Jump to content
drbubb

9/11 Truth: Coming to a Billboard near you

Recommended Posts

This sounds so very real to me:

 

"Trump has been recruited on a suicide mission to save America"

"He's ready to take on Bill Clinton"

 

DONALD TRUMP IS A 9/11 TRUTHER!!

 

Published on Dec 30, 2015

Alex Jones talks with Dr. Steve Pieczenik about what he thinks abouot donald trump and why the establishment fears him.
http://www.infowars.com/william-krist...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scvms are terrified - that can only be good news...

Tried? better

Convicted? Better still

Hung? justice done, maybe

 

Trump could hang Bill Kristol over 9/11

By Kevin Barrett on December 27, 2015

Terrified Kristol wants to run 9/11 perps Cheney or Jeb in 3rd party bid

US neoconservative commentator William (Bill) Kristol is terrified that if Donald Trump becomes president, he might try the perpetrators of the 9/11 coup d’etat for mass murder and high treason, an American scholar and researcher says.

 

Veterans Today Editor Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Scientific Panel for the Investigation of 9/11, made the remarks in an interview with Press TV on Sunday while commenting on a recent interview by Kristol, the founder of the Emergency Committee for Israel, an American neoconservative group associated with the Israel lobby.

In an interview with ABC News on Saturday, Kristol called for a third party run in the event Trump wins the Republican Party nomination for the presidency of the United States.

Kristol, the founder and editor of the political magazine The Weekly Standard, also said Trump will not be nominated by his party, adding that he will begin to fall behind his rivals if loses in the Iowa state primary elections.

Dr. Barrett said “Kristol is the dean of American neoconservatism, an ultra-Machiavellian Zionist, political-intellectual movement that brought us the 9/11 coup d’etat..

==

> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/12/27/trump-hang-kristol/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Jim Stone

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethish8.html

 

Many of you know by now that a tower in Dubai burned. American MSM is burying to what extent it burned. The Mexican press did not. The damage was massive, and the fire burned with intensity for a full 18 hours. Now onto why I got banned:
Obviously people are now comparing this to the WTC. Here is the ammo you need to kill the trolls, This is a main killing point I never heard covered by anyone, and it tripped a ban:
The WTC did not have bare exposed metal beams. All beams, even those that were and were not covered in concrete as well as fireproofing, had 5/8 inch spray on fireproofing with an R value of 3. An R-value that high would prevent any piece of metal in the WTC from increasing in temperature by more than 25 degrees Celsius even if put directly in a perfect fire for the length of time the fires burned. This is due to the thermal mass of the beams, the heat of the flame, and how well an R value of 3 will block heat. R3 is better than most picnic coolers, which have a typical R-value of 2.5.
The big Achilles heel in the entire 911 ruse that everyone overlooked is that ALL supports in the entire building had fireproof thermal coating on them, and the larger beams had both a very thick thermal coating AND concrete blocking the heat. The large center beams most likely never even had a temperature rise of even 5 degrees in the short time between the jet impacts and the controlled demolition.
You should not feed the trolls with the burning temperature of jet fuel and give them the foothold assumption that the beams actually reached that temperature, clearly, obviously, there is no conceivable way they did and it is far more rational to state that due to the fireproofing and the ability of the metal to conduct the heat away from the flames, NO piece of metal anywhere in the WTC got too hot to touch. And even if the fireproofing got scraped off a few of the beams, the beams missing it would not get sufficiently hot in that short of a time, and would have many many others nearby to take the load even if they did. Bash bash and bash the fact home that people were alive standing on the burning floors as well, there was clearly no inferno to begin with, only a smouldering smoky mess.
My mentioning the fact that the fire proofing alone makes the official story a certified ruse is triggering bans, they are deeply afraid of people knowing that, ARCHIVE AND POST!. If you mention this web site or quote text from here or you will get auto banned on most forums now so you have to say it your own way. But however you do it, from now on, don't mention the burning temperature of jet fuel, instead focus on how massive the beams were, and the fact that they had a thermal coating on them that would have prevented them from heating up in any meaningful way at all in such a short time.
The jet fuel combustion temperature is their straw man, START RIPPING THE GUTS OUT OF THAT STRAW MAN by constantly referring an R-value of 3, the massiveness of the beams, and the short time the fires burned. Constantly quote "25 degrees Celsius max temperature rise with all factors considered" (in your own words, and circumvent the censor bots by saying 100 degrees, 50 degrees, the real number is approximately 25 degrees but you don't need it that good to make a point,) the key is to get around the censor bots and to stick in everyone's memory that due to the thermal coatings no actual metal could have ever even gotten too hot to touch in such a short time according to the official story.
Other good attacks on trolls would be the craters in the basement well after it was all cleaned out, and the melted metal found in the basement. Relentlessly attack the trolls, asking them how jet fuel can melt steel, because all they can do is prove that under ideal combustion circumstances it might weaken it a little but they can't for a minute state it would ever melt. Drill Drill and DRILL HOME the huge pools of melted metal, and ask them how that happened when jet fuel can't do that, and then say, OBVIOUSLY THERE IS MUCH MORE TO THIS STORY THAN ARABS AND JETS, THE COMPLETELY MELTED POOLS OF STEEL PROVE IT. Please dear troll, explain the totally molten metal, all details please!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, it will fall.

