Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Can anyone explain Hillary's appeal?

Recommended Posts

Thinking people detest TSBFH and want Trump, Bernie, or a 3rd Party

 

Here's an example:

 

Bernie supporter:

Democracy Spring Hates Hillary

 

Trump supporters:

Navy Vet Speaks Veritas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bernie supporter:

Democracy Spring Hates Hillary

IMO this guy pretty much sums up the "average", intelligent, left wing feeling on the election. Although I've never rated Bernies chances (almost impossible chance of HRC in prison about the only thing that may increase them now).

Trouble is, American politics has no time for average, intelligent left wing (socialist) voters. Too many people are easily bribed with trinkets and brainwashed by the MSM, and forget too easily how people have behaved in the past.

->The more you research, the more crazy you sound to ignorant people.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h7Cxz_vV9E

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Susan Sarandon Crucified For Making Sense On Hillary Clinton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS, from one of the Draft-Dodger's conquests:

 

Hillary Clinton is a Lesbian Admits Former Miss Arkansas Sally Miller

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Found !... someone who actually supports Hillary ... at 7 minutes in

 

She's "a Union worker"... but does seems angry, and does not want to talk to Infowars

 

Feminist Triggered By Hillary For Prison Decal

 

(Warning ! If you live in America, you might have people like this "teaching" your children)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/04/13/president-killary-paul-craig-roberts/

 

Hillary Clinton is a bought-and-paid-for representative of the big banks, the military-security complex, and the Israel Lobby. She will represent these interests, not those of the American people or America’s European allies.

The Clintons’ purchase by interest groups is public knowledge. For example, CNN reports that between February 2001 and May 2015 Bill and Hillary Clinton were paid $153 million in speaking fees for 729 speeches, an average price of $210,000.

As it became evident that Hillary Clinton would emerge as the likely Democratic presidential candidate, she was paid more. Deutsche Bank paid her $485,000 for one speech, and Goldman Sachs paid her $675,000 for three speeches. Bank of American Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Fidelity Investments each paid $225,000. https://theintercept.com/2016/01/08/hillary-clinton-earned-more-from-12-speeches-to-big-banks-than-most-americans-earn-in-their-lifetime/

Despite Hillary’s blatent willingness to be bribed in public, her opponent, Bernie Sanders, has not succeeded in making an issue of Hillary’s shamelessness. Both of the main establishment newspapers, the Washington Post and the New York Times have come to Hillary’s defense.

. . .

Hillary is a war-monger. She pushed the Obama regime into the destruction of a stable and largely cooperative government in Libya where the “Arab Spring” was a CIA-backed group of jihadists who were used to dislodge China from its oil investments in eastern Libya. She urged her husband to bomb Yugoslavia. She pushed for “regime change” in Syria. She oversaw the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Honduras. She brought neoconservative Victoria Nuland, who arranged the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Ukraine, into the State Department. Hillary has called President Vladimir Putin of Russia the “new Hitler.” Hillary as president guarantees war and more war. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/02/hillary-clintons-six-foreign-policy-catastrophes.html

. . .

According to the International Business Times, “Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments had given millions to the Clinton Foundation.” http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

 

> continues: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/04/13/president-killary-paul-craig-roberts/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"

Despite Hillary’s blatent willingness to be bribed in public, her opponent, Bernie Sanders, has not succeeded in making an issue of Hillary’s shamelessness. Both of the main establishment newspapers, the Washington Post and the New York Times have come to Hillary’s defense"

 

Sure.

There are all of one piece:

The-satanic-bitch-from-Hell, the Zio media, and her Zionist donors.

In short, THEY are the enemy (of the people of America)

 

Even though it is obvious to those who are awake, they may succeed anyway in installing Mrs Clinton as President to reign in their (brief?) global NWO.

If she wins, she may well turn out to be the anti-Christ. Hiow very fitting in our day and age to have a satanic witch President, who is also the anti-Christ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's what I told a friend the other day, nobody likes Hillary, they just like her positions on the issues.

 

Yeah. she unlikable.

 

Does she really have "positions" - or just talking points which shift and change according to her audience?

