Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Toxic Femininity = Lack of Logic & Accountability

Recommended Posts

Nutty hysterical Females want to blame Trump for Everything

Amy Poehler Blames Trump for Her Problems, Says It’s ‘Hard To Not Have a Full-On Panic Attack Every Day’

“Parks and Recreation” actress Amy Poehler is the latest victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome, as she asserts that President Donald Trump is responsible for her problems.
The 47-year-old actress, who played the liberal “Leslie Knope” character, apparently struggles to resist having a “full-on panic attack” daily because of Trump, according to an interview with Poehler published Wednesday in The Hollywood Reporter.
“It’s really hard to not have a full-on panic attack every day. It’s why people are self-medicating,” Poehler claimed.
Poehler should speak for herself, given that millions of Americans support Trump and his agenda. If that wasn’t the case, he wouldn’t have won the 2016 election.
It’s a stretch to say Trump is the reason why “people are self-medicated,” but it’s not surprising that an out-of-touch Hollywood liberal like Poehler would resort to alcohol to deal with her Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Hollywood liberals seem to be especially susceptible to unhinged anti-Trump activity, but their behavior certainly isn’t representative of everyday Americans.
To put it bluntly, Poehler has serious problems if Trump’s presidency actually gives her daily panic attacks. But Poehler believes her anti-Trump frenzy is normal for women: She said they are “righteously furious” about the Trump administration.
“Women have been rightly and righteously furious about this administration and have been working together and bonding together just in an attempt to make sense of all of it,” Poehler said.
“Every woman I know has a text chain, every morning we just say, ‘Can you believe this? Can we break this down together so I don’t lose my mind? Anybody out there?’ Because it’s really crazy-making.”
Honestly.  She needs to get a grip. Or maybe take her insanity to another country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three Toxic females, will not help Women's cause

It was just a few months ago that the most-anticipated Congressional class in U.S. history was sworn into office.

Lauded as the largest class of women ever elected to Congress – and also the most diverse – the expectations were high for the world to witness women’s leadership in action.

However, this class of women has done enough damage in their first 100 days to make Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Abigail Adams turn over in their graves.

Not since Congress members spat tobacco juice on one another and caned a fellow member on the Senate floor have we seen behavior so unbefitting members of Congress. (At least back in their day, they were fighting for a noble cause: the abolition of slavery.)

. . .

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, has ushered in the idea of converting America into a socialist country. This should be surprising, especially in the U.S., given the blood and treasure spent to resist the ideology that has contributed to the deaths of 100 million people around the globe since its inception – including women and children.

Under Leninist/Communist regimes alone, 11 million people died from famine and political arrests, and another 3 million died from labor camps and Gulags. The list of deaths of our most vulnerable goes on and on in a Communist/Socialist ideology that the Wall Street Journal called “…the greatest catastrophe in human history.”

As women, we must protect women and children from murderous Socialist regimes. This seems the most basic of all rules.

. . .

In true sisterhood we should seek not to be counted for our sheer numbers in a body of government; rather, we should expect to earn our place in leadership and continue to earn our place through noble ideas, hard work, and patriotism.

This hurts the credibility of all women – regardless of party – who seek to run for office in the future.

In a letter to her husband President John Adams while he was in Philadelphia in 1776, women’s suffrage champion Abigail Adams wrote, “Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors.”

It is clear that voters in the last election cycle were indeed more favorable to women than their ancestors.

Thus far, the results are disappointing.

In careening their own party off the far-left cliff of reason, the newly-sworn class of female Democratic Congress members have exhibited a lack of respect for the institutions that have made America great. Through their lack of decorum, lack of message discipline and their messy, emotional name-calling the women’s class has demonstrated that they are just as hysterical and out of control as their detractors suggested they might be. This hurts the credibility of all women – regardless of party – who seek to run for office in the future.

===

Yup. You gotta question the wisdom in letting such CHILDREN vote, let alone, running for office.