 

(Wait a minute, does Larry Silverstein own it, or not?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"the fire burned with intensity for a full 18 hours"

 

Can you provide details of this 18hr inferno, afaik the fire started around 9pm and had been extinguished by midnight.

Still, it burned longer and hotter than either wtc1/2.

An important aspect of wtc7 is that NO structural changes to building regulations in regards to fire safety

have been changed .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also point out it wasn't completely engulfed in flames

it looks like the exterior caught fire and spread externally rather

than internally.

There is no need to exaggerate other fires to expose the wtc7 lie,

all 3 tower destructions are impossible if fire was the cause (as claimed)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://mikephilbin.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/author-and-film-maker-peter-valentino.html

 

.... author and film-maker Peter Valentino has put together a to-camera piece called the Papamundi Files, NYC Final Conclusions in which he discusses the meat & potatoes of his Kissinger Konfessional polemic-omentary Papamundi and the 911 Mechanism or what we know as the Great Magic Show of September 11th 2001.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  1. Altimometer January 1, 2016 at 11:42 pm

    Dr., did you catch the video of the burning high rise in Dubai? The building looked fully engulfed yet did’t collapse.

    • Preston James, Ph.D January 2, 2016 at 12:26 pm

      Of course it didn’t collapse. It was built to internationally accepted fire-codes. And it didn’t have micro-nukes glued to the inside of it along the elevator shaft every ten floors and bigger ones in the basement that were detonated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just after 1:20

 

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=36660

 

Countless videos exist of Tower 1 at the World Trade Center falling in free fall like a controlled demolition. Countless arguments exist pointing out the presences of thermite, possible nuclear bombs in the basement, high energy dissolvelment beams from above and etc, to try and prove the case. The proof is in front of everyone however and no one seems to have noticed.

At about half way though the following video from RMN yesterday, a powerful explosion occurs at the start of the collapse as shown below.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGlwsB4zDG8

 

 

From the comments:

 

at 1:24, the building started collapsing from the bottom first, then the top. But the fires were at the top so how come the bottom of the building buckled first ? keep your eye on the burnt-out/exploded section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no way the bottom buckled first, there's zero movement of the building below the damaged section.

What I hadn't seen before was the camera shake 10secs before collapse started which may indicate some

form of energy release. If nukes were responsible why the difference in collapses between 1,2 and 7?

1+2were top down while 7 started at the base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All 3 had underground demolition nukes which were used, but 1 & 2's demolition were supplemented by micro-nukes placed at intervals up the towers. I believe they were much taller than building 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer Judy Woods explanation but have to admit the Russian nuke dude sends me to sleep so its hard to follow

One issue with the nuke theory I have is how did the firemen survive in stairwell B?

They were on the 2nd/3rd floor and the main nuke was in the bedrock

Explain that and I would take it more seriously.

Having watched them speak I am 100% convinced they are genuine and not crisis actors

these men were there, these men survived a 500k ton 108 storey building collapse on top of them

and survived a nuke below them?

No way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They got out before the nuke went off.

There were other explosive devices there.

I seem to remember an article in VT saying they got a CIA whistleblower who claimed that they put vending machines in the WTC which were filled with explosives

If you are that interested, go read the series of articles in VT from May 2014.

There was a recent article which complied the list but if you search for 'nuclear education', you may get the list that way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They claim they were in the towers, in stairwell B

they say they heard the collapse above them and

when it was over they looked up and saw sunlight.

The tower was gone when they were finally rescued

so by implication you are saying they lied.

You suggest I read VT which has admitted they "have to" lie

on a regular basis.

Revealing free energy technology is a danger to those that

profit from oil which includes Russia+ Usa.

Who is more likely to lie?

Those firemen , a man who admits lying or people who profit

from covering up the truth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VT was given an intel dump by the Russians starting from May 2014, Then other intel agencies joined the bandwagon - the French, Brits and the UN. The info was initially offered to Wayne Madsen but he did not publish them. So VT was chosen.

