot see. This is a very serious situation-will be addressed!

 

/ 2 /

Google Responds To Trump, Says "Doesn't Bias Search Results"

Following an accusation by president Trump that Google was "rigging" search results against him, providing as evidence a "Trump News" search which showed predominantly "left" media publications popping up in the search results...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

United States Antitrust Law

....is a collection of federal and state government laws that regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations, generally to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers. (The concept is called competition law in other English-speaking countries.) The main statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914 and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. These Acts, first, restrict the formation of cartels and prohibit other collusive practices regarded as being in restraint of trade. Second, they restrict the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that could substantially lessen competition. Third, they prohibit the creation of a monopoly and the abuse of monopoly power.

. . . One view, mostly closely associated with the "Chicago School of economics" suggests that antitrust laws should focus solely on the benefits to consumers and overall efficiency, while a broad range of legal and economic theory sees the role of antitrust laws as also controlling economic power in the public interest

 

Media

Third, antitrust laws are modified where they are perceived to encroach upon the media and free speech, or are not strong enough. Newspapers under joint operating agreements are allowed limited antitrust immunity under the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970.[38]More generally, and partly because of concerns about media cross-ownership in the United States, regulation of media is subject to specific statutes, chiefly the Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, under the guidance of the Federal Communications Commission. The historical policy has been to use the state's licensing powers over the airwaves to promote plurality. Antitrust laws do not prevent companies from using the legal system or political process to attempt to reduce competition. Most of these activities are considered legal under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. Also, regulations by states may be immune under the Parker immunity doctrine

500px-U.S._Department_of_Justice_headqua.

. . . The federal government, via both the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, can bring civil lawsuits enforcing the laws. The United States Department of Justice alone may bring criminal antitrust suits under federal antitrust laws.[43] Perhaps the most famous antitrust enforcement actions brought by the federal government were the break-up of AT&T's local telephone service monopoly in the early 1980s[44] and its actions against Microsoft in the late 1990s.

> WIKI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Joe ConchaVerified account @JoeConchaTV
Very difficult to see how CNN can continue to stand by its July 27 Michael Cohen/Trump Tower story given its own formerly-anonymous source is now openly admitting to lying about it on the network. Retraction seems to be the only recourse here:

Joe Concha added,

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg
Lanny Davis has told BuzzFeed News that he was an anonymous source for CNN's Trump Tower bombshell, a story he now disputes. He also regrets lying about his involvement, on CNN's own air, in an interview with Anderson Cooper last week https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stevenperlberg/lanny-davis-cnn-trump-tower-story 
6:34 PM - 27 Aug 2018

 

 

Back pedaling: CNN's new form of transportation.

 

 

Weird Chick Retweeted Steven Perlberg

"It's not false reporting if we really. really, REALLY want it to be true."—CNN

 

 

That's quite problematic, for CNN! However, they are so far gone, as a reputable News Source, that it may not matter at this point.

 

 

We're in the Orwellian world of the left where facts don't matter. Only the narrative matters, and if they push the narrative hard enough, it will become fact. “We do not merely destroy our enemies; we change them.” ― George Orwell, 1984

 

DlpsnUdU0AEI0yF.jpg

 

 

 

Dls2G4HU8AACqc2.jpg

 

 

truth_sauce33 @TSauce33 22h22 hours ago
People forget the news media does not have to be truthful, because they can legally spread propaganda to the American people. So CNN never has to retract a report they KNOW is false.

 

 

cnn retract? ha does not fit their narrative

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg 22h22 hours ago
Lanny Davis called to add that he did not lie to Anderson Cooper, but says he "unintentionally misspoke" re his role in the CNN Trump Tower story

 

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg 5h5 hours ago
CNN has a new Lanny Davis story out after he told BuzzFeed News yesterday that he was an anonymous source for CNN's Trump Tower story. @jimsciutto reports that the network stands by story, which had more than one source
 

 

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg 4h4 hours ago
Still kind of a mystery to me why @jimsciutto and @carlbernstein can't just write in their own words that Lanny Davis was one of their sources — he told me so himself on the record! Also lol can BuzzFeed News get a LINK
Dltls70X0AETBxv.jpg
 

 

 

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg 20m20 minutes ago
CBS News, which had confirmed CNN’s Trump Tower story last month thanks to background source Lanny Davis, has also updated its story https://www.cbsnews.com/news/updated-claims-about-trumps-knowledge-of-trump-tower-meeting-revised/ 
DluefD2U0AEV0Hu.jpg
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Utter Propaganda and LIES.

And when exposed, No APOLOGIES

Fake News 'at its finest' > actually: At its WORST.