Some Women vote for women, without expecting them to EARN their positions of power

AOC has earned the right to be forced to get more education, not to stay in Congress

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

REVENGE OF THE DWORKS

Rather than losing weight, Fatties want to use LAW to force you to like them

Why Is Fat a Feminist Issue?

(Because it requires will-power, something they lack)

AP_1307240976.sized-770x415xb.jpg

In a speech on the topic of “radical fat liberation” jointly sponsored by the Women and Gender Studies Department and the Center for Equity and Inclusion (what else?) at St. Olaf College in Minnesota, the prodigiously overweight Sonalee Rashatwar, a self-proclaimed Fat Sex Therapist, compared fitness trainers to Nazis, defined child dieting as sexual assault, attributed the Christchurch shooting to ‘thin” white supremacism, and condemned science as “fataphobic” for “promoting the idea that certain bodies are fit, able and desirable.” She wonders, rhetorically, “is it my fatness that causes my high blood pressure, or is it my experience of weight stigma?” She goes on to blame the Reagan administration for having refused to provide “social supports that also help me to subsidize my food costs.” Believe it! We have entirely transcended the realm of reason, sanity and common sense, and tossed the concept of personal responsibility into the cultural dumpster.

Rashatwar, of course, is not alone in pursuing her redemptive mission. Fat is big in the feminist Weltanschauung. Virgie Tovar’s influential You Have the Right to Remain Fat is a case in point, resting on a subtle distinction between fat positivity and fat activism. Lindy West, whose book Shrill is a feature on Hulu, tells us she had “always been a great big person,” but uses her natural condition as a kind of license for voluntary accumulation. If we are to be honest, we would have to say that we are witnessing a grotesquerie in progress—which is, again to be honest, what feminism has become.

. . .According to Gillian Brown in a recent blog post "Why is Fat a Feminist Issue?" from which I take my title, “Fat women are an embodiment of exactly what patriarchal society does not want women to be: visible.” Heft, she implies, is female revenge against a tyrannical masculinity that wishes to erase women from the public square, to obliterate them from view. Her thesis is so counterintuitive as to be visibly preposterous. Men have been promoting the presence of women in all the spheres of public, professional and institutional life for generations, often to their own material disadvantage. Men obviously enjoy looking at women, the more visible the better. Many husbands are quite delighted with their beautiful wives—I know I am—and happy for all the world to look upon them with appreciation. Men in non-repressive cultures are not prone to lock up their women, barricade them in some version of Bluebeard’s Castle or drape them in pup tents.

Brown’s argument becomes even more ridiculous when one recalls that feminists also object to the indigestible horror of catcalling and the malevolent prevalence of the “male gaze,” which would be impossible if women were rendered invisible. You can’t have it both ways but that never stopped a feminist.

. . . A major text on the subject is the edited volume Feminist Perspectives on Building a Better Psychological Science of Gender, in which a chapter by Rachel Calogero, Tracy Tylka and Janell Mensinger dwells on “weight stigma,” “weightist assumptions” and “thin privilege.” There are no negative consequences in being overweight, these self-appointed experts inform us; besides, adiposity is not within an individual’s power to control. Medical discourses on the hazards of weight only increase weight stigma and should be dismissed out of hand. Bias against fat women constitutes a social justice and human rights issue, they conclude, lobbying for “formal legislation to protect against weight stigma and discrimination,” including the assessments of medical science. If you don’t like something, or if it goes counter to your belief system, ban it. Such is the feminist position.

> https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/why-is-fat-a-feminist-issue/

===

Utter nonsense.  Female Revenge? (when they are not handed everything they want without effort on their part?)

Let's dial UP the ridicule for these fat whining slobs... & their bankrupt, selfish ideas

Jeremy%20Lybarger%20Andrea%20Dworkin.jpg

Andrea Dworkin. many bad idea came from this person. Take a good look at her

Similar to...