 

HRC is all about identity politics ("vote for me, because I am a woman" but don't ask how I treated the victims of my rapist president)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Killary may be headed for the sh/tter is today's NY State primary

 

Reuters - ‎41 minutes ago‎
NEW YORK U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders accused front-runner Hillary Clinton of apparent campaign finance violations on Monday, ratcheting up the rhetoric against his rival one day before New York state's crucial primary elections.
If Bernie can defeat her in her so-called "home state" he may still have a real chance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRUTH JIHAD: Ellen Brown says Hillary’s emails reveal the real reason why Qaddafi was murdered

.

By Kevin Barrett on April 18, 2016.

Was Qaddafi taken out to protect the Rothschild currency monopoly?…

 

Remember this?:

 

We came, we saw, we died - Killary at her "finest" and most unguarded

 

 

Does anyone think it is a worthy thing to put a monster like this in the white house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary wants to "correct" everyone.

Her agenda is war, oppression, (and satanism?)... and she has plenty of financial backing from rich Zionists

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary wants to "correct" everyone.

Her agenda is war, oppression, (and satanism?)... and she has plenty of financial backing from rich Zionists

With you up to the "rich Zionists" point.

https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00000019&cycle=Career

 

EMILY's List $907,510 $898,590 $8,920

Citigroup Inc $891,501 $883,501 $8,000

DLA Piper $852,873 $825,873 $27,000

Goldman Sachs $831,523 $821,523 $10,000

JPMorgan Chase & Co $801,380 $798,380 $3,000

Morgan Stanley $765,242 $760,242 $5,000

University of California $686,709 $686,709 $0

Time Warner $603,170 $578,170 $25,000

Skadden, Arps et al $562,182 $557,682 $4,500

Corning Inc $492,750 $474,750 $18,000

Kirkland & Ellis $491,066 $474,066 $17,000

Paul, Weiss et al $430,919 $430,919 $0

Greenberg Traurig LLP $422,195 $414,095 $8,100

Akin, Gump et al $405,998 $402,498 $3,500

Sullivan & Cromwell $395,807 $395,807 $0

National Amusements Inc $386,698 $383,698 $3,000

Harvard University $384,769 $384,769 $0

Ernst & Young $377,082 $357,082 $20,000

21st Century Fox $373,482 $373,482 $0

Lehman Brothers $362,853 $359,853 $3,000

This table lists the top donors to this candidate in 1999-2016

 

 

Zionism really doesn't extend outside of Israel.

 

These guys are the social justice warriors. Slave owners via finance. Mining families. And all the rest of the old world order crew whose perceptions of real peoples lives doesn't extend past the human resources department.

 

zionism is a vanishingly insignificant fraction of those evils.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea that Harvard University gives money to the HRC campaign, simply appalls me

(they wont ever get another penny from me... ever)

 

ABBY EXPLAINS the stark Reality of Hillary and her campaign

.

Empire Files: Abby Martin Exposes What Hillary Clinton Really Represents

 

I have seen HRC as:

A satanic and evil, Illuminati-thrilling bitch from Hell. Abby backs this up

 

"Born to wealthy textile wholesaler...
She has two brothers: a failed businessman, the other a failed politician,
both have a history of public scandals
Hilalry was the president of the young Republicans club at university"


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea that Harvard University gives money to the HRC campaign, simply appalls me

(they wont ever get another penny from me... ever)

 

ABBY EXPLAINS the stark Reality of Hillary and her campaign

.

Empire Files: Abby Martin Exposes What Hillary Clinton Really Represents

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV_PLCC6jeI

 

I have seen HRC as:

A satanic and evil, Illuminati-thrilling bitch from Hell. Abby backs this up

 

"Born to wealthy textile wholesaler...

She has two brothers: a failed businessman, the other a failed politician,

both have a history of public scandals

Hilalry was the president of the young Republicans club at university"

 

 

yeah. that.

 

doesn't it just make you feel warm and fuzzy inside....

 

like acid reflux.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s one thing I don’t understand about the 2016 presidential race:

 

Why is the media so determinately anti-Bernie Sanders?