There really ought to be some serious consequences for such FALSE REPORTING.

Firings, fines, broadcast licenses lost... that sort of thing.

=====

mSparks Lacks DISCERNMENT !!!!

Meantime, here on GEI, Sparks spread the Lies, even as I warned him about Cohen's lack of consistency in his stories = Zero Credibility

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NvKE 'EM!

POTUS should Call down the Full Force of anti-Trust law on these Unpatriotic Bastids!

th?id=OIP.TaS--o3zsIjKkPd6igCSVwHaD3&w=2

THE ANTI-SOCIALS...
TRUMP WARNS FACEBOOKGOOGLETWITTER...
Regulation looms?
GOOGLE CEO Refuses to Testify at Senate Hearing...
Unease in The Valley...

"tredding on very troubled territory"

President Trump twice hit out at tech giants on Tuesday, raising the stakes for companies that are already in the political firing line.

In early morning tweets, Trump contended that “Google search results for ‘Trump News’ shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake News Media. In other words, they have it RIGGED.”

He added: “Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives and hiding information and news that is good.”

Later in the day, briefly addressing the media at an Oval Office meeting with FIFA President Gianni Infantino, Trump broadened his critique saying, “I think that Google and Twitter and Facebook, they’re really treading on very, very troubled territory. And they have to be careful.”

Google moved swiftly to push back on the president’s tweets. A statement from the search giant said in part: "Search is not used to set a political agenda and we don't bias our results toward any political ideology...We never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment."

Even so, Trump’s words will cause unease in Silicon Valley.

Some tech leaders acknowledge they are under increasing pressure on various fronts.

They have been buffeted by several controversies, from Russia’s apparent use of deceptive Facebook accounts during the 2016 presidential election campaign to the question of whether controversial users such as Alex Jones of Infowars should be banned from social media platforms.

The tech companies also make inviting targets for both major political parties, in different ways: Democrats are suspicious of the companies’ vast wealth and corporate power; Republicans fret that the broadly liberal ideological complexion of the tech community leaves the GOP, and conservatives more generally, vulnerable to bias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some Insiders at FB - are not happy

Dozens at Facebook Unite to Challenge Its ‘Intolerant’ Liberal Culture

Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, told Congress this year that he wanted the company to “be a platform for all ideas.”CreditCreditTom Brenner/The New York Times

SAN FRANCISCO — The post went up quietly on Facebook’s internal message board last week. Titled “We Have a Problem With Political Diversity,” it quickly took off inside the social network.

“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” Brian Amerige, a senior Facebook engineer, wrote in the post, which was obtained by The New York Times. “We claim to welcome all perspectives, but are quick to attack — often in mobs — anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology.”

Since the post went up, more than 100 Facebook employees have joined Mr. Amerige to form an online group called FB’ers for Political Diversity, according to two people who viewed the group’s page and who were not authorized to speak publicly. The aim of the initiative, according to Mr. Amerige’s memo, is to create a space for ideological diversity within the company.

The new group has upset other Facebook employees, who said its online posts were offensive to minorities. One engineer, who declined to be identified for fear of retaliation, said several people had lodged complaints with their managers about FB’ers for Political Diversity and were told that it had not broken any company rules.

> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/technology/inside-facebook-employees-political-bias.html

#UCK ZUCK!  he may have to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Corsi: "War has just been declared" ... on the Silicon Valley censorship

Starting sometime after 20minutes, Corsi speaks of the battle between Trump & Fake news

Jerome Corsi Live - Tues. Aug. 28, 2018, Current Events

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, drbubb said:

mSparks Lacks DISCERNMENT !!!!

Meantime, here on GEI, Sparks spread the Lies, even as I warned him about Cohen's lack of consistency in his stories = Zero Credibility

 

nah, he's a smart one with plenty of nous.  he knows what he's doing but i don't understand why he hangs round this place since there r no normies here 2 influence.... it's only u and me and a few zillion spooks and maybe a whole bundle of devil-worshipping, baby-raping & munching cannibals.  u'r wasting yr time paying him any attention.  Y don't u install an ignore facility so i won't even have to scroll past his propaganda?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
Report just out: “China hacked Hillary Clinton’s private Email Server.” Are they sure it wasn’t Russia (just kidding!)? What are the odds that the FBI and DOJ are right on top of this? Actually, a very big story. Much classified information!
6:16 PM - 28 Aug 2018

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HyperCrites - Hyper Hypocrites

VOX complains that the WH intern picture isn't diverse enough. Here are the 4 people who occupy the only 4 seats on their board of directors. I'm sensing a pattern here.