"Dork" means a socially awkward person. Example: My son is upset because some kids at school called him a dork.

The W adds... FAT & FEMALE

 

A "DWORK" might be a very good name for women who look and think like her

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pushback From Whorely-Wood? Amazing Streep statement

The real problem now is over emotionalism (toxic femininity), not Logic, Reason, Accountability & Strength

(Listen to AOC, and you will see Toxic femininity in action)

meryl-streep-devil-wears-prada-glasses-6


STREEP: TERM 'TOXIC MASCULINITY' HARMFUL TO BOYS...

'Women Can Be F*cking Toxic Too'... (right on, Meryl!)

 

Actress Meryl Streep criticized the use of the term “toxic masculinity,” arguing that toxicity is a trait that afflicts both sexes as women can be “pretty fucking toxic too.”

Appearing on a cast panel ahead of the season two premiere of Big Little Lies, Streep made the comments in response to a male audience member who said he enjoyed the primarily female-targeted show.

“Sometimes, I think we’re hurt,” Streep said. “We hurt our boys by calling something toxic masculinity. I do. And I don’t find [that] putting those two words together … because women can be pretty fucking toxic.”

“It’s toxic people. We have our good angles and we have our bad ones. I think the labels are less helpful than what we’re trying to get to, which is communication, direct, between human beings,” she continued. “We’re all on the boat together. We’ve got to make it work.”

According to The Good Men Project, an organization that seeks to start “conversations about the changing roles of men in the 21st century,” toxic masculinity is a “narrow and repressive description of manhood, designating manhood as defined by violence, sex, status, and aggression.”

“It’s the cultural ideal of manliness, where strength is everything while emotions are a weakness; where sex and brutality are yardsticks by which men are measured, while supposedly ‘feminine’ traits — which can range from emotional vulnerability to simply not being hypersexual — are the means by which your status as ‘man’ can be taken away,” the group said.

Streep’s comments may come as a disappointment to her progressive fan base, who she regularly plays to in her vociferous criticism of President Donald Trump and conservative leaders. However, she has also previously dodged the question of being a feminist, instead choosing to describe herself as a “humanist.”

Just this week, fellow actress Gwyneth Paltrow launched a new podcast aimed at helping men fight the scourage of “toxic masculinity,” as part of a new range of products from her lifestyle brand Goop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Celebrating witches ... as the first (& Last?) feminists

Witches were first feminists, says Paris haute couture star

ca891a4cdd230a309e73d711b99c00e0711f301e

Paris (AFP) - French designer Julien Fournie hailed witches as proto-feminist trailblazers who sent shivers through the patriarchy as he staged his Paris haute couture show in a church on Tuesday.

The flamboyant couturier who believes that women should learn to love their curves, and knows how to make the best of them, sent out a run of models of all ages and shapes in corsets, killer heels and hip-hugging skirts.

Calling his collection "First Spell", he said he took his inspiration from witches who "knew how to control their destiny".

Women "can be beautiful at any age", he told AFP.

"Men have always wanted to strangle women's destiny and emancipation. We can no longer accept that," he added, railing against the recent passing of restrictive abortion laws by some states in the US.

"I have always found witches stimulating," Fournie said.

"Haute couture and magic share a taste for accumulated experience and tricks of the trade. Official education often does not appreciate this kind of knowledge," said the designer, who studied anatomy and trained as a doctor before finding his true passion in fashion.

- Gothic noir -

Fournie transformed a Protestant church in a chic street in central Paris into a catwalk, with fashionistas huddled on wooden pews.

They watched a mix of striking silhouettes and gothic noir, padded-shouldered military jackets paraded alongside billowing Edwardian skirts, with Fournie encouraging his models to flounce, twirl and show their personalities to the cameras.