The Vermont senator is the most unexpected, most interesting, most surprising story of the Democratic primary. You’d think the media would love him.

Instead, it’s been just the opposite.

Most political commentators never took him seriously, and they still don’t. From the beginning, they dismissed him as some old crank who didn’t have a chance and was, at best, a “message candidate.” Then, once he defied the odds and starting rolling up delegates, they insisted it still didn’t mean anything because the “math” was irrevocably against him.

Even last week in New York, when Hillary Clinton finally got back in the winning column after losing eight out of nine previous primaries and caucuses to Sanders, the dominant media theme was: Why’s Bernie still in this race? Or: What does Bernie really want?

==

> http://thehill.com/opinion/bill-press/277559-bill-press-bernie-sanders-wants-3-things

 

(A good question: "Why is the media so determinately anti-Bernie Sanders?"):

 

For me, the answer is simple:

They failed to take Bernie seriously because they are controlled by the same Satanic Zionists, who support the satanic and illuminati-thrilling bitch from Hell. her satanic majesty, Hitlery

(why hold back now?, it now looks like the Democratic party has ruined itselve by choosing her)

 

BERNIE's THREE THINGS

 

What does Bernie want? Three things.

First, he may not have started out with this dream, but today he clearly wants to win — both the nomination and the White House

.

Sanders’s second goal is to shape the agenda for 2016, to make sure that progressive issues like jobs, the minimum wage, climate change, criminal justice reform and cracking down on Wall Street remain front and center — not just in the primary, but through the general election. That will also mean hammering out a strong, progressive party platform at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

.

His third goal is to bring about “political revolution” by shaking up and radically reforming the Democratic Party. Like the Republican Party, Sanders believes the Democratic Party has become too beholden to Wall Street, lobbyists, big-dollar contributors and special interest money and must get back to its historic role as the party of the people and working-class Americans.

.

Sanders might not achieve his first goal, but he’s well on his way to achieving his second and third goals.

. . .

 

More importantly (to me):

Bernie is against the TPP, continuous wars for Israel, and campaigns controlled by the Donor class.

But few media organs are going to tell you that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Govt Insider Reveals Hillary's Murderous Past

 

Cynthia McKinney understands. She says:

"Under No circumstance, should any thinking voter voter for Hillary Clinton"

 

"I am extremely disappointed with black voters, who are bailing out Hillary's campaign,

when she doesn't deserve black votes"

 

Here's the article Cynthia McKinney spoke of Hollow Women of the Hegemon

https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/393286.html

 

This article is a call in honor of International Women’s Day warning the people not to follow the woman leader who stands by her hegemon. This is a call for new women leaders who will stand with men to resist and defend the people against tyrannical governments posing as democracies. This is a call to us all, women and men, to end the oppression of globalized debt based economics that funds all wars, profiting from state terror while fomenting all states of terror. The interlocking directorate of rulers who employ women leaders, such as Margaret Thatcher, Benizer Bhutto, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, Corazon Aquino, Madeline Albright, Janet Reno, Condoleezza Rice, or Hillary Clinton, do so because they are loyal supporters to the men of the hegemon reveling in the greed, wars, invasions, occupations, and the New World Order. As such, they along with their power hungry husbands, fathers and brothers must be stopped.

Today’s women in power are focused on power for themselves “in solidarity” with the men of the hegemon. They neither represent the liberal feminists “ethic of care” or the revolutionary women’s demand for a radical reordering of society. Instead they have joined the front lines in the agenda to, as Kissinger stated, “depopulate” the women, men and children of the planet. They are power hungry women who want to be included in the process of “add women and stir” to the list of acceptable positions of power and profit of the hegemon.

Let us begin with Condoleezza Rice...

. . .

Hilary Clinton was asked about the "ticking time bomb" scenario, and said in skillful doublespeak, "I have said that those are very rare but if they occur there has to be some lawful authority for pursuing that," she responded. "Again, I think the President has to take responsibility. There has to be some check and balance, some reporting. I don't mind if it’s reporting in a top secret context. But that shouldn’t be the tail that wags the dog, that should be the exception to the rule."