PkuuIgUHC4zwBrUl8q0G2VK_Y0h8W9dxeOqVvWIF

James Bankoff, Casey Wasserman, David Zilberman, Zachary Kaplan.
Four very nice Jewish gentlemen (I am sure).
Why do I suddenly think of Zuckerberg, and Eric Schmidt
... and wonder at those rumors that Bezos is secretly Jooish.
I should be thrilled that they are calling for Diversity, in everything but political thought, right?

Remember,

Diversity is code word for WHITE GENOCIDE

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting Ready to pounce?

Trump unblocks more Twitter users after court ruling

President Trump on Tuesday unblocked dozens of Twitter users, allowing them to see his account and posts, after a letter was sent to the Justice Department urging the president to comply with a court order ruling his feed to be a public forum.

Reuters reports that the unblocking of some users came at the request of The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which sent a request to the Justice Department earlier this month detailing the accounts, which are just some of the total number of accounts that had been blocked by the president.

At least 20 individuals on the list confirmed to Reuters that they were unblocked on Tuesday. The list reportedly includes authors and film producers who have publicly criticized the president.

Sauce for the goose... Google, Facebook, and Twitter clearly fit the definition of a public forum, so the courts should force them to stop deplatforming conservatives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

…Maga vs. Tech Titans for Future of USA

Trump Sets Sights on His Most Dangerous Enemy Yet

Stage Set for Epic Showdown with Masters of the Universe (SUCH AS IT IS)

Trump vs. Google

After criticizing social media platforms for mass-censoring conservatives and the alternative media earlier this month, President Trump has turned his attention to Google. Not a moment too soon — of all the politically biased tech giants, Google is by far the most dangerous.

Trump’s critical comments about Google referenced statistics from a report in PJ Media which found that a staggering 96 percent of search results for “Trump” return results from news sites that are hostile to the President. Breitbart News’ own investigation found the same result.

As Google search results are personalized, this wasn’t a strictly scientific study — that would require tests on hundreds, if not thousands of Google users. But the fact that a conservative columnist received search results that were 96 percent liberal should be deeply worrying. If that’s what a conservative with a (presumably) conservative search history sees, what kind of results are being sent to swing-voters?

The fact that it could be a problem of all search engines, not just Google, due to the way search algorithms detect “trustworthy” content is true, but Google holds a stranglehold on the search market. It’s closest english-language competitor, Bing, holds 7 percent of the market for searches according to NetMarketShare.

Another obvious problem with Google search is how its algorithm repeatedly surfaces information from Wikipedia at the top of search results. Wikipedia is an “online encyclopedia” that relies on a mass of anonymous, unaccountable editors to create its myriad of pages. The encyclopedia’s citation rules, which favor academic and establishment media sources while excluding sources like Breitbart News and the Daily Caller as “unreliable” inherently favor the left.

So too does its cabal of unaccountable left-wing editors, who are slowly but surely turning the purportedly non-partisan encyclopedia into a platform for anti-Trump propaganda. Wikipedia editors recently added Trump to a list of advocates of the “white genocide conspiracy theory” following his comments on the racially motivated murders of white farmers in South Africa. They previously included ICE detention centers on a Wikipedia list of “concentration camps.” The result of Google’s reliance on a far-left encyclopedia is that false information – fake news, you could say

. . . Google’s upper management has, in the past, been brazen about its political biases. Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google parent company Alphabet in 2016, set up a shadowy organization called “The Groundwork” aimed at harnessing the expertise of Silicon Valley to put Hillary Clinton in the White House. In a 2014 email leaked by WikiLeaks, Clinton campaign manager John Podesta also claimed that Schmidt wanted to be “head outside adviser” to the Clinton campaign.

It’s impossible to say for sure if Google is deliberately stacking its search results against Trump. And that’s the entire problem — the company is not currently required to be transparent about its algorithms, who’s in charge of them, and what their biases are. Given the vast power that this company has accumulated — the power to “organize the world’s information”, as the company’s own mission statement reads — how can this be allowed to continue?

/ 2 /

POTUS Claims Victory over Fake News CNN: Ratings ‘Suck’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

72 SECONDS @55true4u 16h16 hours ago
Make no mistake. CNN lies all of the time, 24 hours a day, relentlessly ...

72 SECONDS added,

CNN CommunicationsVerified account @CNNPR
Replying to @realDonaldTrump @carlbernstein
Make no mistake, Mr. President, CNN does not lie. We report the news. And we report when people in power tell lies. CNN stands by our reporting and our reporters. There may be many fools in this story but @carlbernstein is not one of them.
 