> https://news.yahoo.com/witches-were-first-feminists-says-paris-haute-couture-210004451.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Mr Reagan" tells it like it is

Ugly women pushed feminism, he says near the end

The most BRUTAL Truth about our Culture with Mr. Reagan

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would ANY man do this?

Woman Reportedly Leaves $5,000 Tip on Boyfriend’s Credit Card Because She was Mad at Him

It turns out, a woman who gave a waitress a $5,000 tip wasn’t being as generous as it seemed.

The massive tip was apparently part of a woman’s plan to get back at her boyfriend, who she was seemingly very angry with. She reportedly used her boyfriend’s credit card without his knowledge.

Serina Wolfe was arrested and charged with grand theft.

Serina Wolfe was arrested and charged with grand theft. (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office)

Serina Wolfe was arrested and charged with grand theft, Fox 2 Now reports. She made headlines after she left the gigantic tip to a waitress at Clear Sky Café in Clearwater, Fla. Unfortunately, it’s now unclear if the server will get to keep the money.

Wolfe was reportedly angry that her boyfriend wouldn’t let her use his credit card to purchase a plane ticket so she could go home to New York. He initially put a hold on the card, but once he lifted it, she used it to leave the newsworthy tip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/16/2019 at 7:27 PM, drbubb said:

The Liestream media & the advertisers there have got it wrong ... again

What Pisses Me Off About "We Believe: The Best Men Can Be | Gillette (Short Film)

800.jpeg
This image from Gillette's Twitter account shows a Gillette advertisement. The ad for men invoking the #MeToo movement is sparking online backlash, with some saying it talks down to men and calling for a boycott. Gillette says it doesn’t mind sparking a discussion, and since it debuted Monday, Jan. 14, 2019, the online-only ad has garnered millions of views on YouTube, a level of buzz and chatter that any brand would covet. (Gillette via AP)

NEW YORK (AP) — A Gillette ad for men invoking the #MeToo movement is sparking intense online backlash, with accusations that it talks down to men and groups calling for a boycott. But Gillette says it doesn’t mind sparking a discussion...

Get Woke, Go Broke:

Procter & Gamble Loses $5 Billion Dollars Following ‘Woke’ Anti-Man Gillette Ad Campaign

Procter & Gamble has reported a net loss of $5.24 billion, prompting speculation as to whether a boycott of the company’s Gillette shaving products after a divisive ‘woke’ ad campaign hit the company’s bottom line.

The ad, entitled ‘We Believe’, was released in January. It asked men to “shave their toxic masculinity,” while blaming an entire gender for the actions of a small percentage of sexual abusers, rapists and perverts.

The commercial alternated between echoing glib feminist talking points and bashing men, while also featuring a clip from left-wing news outlet The Young Turks.

The ad was so despised, it went on to become one of the most hated ads in Internet history.

It has now been revealed that Procter & Gamble took an $8 billion writedown on its Gillette shaving business, contributing to “a net loss of about $5.24 billion, or $2.12 per share, for the quarter ended June 30.”

P&G claims the writedown is “due primarily to foreign exchange fluctuations, increased competition and a contracting market for blades and razors as consumers in developed markets shave less frequently.”

But how much of that “increased competition,” from the likes of Harry’s and Dollar Shave Club, was thanks to customers abandoning Gillette after their man-bashing commercial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS makes sense - Reject the trash poisonous ideas of Toxic Femininity

DON’T Let Women Tell You How to be a Man!

==

Bossy Wife? Call Suzanne Venker!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TOXIC FEMININITY Exposed - How rarely we hear about this !

Feminism encourages predator behavior by so-called "Alpha Males"

The Deep Nastiness of the "Incel" Slur - and the Damage Caused by "Alpha Males"

/ 2 /

How many "fathers" - are raising the offspring of "Alpha Males"?