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright says, referring to a half million children dead in Iraq, more children than died in Hiroshima, “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s one thing I don’t understand about the 2016 presidential race:

 

Why is the media so determinately anti-Bernie Sanders?

 

 

kuz they are playing with the public

 

it is always going to be devil's advocate to get the public as riled up as possible

 

 

 

"I am extremely disappointed with black voters, who are bailing out Hillary's campaign,

when she doesn't deserve black votes"

black, white, yellow, orange... can we please grow up already

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"black, white, yellow, orange... can we please grow up already"

 

Cynthia (and others) are working to get this point across.

 

When Hillary thinks she is entitled to the black vote because she is a woman (?)

It is ridiculous

 

White women are the most entitled creatures on the planet.

What does she really have to offer to blacks, apart from platitudes she does not believe in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will THIS win the election for Hillary?

 

womancard.jpg

 

Ever the shameless opportunist, Mrs. Clinton pounced on Trump’s comments after his running of the table in last Tuesday’s Acela primary that put the two of them on a collision course in the general election. Hillary not only glommed onto the Donald’s pointing out that her political bread and butter is the exploitation of her womanhood but immediately turned it into a nice bumper sticker slogan of “Deal Me In”. To top it off, her official website kicked off a promotion offering cheesy pink Hillary for America “Woman Card” to any suckers willing to make the required donation – and they will flock to do so.

 

> http://downtrend.com/donn-marten/team-hillary-deals-the-woman-card-from-the-bottom-of-the-deck

 

A useful idiot?

635933087832946506-EPA-epaselect-USA-ELE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re Bernie.

 

Isn't he from a Vermont political background?

 

Worth looking into the politics in Vermont. Very different than the rest of the US.

 

http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/09/24/montpelier-mythbusters/

 

Q: Is Montpelier, Vermont the only U.S state capital without a McDonald's?

 

A: Another Montpelier urban legend proves to be true. Believe it or not, McDonald's and its competitor, Burger King, have failed to enter the great capital of Vermont (although they are located in nearby Berlin, VT).

 

Montpelier is dedicated to keeping things local and has kept McDonald's out for the time being. In fact, until 1996 the superstore, Wal-Mart, was kept out of our state as well. Incidentally, Montpelier, VT is also without an airport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/04/28/seymour-hersh-hillary-approved-sending-libya-sarin-syrian-rebels.html

 

 

 

Hersh has implicated Hillary Clinton directly in this «rat line». In an interview with Alternet.org, Hersh was asked about the then-US-Secretary-of-State’s role in the Benghazi Libya US consulate’s operation to collect weapons from Libyan stockpiles and send them through Turkey into Syria for a set-up sarin-gas attack, to be blamed on Assad in order to ‘justify’ the US invading Syria

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting... about Hersh's revelations.

 

I reckon there are many people who have some serious dirt on Hillary, and are awaiting the right time to unload it

 

I cannot see Hillary being elected

 

Hersh is no saint - I see him as controlled opposition, run by Zionists.

And maybe some powerful zios do not want to see HRC as President

 

From the article:

 

"Then, came this question from Hersh: «Why does America do what it does? Why do we not say to the Russians, Let’s work together?» His interviewer immediately seconded that by repeating it, «So why don’t we work closer with Russia? It seems so rational». Hersh replied simply: «I don’t know». He didn’t venture so much as a guess – not even an educated one. But, when journalists who are as knowledgeable as he, don’t present some credible explanation, to challenge the obvious lies (which make no sense that accords with the blatantly contrary evidence those journalists know of against those lies) that come from people such as Barack Obama, aren’t they thereby – though passively – participating in the fraud...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and are awaiting the right time to unload it

Sigh....

 

unfortunately that's another reason why shes such an attractive candidate to the status quo.

 

because "unload" means

"use as leverage to get what they want out of her".

and

"make sure she doesn't do anything stupid, like.. her job".

 

And conversely.

Why Trump and Sanders are such unattractive candidates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×