 

The intel dump was massive. It seems the IAEA had agents on the ground at NYC within a day (or they may have been in situ when 9/11 happened - my memory is crummy). Basically, all nuclear explosions have a unique signature and from the data collated at that time, these IAEA inspectors were able to pinpoint exactly who owned the nukes. It came from the US nuclear stockpile. There was a genuine official 9/11 investigation that came out in 2003 which has been suppressed. I think it was conducted by the guys at Sandia Labs. This was made available to the VT guys who published the non-sensitive parts

 

The info is shocking. It seems that when the cold war ended and there was an agreement between the US and the Soviets to decommission their nuclear warheads and the Americans send their surplus warheads to some facility to remove the plutonium and convert that into suitable fuel for power stations. What happened instead was that there was wholesale theft going on. I think it was at Los Alamos? The warheads went in the front door, so to speak, and the Bush crime family has their guys there who removed the nuclear pits and sent them out the back door, smuggled in some special trucks which eventually made their way to Israel where they were re-engineered to be re-used in weapon delivery systems. Israel then sold these to any old Tom, Dick and Harry nation who had the readies - such as South Africa, N Korea etc. There was a little problem with these re-engineered nukes - they had a use-by date which probably wasn't disclosed to the buyers.

 

If you are truly interested in what happen during 9/11, you should research the material published in VT from late May 2014. I'll dig up the list of the articles for you some time if you are too lazy to do this yourself but I'm very tired at the moment. I'm sleeping almost around the clock these days, especially these past 2 days.

 

Caveat: the above is based on my memory which is not perfect plus while I browsed through some of the articles, I did not read them all and certainly not every word.

 

VT is a talking shop for people from the intel agencies. There is good info there but again, there is questionable info. It's up to you if you wish to look at that website. You should bear in mind that mind that nobody knows the full truth and even if someone genuinely wishes to put out only the truth, he may still not do so if only because he too could be fooled by the ocean of disinfo in which we swim. Just look at the Fulford reports. I think the guy says what he thinks is correct but even then, he publishes some utter crap at times. If you insist that the source of info must be perfect before you pay any heed to the info provided, then you probably also believe in the existence of Santa Claus and the tooth fairy

 

On balance, I think VT did publish genuine 9/11 material sent to them by disillusioned nuclear specialists from various intel agencies. The governments are run by very corrupt people who use and abuse their own intel services, and have no hesitation killing their own men to cove up their tracks.

 

The intel guys are fed up and according to Preston James, they have banded together to expose their own governments' corruption. Have a look at his articles on the intel cowboys eg

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/05/11/the-intel-cowboys/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/20/very-very-bad-things/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention how that info relates to the WTC

Some of the re-engineered nuclear pits were used in the nuclear devices which were detonated up in the twin towers.

They supplemented the built-in underground nuclear demolition charges which were put in when the WTC was constructed

The reason New Yorkers were not dropping like flies from acute radiation poisoning was due to the nature of the nuclear devices used up in the towers plus the planners used weather engineering to create a cyclone at that time.

This cyclone sucked up the radioactive particles and then dumped them over somewhere like Greenland - I think I heard Duff say this during one of the many radio shows he did but it may also be in the articles over in VT

This story is really, really big.

I recommend you poke around VT for the details.

People have died putting this story out - I think the nuke expert at VT has since gone to meet his maker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention how that info relates to the WTC

Some of the re-engineered nuclear pits were used in the nuclear devices which were detonated up in the twin towers.

They supplemented the built-in underground nuclear demolition charges which were put in when the WTC was constructed

The reason New Yorkers were not dropping like flies from acute radiation poisoning was due to the nature of the nuclear devices used up in the towers plus the planners used weather engineering to create a cyclone at that time.

This cyclone sucked up the radioactive particles and then dumped them over somewhere like Greenland - I think I heard Duff say this during one of the many radio shows he did but it may also be in the articles over in VT

This story is really, really big.

I recommend you poke around VT for the details.

People have died putting this story out - I think the nuke expert at VT has since gone to meet his maker

 

That actually gave me a belly laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like sci-fi but that's because the black ops technology is not generally known. If people had any idea of what the wealth extracted from them has been used for, these guys will be strung from the nearest lamp post by the next day. Catherine Austin Fitts has estimated the wealth extraction to be in the region of $40T. Think of the budget that Reagan had for his star wars program. Trillions went in and there has been nothing to show for it .... publicly. CAF has been trying to find out where the money went and she concluded it went off planet. Listen to some of the more exotic shows on the black ops and shadow government. Try some of the stuff put out by Joseph Farrell.