MUST LISTEN! "My Husband's Son is NOT HIS!" Freedomain Call In

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PC Feminism trumps Equal opportunity in the Land of Oz

EQUALITY: Australian University Lowers Standards For Women Looking To Enter Engineering Degrees

Equality? No thanks. Women at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) will be able to enter engineering and construction degrees with a lower score on an admissions test than their male counterparts
 
The Sydney Morning Herald reported that UTS will allow women to enter engineering and construction degrees with a lower score on the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR) than male students. Women can score 10 points lower than men and still be admitted into the degree programs.
As the Herald reported, many universities in the country “allocate adjustment points based on disadvantage or illness,” but UTS appears to be the first one to make the adjustment based on gender. As one can guess, the move to lower the entry bar for women is being done in an effort to get more women into engineering.
Dr. Arti Agarwal, director of women in engineering and IT at UTS, told the Herald that admitting women into the programs — even with lower entrance scores — would make the world a better place.
“Lots of research has shown that teams are more productive when they are gender balanced. They come up with better ideas and better solutions," she told the outlet. No such research was cited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UNAFRAID to Speak Truth... to Women & and their "male bitches"

"We have to be willing to STAND UP to this stuff... Sometimes, you need to be a little cruel"

Feminism is The Cause of ALL The Problems in America (My Speech at the ICMI)
"RULES apply only to Oppressor groups."
The reality is: There are No Oppressors. The victims are not real victims. They are LOSERS, who failed in various ways. And they want to blame their lack of success on other people... whom they call oppressors. But they are not oppressed. They are people lacking in something: Discipline, good work habits, understanding of reality, freedom from addiction... are some of the missing things that cause Losers to fail to succeed. Sometimes they fail simply because they lack the will to try, because they are wedded to their victim narratives. Isn't it time we started speaking the TRUTH about this?
 2/
NO DIVORCES in Chris's family...except one. Interesting. Same thing in my family.
The men are strong, fair & reliable. And the women are not whiny. This combination works! Zero Tolerance of Feminist garbage. But treat women with respect and honor them for all the good things they do !
 
We need more women - wives, mothers, aunts, grandmothers - at home again and it will create millions of happier, healthier, less stressed, less depressed and anxious people. That's my opinion. AND, I'M A WOMAN!!!
 
Feminists don't want equality, they just want all the good things about being a man without having to work for it.
 
It's NOT " Toxic Masculinity " that's the problem.....it's Toxic FEMINISTS...I say FEMINISTS not Femininity ...because there is virtually NOTHING feminine about Toxic Feminists .....
=====
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some powerful comments here... about Toxic Femininity

TF is linked to the rise of government, since women use government as the mechanism to extract resources from Men

How To Be a Modern Man! Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain in Conversation

32 minutes in: The Battle between two cultures
Families with Fathers + Discipline = Strong culture of responsible individuals
Single Mothers + “spray & pray” + high taxes, totalist government = Socialism w/o Freedom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Candace Owens and her guests get SO MUCH RIGHT here

Best of The Candace Owens Show

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TOXIC Femininity:  GOVERNMENT is THE Answer

The instrument through which they can steal more resources and channel them to those who did not earn them (women!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feminine Bad Behavior is being Noticed & Understood for what it is

How Feminist Social Justice Warriors are Killing Men

 

I have said time and time again, that feminism is akin to cancer on the world. Some will undoubtedly question my views on feminism; I agree that first wave, and even to a point second wave feminism did good things for woman and equality. The right to vote, wear clothes we feel comfortable in, and the ability to work outside the home to name a few.

As third wave feminism desperately needs to embrace a cause in order to stay both relevant and valid in the eyes of society, femimists have doubled down on men in general. They denounce “the patriarchy,” the imaginary world that has men running everything and secretly holding women back from certain careers and advancement in the workplace.  They even claim an imaginary wage gap is a problem.  However, none of this exists in reality.

