Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drbubb

Wisdom about Women ... and Men / the MGTOW mentality

Recommended Posts

I feel sorry for Jim Stone that he should feel such strong negative emotions about women.

It reminds me of that Michael Tsarion talk about women who procreate with the fallen angels or whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for Jim Stone that he should feel such strong negative emotions about women.

It reminds me of that Michael Tsarion talk about women who procreate with the fallen angels or whatever.

 

He doesn't describe the behavior of the women I know best.

 

Perhaps he has had too much contact with psychopathic women

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he has a very meek, docile, submissive and appreciative wife - she is very likely to be Oriental, possibly Japanese. It seems that these disillusioned western men go East for the wives they want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he has a very meek, docile, submissive and appreciative wife - she is very likely to be Oriental, possibly Japanese. It seems that these disillusioned western men go East for the wives they want.

 

How do you suppose that works out, CMJ (haha)

 

I do think Western women are programmed by the Media and the culture to have impossible expectations.

How many of them are actually happy?

 

Western men are better at saying and thinking ("Forget that!") to the media programming. But not all break free.

 

We now reach a point where people are realizing to save Western culture, they may need to make a total break from Zionist programming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Western media and culture have totally brainwashed many girls and women. Men too. It's all part of the control over society. It's hard for me to compare what I see here with what is going on in the East as I haven't been back for many years. The last time I was in KL, my lawyer and accountant were telling me sad stories of the kids being imbued with Western culture.

 

Men and women should be equal even though they are different. When a man has such strong views about women, there's something not quite right there. I regard it as a sign of a psychic or mental or emotional imbalance. It's not healthy. He is to be pitied. This ranting is a manifestation of his anger and pain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Western culture needs to look in the Mirror, and see how it has been badly corrupted by a Zionist influence.

 

Heinrich Palmgrin is "on the case"

 

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/03/RIR-150309.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for Jim Stone that he should feel such strong negative emotions about women.

 

I don't see that. I see that he is writing about how women are manipulated (as are men in other ways). That should not be confused with negative view of women per se.

 

I suspect you are female.

 

I think he should have cited the book though....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, what I am saying is that he truly believes what he read in that Jewish book ie the FIRST AND FOREMOST important issues for women were 1. IMAGE and 2. MONEY. Children actually are not nearly as important. If you can provide women with a way to have money and a good image, you can use that to control them and get them to commit the most heinous evil.

 

And what the controllers are doing is to appeal to this innate desire which they have identified.

 

Would you not agree that this is a negative view of women?

Why pick on women when status (that's really what image is) and money are concerns of many people, regardless of gender?

For example, status and money are paramount with the Chinese, especially one's standing in the community

And I'd venture to suggest that the men are much more sensitive to loss of face than women but maybe Dr B will weigh in on this

 

One can then argue that although this is a trait found in many people, the controllers have decided to concentrate on a subset of the population (women) because they are more easily manipulated and through controlling women, they get the multiplier effect on the rest of the population ie men and presumably the next generation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, what I am saying is that he truly believes what he read in that Jewish book ie the FIRST AND FOREMOST important issues for women were 1. IMAGE and 2. MONEY. Children actually are not nearly as important. If you can provide women with a way to have money and a good image, you can use that to control them and get them to commit the most heinous evil.

 

And what the controllers are doing is to appeal to this innate desire which they have identified.

 

Would you not agree that this is a negative view of women?

Why pick on women when status (that's really what image is) and money are concerns of many people, regardless of gender?

For example, status and money are paramount with the Chinese, especially one's standing in the community

And I'd venture to suggest that the men are much more sensitive to loss of face than women but maybe Dr B will weigh in on this

 

One can then argue that although this is a trait found in many people, the controllers have decided to concentrate on a subset of the population (women) because they are more easily manipulated and through controlling women, they get the multiplier effect on the rest of the population ie men and presumably the next generation.

 

It is not a 'negative view' to state weaknesses that might be exploited. All of life on earth has weaknesses in one form or another.

 

As to the latter. The 'controllers' use all available tools. Certainly not just focused on women.

 

We are no longer the victims once we understand this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Karen's right on the mark here !

 

Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat) Presentation at the 2013 NY Libertarian Convention

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If men are "on strike", maybe it is because so many environments are now hostile towards them

 

2014 Men on strike: Helen Smith interviewed by Forbes' Jerry Bowyer

 

"Women today want special privileges, and no the (financial) responsibilities"

Universities ("Girlington"?) are becoming an environment unfriendly to men

 

"This is a cultural war... and men are not used to fighting the bureaucracies that support women"

Men are not boycotting the American dream, they are boycotting the American woman's dream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Men aren't Stupid : the Marriage CONTRACT is too unequal !