 

 

72 SECONDS @55true4u 5h5 hours ago
'Paid' Deep State actors in a coordinated effort to prevent the Shocking Truth from coming out. Enemy of the People indeed ...

72 SECONDS added,

Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
I just cannot state strongly enough how totally dishonest much of the Media is. Truth doesn’t matter to them, they only have their hatred & agenda. This includes fake books, which come out about me all the time, always anonymous sources, and are pure fiction. Enemy of the People!
 

 

 

Lisa Mei Crowley @LisaMei62 3h3 hours ago
1. Q linked to two WaPo articles re: how "unpopular" the QAnon movement & @realDonaldTrump are. I refuse to pay one penny for #FakeNews. The headlines are enough to tell me it's pure bullsh*t. Was able to grab quick screenshots before their subscription pay wall popped up.
Dl3GWeNUcAAJvag.jpg
 
Dl3GW3oU0AEyzVH.jpg
Dl3GXz8U4AAlHmp.jpg
 

 

 

Lisa Mei Crowley @LisaMei62 3h3 hours ago
2. Clowns tried to install another spy w/in NSA to try to tarnish their rep like Snowden did. They failed. Brace for round #3 of anti-Q MSM blitz. We already know a certain "MAGA" "journalist" intends to PROVE Q isn't legit. Those who are attacked the most are the BIGGEST threat.
Dl3HndIU4AAGJQE.jpg
 

 

 

 

Lisa Mei Crowley @LisaMei62 3h3 hours ago
Clowns are spooked as we get closer to midterms; they read the boards too...they KNOW their fate is already sealed. #RedWave
Dl3IVADUcAAGGUp.jpg
 

 

 

 

Lisa Mei Crowley @LisaMei62 3h3 hours ago
5. Funny, I just mentioned the fake HRC election polls before seeing this drop. It's all #FakeNews. Do NOT allow polls to make you complacent in November. We need EVERY SINGLE PATRIOT to get out and VOTE!
Dl3K5gsU8AAQfPA.jpg
 
Dl3K5-CUUAE_ghX.jpg
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/29/2018 at 2:08 AM, callmejoe said:

 

Joe ConchaVerified account @JoeConchaTV
Very difficult to see how CNN can continue to stand by its July 27 Michael Cohen/Trump Tower story given its own formerly-anonymous source is now openly admitting to lying about it on the network. Retraction seems to be the only recourse here:

Joe Concha added,

Steven PerlbergVerified account @perlberg
Lanny Davis has told BuzzFeed News that he was an anonymous source for CNN's Trump Tower bombshell, a story he now disputes. He also regrets lying about his involvement, on CNN's own air, in an interview with Anderson Cooper last week https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stevenperlberg/lanny-davis-cnn-trump-tower-story 
6:34 PM - 27 Aug 2018

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/35178/truth-refund-some-donors-cohen-truth-fund-want-james-barrett

'Truth REFUND'? Some Donors To Cohen 'Truth Fund' Want Money Back After His Lawyer Admits To False Claims

When Lanny Davis first announced that he'd created the "Michael Cohen Truth Fund" to help pay for some of the expenses of his embattled client's crusade to "tell the truth about Donald Trump," he initially inspired more groans than donations. But after a week, the GoFundMe page managed to amass over $165,000 amid Davis suggesting that his client had some damning info on Trump and Russian "collusion."

But after Davis admitted to making false claims to multiple outlets about what his client does or doesn't know about Trump and Russia, at least a few of Davis' donors are calling on him to offer a refund.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Anonymous  08/30/18 (Thu) 17:24:21882973 (4)  No.2798468>>2798484 >>2798937

File (hide): db2e1e4503ec237⋯.jpeg (142.28 KB, 1199x808, 1199:808, 5E5F39D5-EFAB-4099-BA33-D….jpeg) (h)(u)

db2e1e4503ec237482b8c071c255d84b1cfe7351

File (hide): 7995610ee131d48⋯.jpeg (138.15 KB, 1241x1019, 1241:1019, 1E1DC133-6710-4C10-8591-A….jpeg)(h) (u)

7995610ee131d48b6d4b87dd415e4fb200edc1fa

File (hide): 88e3df220f20da0⋯.png (837.79 KB, 1005x600, 67:40, 01E62ACC-9F67-45C7-9D9D-54….png) (h) (u)

88e3df220f20da0f4e6af49b75d294e7841f8da4

File (hide): 9c497b9205e115f⋯.jpeg (104.35 KB, 745x723, 745:723, 99DA074D-EB03-4A9D-8DC4-B….jpeg) (h)(u)

9c497b9205e115ff5c05caff763909c2dd761c7d

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×