Women and men think differently.  I know this may be a shock to some, but our brains do in fact work differently.  Women are less likely to be attracted to careers that men are typically drawn to. Engineering, math, science and work in the trades are not something many women seek out to find careers in.  Just as men are typically not administrative office support, human resources specialists and even teachers very often.  This being said, nobody is holding women back from certain careers; they are choosing not to pursue those careers upon entering college and then the workforce.

Women also tend to take more time off than their male counterparts in the workplace. Maternity leave and personal time to care for children at home make up the majority of work absenteeism by women. Yet feminists insist that there is a gender pay gap; never once considering that men work longer hours, and are not taking as much time off.

I have never experienced this “patriarchy” that purportedly oppresses women in the workplace. There may be times when disagreements over ideas happened; however in any functioning place of work where critical thinking takes place, there will be alternate views and concepts. This is not oppression. I have even had male colleagues “go to bat for me” in the workplace, stating to our supervisors that I was the correct person to work on certain projects.

So why exactly are feminists of the modern era so angry with men? We live in a world where all the real problems and issues are taken care of, so virtue signaling and social justice has emerged to create issues to be upset over. Imagine waking up each day and looking for things to get riled up over and then deciding men are the root cause of all evil? Imagine turning men’s issues into a way for women to further play victim? Such nonsense has already occurred in the many media outlets, such as this article from Harpers Bazaar “Men Have No Friends and Women Bear the Burden.” Isolated men are a woman’s burden? This incessant pandering to females as the ultimate victims in an oppressive society truly needs to be culled.

216081_5_.jpg

Photo credit: Chase Carter

Men are feeling hopeless and unwanted. They are losing the ability to find purpose in life since they are repetitively enlightened by the media about how bad they are for merely existing. If you cannot find a purpose in life, what is the point in living simply to exist? This is a real problem men are facing today and it is women who caused it.

We began to see how this became a problem with the #MeToo movement. What started out as good intentions to shed light on sexual assault and harassment in and around Hollywood, and then into the common workplace, rapidly turned on its own head. When all it took was a person’s word that something happened with no actual proof, this movement started targeting men. “Believe all women” was a battle cry, and yet there is evidence that some women were lying to gain fame and payouts in the end, vilifying men and ruining careers in the blink of an eye.

More and more women are embracing their sexuality and having casual sex with random partners. It has been found that some of the allegations levied against men for sex crimes, were in fact women who later regretted their own decisions. The new ability to withdraw consent at any time is a dangerously slippery slope. When women make poor judgement calls and regret having sex with a man, they can accuse him of rape because they feel like it.

Social Justice Warriors who are screaming the loudest at every possible turn, have decided that all men are a problem. You know these women; they constantly talk about how horrible men are, and how the patriarchy is holding them back.  They set out to destroy men in general.  All men are predators who are in need of being “cancelled” to these SJWs.  This leads to rabid attacks on men all over social media and out in the streets in protest, as well.

Imagine, if you will, being a young man, and all you hear is how terrible, atrocious, predatory, and downright evil men are. Does this type of nonstop barrage of demeaning language make for healthy self-esteem, or mental health? No.  An entire group of human beings is being abused and mentally battered every day, and we wonder why male suicide is on the rise?

With Mental Health Awareness in mind, it is important for SJW’s and especially 3rd wave feminists to understand that they are literally killing men. The suicide rate among males is nearly four times higher (22.4 per 100,000 in 2017) than among females (6.1 per 100,000 in 2017).According to the National Institute of Mental Health.

How about we “cancel” blame shifting for poor decisions, regrets, and making yourself feel superior by demonizing another? That would certainly be a nice change of pace. Maybe the crushing depression of feeling worthless in society will lift and some much-needed civility will return.

If you are in crisis, call the toll-free National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255), available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The service is available to anyone. All calls are confidential. http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org

H.K. Rivera is an independent political and philosophical writer

I have said time and time again, that feminism is akin to cancer on the world. Some will undoubtedly question my views on feminism; I agree that first wave, and even to a point second wave feminism did good things for woman and equality. The right to vote, wear clothes we feel comfortable in, and the ability to work outside the home to name a few.