 

(and every institution is lined up on the woman's side)

 

... as Helen Smith explains:

 

George Clooney, Benedict Cumberbatch and Eddie Redmayne may have all taken the plunge recently — but they are a diminishing band of brothers, for the number of men marrying in the West has plunged in recent decades.

The state of matrimony is not just ailing. It is dying out faster than a mobile phone battery.

According to the Office for National Statistics, marriage in Britain is at its lowest level since 1895. In 2011, there were just 286,634 ceremonies — a 41 per cent free fall from 1972, when 480,285 couples tied the knot.

For an army of women, Mr Right is simply not there, no matter how hard they look for him. And the reason? When it comes to marriage, men are on strike.

Why? Because the rewards are far less than they used to be, while the cost and dangers it presents are far greater.

‘Ultimately, men know there’s a good chance they’ll lose their friends, their respect, their space, their sex life, their money and — if it all goes wrong — their family,’ says Dr Helen Smith, author of Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood And The American Dream.

‘They don’t want to enter into a legal contract with someone who could effectively take half their savings, pension and property when the honeymoon period is over.

To put it another way:
Every marriage is now a Threesome : with the woman already married to the loathsome State,
and the woman the and State are very likely to team up on the man, and then he is really screwed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another opinion

Where did all the good men go?

 

If they mean: The man with a better job... car, income, etc.

Guess who took his job?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Husband Store

A store that sells new husbands has opened in New York City , where a woman may go to choose a husband.

The entrance has a description of how the store operates:
You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are six floors and the value of the products increase as the shopper ascends the flights. The shopper may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you cannot go back down except to exit the building!

So, a woman goes to the Husband Store to find a husband.

On the first floor the sign on the door reads:
Floor 1 – These men Have Jobs

She is intrigued, but continues to the second floor, where the sign reads:
Floor 2 – These men Have Jobs and Love Kids.
‘That’s nice,’ she thinks , ‘but I want more.’
So she continues upwards.

The third floor sign reads:
Floor 3 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, and are Extremely Good Looking.
‘Wow,’ she thinks, but keeps going.

She goes to the fourth floor and the sign reads:
Floor 4 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Good Looking and Help With Housework.
‘Oh, mercy me!’ she exclaims, ‘I can hardly stand it!’

Still, she goes to the fifth floor and the sign reads:
Floor 5 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Gorgeous, Help with Housework, and Have a Strong Romantic Streak.

She is tempted to stay, but she goes to the sixth floor, where the sign reads:
Floor 6 – You are visitor 31,456,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store.

PLEASE NOTE: To avoid gender bias charges, the store’s owner opened a New Wives store just across the street.
The first floor has wives that love sex.
The second floor has wives that love sex, have money and like beer.
The third, fourth, fifth and sixth floors have never been visited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha.

Very good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Young King Arthur was ambushed and imprisoned by the monarch of a neighboring kingdom. The monarch could have killed him but decided to offered King Arthur his freedom provided he answered a very difficult question. King Arthur would have a year to find the answer but if he got it wrong, he would be killed.

The question was: What do women really want?

King Arthur accepted the monarch's proposition. He returned to his kingdom and asked everybody but no one could give him a satisfactory answer. Most people told him to consult the old witch, as only she would know the answer. The price would be high, since the witch was famous throughout the kingdom for her exorbitant prices.

On the last day of the year, King Arthur was forced to ask the witch. She would give him the answer but he must first agree to her price. The old witch wanted to marry Gawain, the most noble of the Knights of the Round Table and King Arthur's closest friend! King Arthur was horrified. She was a hideous hunchback with only one tooth, smelled like sewage water and often made obscene noises. He had never met such a repugnant creature. He turned her down.

Word of this proposal reached Gawain who went to see King Arthur. Gawain told the king that nothing was too big a sacrifice compared to King Arthur's life and the preservation of the Round Table.

 

So the wedding was proclaimed and the witch answered the question:
What a woman really wants is to be in charge of her own life.

Everyone instantly knew that the witch had uttered a great truth and that Arthur's life would be spared. And so it was. The neighboring monarch spared King Arthur's life and granted him his freedom.

What a wedding Gawain and the witch had! Arthur was torn between relief and anguish. Gawain was a proper gentleman and behaved with great courtesy. The old witch put her worst manners on display. She ate with her hands, belched and farted, and made everyone uncomfortable. The wedding night approached.

Gawain, steeling himself for a horrific night, entered the bedroom. What a sight awaited him! The most beautiful woman he had ever seen lay before him! Gawain was astounded and asked what had happened. The beauty replied that since he had been so kind to her when she was an ugly witch, she would be her horrible, deformed self for half the time, and she would be a beautiful maiden self for the other half. Which would he want her to be during the day and which during the night? What a difficult question!