 

Get used to some of these ideas as a lot of info is coming out. Otherwise, you'd have trouble adjusting - Alvin Toffler's Future Shock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The list is at the end of this article

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/22/911-fraud-official-time-of-death-call-it/

 

We will continue pulling our full 9-11 update series together for posting on each new article so readers have them in the chronology they were published. It’s been one hell of a ride…Jim W.Dean

 

Background articles:

The latest:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/08/neo-cia-torture-report-incriminates-dick-cheney/

New 9-11 story, 2014 Archive:

1) veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/
2) veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed/
3) veteranstoday.com/2014/05/21/doc-submitted-by-russian-intel/
4) veteranstoday.com/2014/05/22/constructing-the-nuclear-child/
5) www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/31/vt-nuclear-education-series/
6) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/01/nuclear-education-series-dimona-classified/
7) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/01/vt-nuclear-terrorism-education-series/
8) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/
9) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/18/vt-nuclear-education-as-the-hammer-drops/
10) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/24/vt-nuclear-education-mossadn-korea-links-mox/
11) veteranstoday.com/2014/06/24/nuclear-roundtable-americas-nuclear-arsenal/
12) veteranstoday.com/2014/07/07/officials-site-thermo-nuke-in-911-demo/
13) veteranstoday.com/2014/07/08/vt-nuclear-education-fission-based-thermobaric-weapons/

Additional supporting material on 9/11, nuclear physics and disclosure issues:

  1. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/13/vt-nuclear-education-anti-gravity/
  2. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/14/neo-mini-nukes-and-m16-the-economy-of-war/ (must read)
  3. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/15/vt-nuclear-education-nukes-in-iraq-confirmation/
  4. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/24/vt-flexing-its-nuclear-muscle/ (must read)
  5. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ (must read)
  6. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/30/vt-nuclear-education-tactical-nuclear-warfare/ (must read)
  7. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/30/vt-nuclear-education-early-reactors/
  8. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/01/iaea-investigators-audit-reveals-us-not-iran-the-problem/ (must read)
  9. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/03/vt-nuclear-education-history-of-mini-nukes/ (must read)
  10. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/08/vt-nuclear-education-answering-the-hype/ (must read)
  11. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/14/vt-nuclear-education-a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-atom-smasher/ (must read)
  12. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/15/vt-nuclear-education-lenr-neutron-distribution/
  13. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/17/einsteins-theory-on-magnetic-buoyancy-and-its-application-to-the-space-time-continuum-or-gravity/
  14. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/21/vt-science-fuel-cell-technology/
  15. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/05/vt-science-haarp/
  16. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/16/fusion-junk-science-for-rubes/
  17. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/17/neo-nuclear-threats-enter-the-mainstream/ (must read)
  18. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/18/vt-science-nasas-low-energy-fusion-voodoodoodoo/
  19. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/10/the-connection-between-aurora-and-black-triangles/
  20. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/31/jeff-smith-on-the-upcoming-able-danger-leak/
  21. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/09/vt-nuclear-education-japan/
  22. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/03/vt-nuclear-education-detonations-and-deceit/
  23. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/28/deconstructing-christopher-bollyn-and-steve-jones/
  24. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/11/330695/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/

 

There are also reports of weather manipulation, two hurricanes, which helped dispel radiation that would have wiped out half of New York instead of simply killing the thousands who have died “mysteriously” of “toxic pixie dust” so far and the 70,000 reported by the New York Daily News as having cancers any idiot knows are radiation sickness.

Again, with weather manipulation, we enter a new ground. VT has published on weather manipulation on several occasions, successfully predicting impossible storm behavior. We have seen typhoons blocked and hurricanes created and in one instance, the use of an energy weapon to stop a storm blasting a hole 30km into the earth’s surface causing a quake and nearly a tsunami. We will begin publishing these documents too if we have to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a thread on 9/11 in the Fringe but it's grown a bit unwieldy

 

http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/index.php?showtopic=9754&page=28&do=findComment&comment=296578

 

Brian
Yes, we need to ask these questions. I have always liked Bollyn but then again, I have a pitbull for a pet.
Here is how I see it. Bollyn is ether extremely foolish, attacking me as a way of defending his book, which financially isn’t worth it or..
He is serving an agenda. As all the “pros” are behind a nuclear solution including the mass of docs and witness statements, the hard science. Russian intelligence, the IAEA, all have come forward.
This should have given Bollyn a chance to write a new book. Instead, he goes “gatekeeper” when real evidence that could hang Israel shows up.

I have the guy that matched the nuclear pits for the bombs used. He ties Israel to this and can name names.
Bollyn has “the Mossad did it.”
Bollyn is an investigative reporter yet the only Mossad ties are from Khalezov, who is a “nuke guy.”

After the US fiasco in the Ukraine, Russia has been dumping intel to burn their enemies in the US. I am not the only person they went to. Rense got real docs, published them, but didn’t get all of it. Madsen had it as early as 2006 but got the story wrong…when so many others of us did also.
WE put it all out there. The intel community, the military all have it now. They understand totally and have come onboard with us.
We are now holding all the cards. Anyone who thinks they can go into a courtroom in the US and put “the Mossad” on trial is insane or a “shill.”
Prove me wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×