As third wave feminism desperately needs to embrace a cause in order to stay both relevant and valid in the eyes of society, femimists have doubled down on men in general. They denounce “the patriarchy,” the imaginary world that has men running everything and secretly holding women back from certain careers and advancement in the workplace.  They even claim an imaginary wage gap is a problem.  However, none of this exists in reality.

Women and men think differently.  I know this may be a shock to some, but our brains do in fact work differently.  Women are less likely to be attracted to careers that men are typically drawn to. Engineering, math, science and work in the trades are not something many women seek out to find careers in.  Just as men are typically not administrative office support, human resources specialists and even teachers very often.  This being said, nobody is holding women back from certain careers; they are choosing not to pursue those careers upon entering college and then the workforce.

Women also tend to take more time off than their male counterparts in the workplace. Maternity leave and personal time to care for children at home make up the majority of work absenteeism by women. Yet feminists insist that there is a gender pay gap; never once considering that men work longer hours, and are not taking as much time off.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/how_feminist_social_justice_warriors_are_killing_men.html#ixzz5zwmp34hq
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FAREWELL... to decent women

thanks feminism... and leftism

Sugar Baby Feminism!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, hector said:

It's best to let women screw up so they will learn their lessons. No need to hand hold or coddle.

Hmm

But so long as they blame everything wrong on the opposite sex, how will they learn?

And the costs to our society of their multiple screw-ups & enthusiasms for things that are just plan wrong, is rising

Douglas Murray did not blame Identity politics related problems on Feminism, but he comes close to doing that

Douglas Murray on gender, race and identity | Liddle's Got Issues

"there's a set of issues we are not allowed to talk about... even think about"

"these are the things than cancel people so easily"

THE ISSUES are used as a battering ram... to gain power

Liddle: "It annoys all the right people" > (he did not say it, but Those on the Left)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Male authority will not work as it has been rejected. It is time for economic reality to set in and it will hurt both men and women. But if men are smart it will hurt them far less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"... if men are smart it will hurt them far less. "

White Men are usually most harmed by the "Diversity" & "Affirmative" initiatives in big corporations.

The only place to hide (from the multiple stupidities) may be to be their own bosses in small owner-controlled enterprizes

BECOME AN ENTREPRENEUR and avoid the Madness??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Women making More, but they are less happy

University Study Proves Women Are Gold Diggers | Redonkulas.com

Women: Men make more than women, it's not fair! Also women: Men don't make enough money for women to marry, it's not fair!
This is totally a womans problem. Men are doing just fine.
 
Wait, why cant you marry a guy with low or normal income? Cause you wont get cash and prizes when you leave? Wooooe is you
 
PAIN IN THE Axx?
Black women celebrate being loud and brash

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STUDY on MARRIAGE - seems like women only want to marry UP

when not so easy, Marriage rates drop

Previous studies had attempted to answer why marriage rates are on the decline, but most focused solely on gender ratio discrepancies as opposed to looking into the specific socioeconomic characteristics that make a particular man and woman a good match.

First, the study’s authors examined data collected on recent marriages between 2007-2012 and 2013-2017, gathered as part of the American Community Survey’s cumulative 5-year marriage statistics. That data was used to estimate the financial and sociodemographic characteristics of unmarried women’s potential husbands by creating economic profiles that resembled real husbands who had married comparable women. These potential husband estimates were then compared to actual population data on unmarried men across national, state, and local locations.

Researchers found that these estimated potential “dream” husbands had an average income about 58% higher than the actual unmarried men currently available to unmarried women. These synthetic husbands were also 30% more likely to be employed than real single men and 19% more likely to have a college degree.

> more: https://www.studyfinds.org/why-are-marriage-rates-down-study-blames-lack-of-economically-attractive-men/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×