Gawain began to think of his predicament:
During the day a beautiful woman to show off to his friends, but at night, in the privacy of his home, an old spooky witch? Or would he prefer having a hideous witch by day, but at night a beautiful woman to enjoy many intimate moments?

What would you do?
What Gawain chose follows below, but don't read until you've made your own choice.
...
...
...
Noble Gawain replied that he would let her choose for herself!

Upon hearing this, she announced that she would be beautiful all the time, because he had respected her and had let her be in charge of her own life.

So what is the moral of this story?
If you don't respect women, things are gonna get ugly!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.

"If you don't respect women, things are gonna get ugly!"

I suppose that is how it will go with Hillary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Six Reasons Why Men Are Avoiding Marriage, with Helen Smith, Ph.D.

 

Men are opting out of marriage - it is a high risk proposition,

and single life is better than ever.

 

"If we want more men to marry, it needs to be a more attractive proposition"

 

Marriage 'Unsafe' for Men, Says

 

Women have changed the rules so much... men are waking up to the reality:

They do not get a fair deal in marriage, nor in divorce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Helen Smith wrote the book because "Men aren't allowed to speak up"

and she wants a different deal for men... especially lower status men

 

Dr Helen Smith Explains Why Men Need To Boycott Marriage

 

"look at what the culture is doing to men... the solution is to have fair rules"

"college is a woman-dominated place"

 

Generation Porn? The Real Reasons Why Men Are Shunning Marriage

 

M.-Man:

"There are many divorces... and they are mostly initiated by woman"

(who have nothing to lose... it would seem)

 

(posters there):

Women have more rights in the court and legal representation. If your a male, you will be financially devastated and possibly lose your children. Women are not held accountable in the court for their behavior. The facts remain the court system is anti-male and anti-father. As a male you will be educated to just how much of a second-class citizen you are. My challenge to all young men is "DO YOUR RESEARCH, LEARN WHAT HAPPENS TO MEN DURING DIVORCE."

Women are married to the government now. They are well suited for each other. Get over it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Men have "wised up" and rejected a clear Bad Deal

 

MGTOW: Marriage is all but dead! 70% of men 20-34 not married in US

 

Too bad, ladies. Better renegotiate, if you want the Contract

(Or maybe they don't care, since the State looks after then pretty well.

Unfortunately, it is the children that suffer.)

 

Comment-Lord Hawkeye 1 month ago

Every country that let feminism have their way now has birth rates below sustainable levels. When the older generation dies off and the tax revenues start drastically decreasing, politicians are gonna turn on the feminsts like starving jackals. Oh, what feminists? You actually thought politicians cared about you? Gullible infants... Like everyone else, they only care about you to the extent that it gets them more money and more power. Once you become a liability, they will throw you to the wolves. The poor are about to learn that hard lesson when the welfare state runs out of money.
We hit 70% in the US; were now tied with Japan. Wow!
MGTOW: Marriage rate plummeting, commence victory dance!

What happened to the Man-with-a-job that women are looking for?

The state, and the economy hasn't treated them very well

 

Comment- MatrixQ 6 months ago

So it's "women don't owe you sex", but at the same time, it's "men owe women marriage"? Funny how that works...
+MatrixQ Lol naw I got your point, I was just wording it that way to show how stupid the double standard is. It is evil for us to expect to be owed sex, but it is not evil for them to enslave us for life. In fact, it's their "right" apparently...
Mainstream society knows why we are staying single. They are playing dumb. They know that
A)Society has always shunned single men
B)The government has no qualms about destroying men
C)Women want backing from the government yet act like we men don't know that
D)Society is running on vagina worship
E)Women want to do whatever they want and still want men to get with them i.e. wanting to be choked and beaten but want to be able to cry rape to save face.
F)The massive amount of lives thrown away for the sake or "civilization" running on lies.
G)Men are getting no such incentive to marry and no governing power nor women can offer anything. The thing about a gynocentric society is that such a society wants to have its cake(destroy the lives of many men) and eat it too(expect men to keep being lambs to slaughter).
This should be the #1 comment! Yes, they ARE playing dumb. They have rigged the game against men in every way and then try to shame men for not playing that rigged game in which we can only lose. The only thing that's changed is that men are starting to wake up and laugh at their shaming attempts. When the laws change (not in our fucking lifetime) we can talk about what other options we might have. Until then, mgtow is the only way for men to avoid being raped and destroyed by women and the government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When will we start hearing about THIS problem?

 

High income women do not want to commit to lower-income men?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×