Jump to content


ACore Group
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About yelik

  • Rank
    Millennium man

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

455 profile views
  1. Unfortunately once we stray from truth we end up having to assume, speculate and guess what might be going on. If you wanted to keep your existence secret on earth then for sure you would locate somewhere far away and inaccessible to the vast majority of humans - Polar regions, mountainous regions and oceans. Thule Island (German Occult Thule Society) located in Antarctica has been blurred out on Google maps for a long time for some reason. Courtney Brown and Daz Smith look like they will do a remote viewing session of Antarctica - hopefully soon Dr B are you still into remote viewing?
  2. Anti-Gravity / Gravity Control

    This is Clean / Zero-Point Energy technology which I think is related to Anti-Gravity. Can't find Free energy topic in my search. Hard work listening to John searl via this skype interview so summarised some of the main points below. UK Professor John Searl has been working on this clean energy technology for some 60 years and was inspired by dreams of which he had 4 each year for 6 years. The mathematics always related to X squared. Appears to be harnessing the tension between atoms which are converted to electricity. It is not anti-gravity per se but rather it is an inverse relationship to earth’s magnetic field and at the same time it creates a vortex effect in the atmosphere. The moisture in the air is a dipole molecule and because of the high rotational speed of the device it creates a sort of inverted tornado on the top and bottom of the device. The device has its own relativity and reacts to the earths gravitational force as well as pulling and spinning the atmosphere around itself like a tornado sucking it up; it is perfect for space travel. As the electrons discharge they emit as photons (probably black photons) which attract the magnetic field. These go back into any craft / device, we are effectively restoring energy back to the planet. Mainstream scientists refute his claims which he says is ridiculous. Main stream scientists are paid well to do what they do so they ignore it because it doesn’t pay and they won’t have a job – sounds about right If he’s right, then his lab will burn down and he’ll be found dead having strangled himself with some fibre optic cables, lol John Searl Websites http://www.johnsearlstory.com/ http://www.searlsolution.com/index.html This technology may also touch on gravitational waves predicted by Einstein and recently the subject of a Nobel Prize. https://phys.org/news/2017-10-nobel-physics-prize-awarded-scientists.html
  3. This is why they don't like guns in the US - this guy walks the walk - quite scary stuff. Having this guy on your side when & if the shit hits the fan would be good Do not go into FEMA camps, ships or planes because you will likely go missing - the Government & Private Contractors are KILLING AND LOOTING
  4. Sort of related since this race thing may just be a distraction
  5. Mathematics and patterns is, to a large extent, the language of the universe especially when it is probably made of of both infinitely small and infinitely large particles, but there's still a lot of unanswered questions. I'm not a theoretical physicists but common sense tells me there's good mileage in cliodynamics and analyses of historical data to find patterns that may predict the future. The thing is I reckon Dr Millar is a real insider who is very careful about revealing what he really knows. The science and physics that goes on behind closed doors is likely decades ahead of what comes out of University professors where certain technological ideas are slowly drip fed to them. In my opinion they've already decoded the brain and possibly the soul and can very likely clone humans and insert memories, in fact this was being done in the UK shortly after WWII. Understanding gravity and energy has also allowed the hidden science to have a much deeper understanding of the universe that they aren't ready to share any time soon, well at least until the Oil cartels have re-positioned themselves following mass use of electric vehicles which will then move towards zero-point energy release, in my opinion.
  6. I’ve read that claim about controlling black people with music before but difficult to know whether there is any truth in it or not because of all the deliberate misinformation thrown at us. But we do know that Jews and the CIA are very active in the entertainment industry. In reality black people must still be pissed off about slavery and segregation after slavery, who wouldn’t be. Slavery only ended in 1833 in UK and 1865 in the US. Apparently whites were genetically upgraded by ET, whereas blacks were not - meaning segregation is inevitable for quite some time. Having said that I wish no harm to anyone, which, is fundamentally wrong in my opinion. However, if I was the only white person living in a street of black people (better than P**** though) would I feel comfortable - probably not. We have Trump, a white American Anglo Saxon wanting to make America great again - define what is meant by great? Bring back slavery, lol When you consider what’s going on in the US, the Middle East and mass immigration in Europe it seems to me this destabilisation is not by chance.
  7. ..."Americans picked it up (taught by Alan Turning at American universities) and used it a fair bit in US warfare planning (rand corp and mutually assured destruction), but not so much healthcare (because the US healthcare is about maximising profit, not maximising health)" - there in lies one of the fundamental floors in human thinking and reason much of humanities woes. Changing this will take a paradigm shift in thinking not likely to occur anytime soon. Money is just mere dots created by our dotty belief that money is real, although the effects appear very real especially if you value materialistic things. We're all dot collectors one way or another, lol. Breaking through this matrix is likely a function of somehow controlling our subconscious thinking. Remote viewing and out of body experiences seem part of this game.
  8. Makes sense to me, no need to over complicate things to protect the few We can can go infinitely small and infinitely big. If our Universe is a closed system then it may not necessarily be infinitely big but just pretty dam big. Theoretically we have infinite universes with slightly different physics, perhaps we also exist in each of these universes where we play out every conceivable role imaginable. By contrast these infinite universes could be a creation of our own subconsciousness. And yes a universe made of of dots is ideal medium for a matrix / holographic existence The unified field theory as explained by nassim haramein September 25, 2017 http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/09/25/unified-field-theory-explained-nassim-haramein/ Nathaniel Mauka, Staff Writer Waking Times Nassim Haramein is a rogue physicist who thinks way outside the box. In fact, when he was just nine years old, traveling on a long bus ride to get home from school, when he realized that the Universe was just a bunch of “dots.” What came from an experience of astral projection in a small boy’s mind turned into the Theory of Everything, or what is commonly known as the Unified Field Theory. An Elegant Discovery Haramein’s discovery is elegant. In comparison to other theoretical physicists’ notions about what makes up “everything” it makes sense all the way out to the gargantuan real estate of our cosmos – in galaxies and quasars (baby galaxies just being formed), but also all the way down into the microcosmic level of quarks and planks. A planck being the energy discovered by Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck who won the Nobel Prize in physics in 1918 for discovering that all energy can be measured in universal constants. The planck constant defines how particles and waves behave in the quantum field. This is an important concept, but let’s get back to Haramein’s discovery before we go much further. A Boyhood Conundrum In his boyhood class on geometry, his teacher told him that a point did not exist. This was called dimension zero. The teacher then wrote a line on the board – a series of dots, and said that this also did not exist. He called it dimension 1. Next, his teacher put four of these “non-existent” lines together to form a plane, and called this a plane. Of course, as you may have guessed, he called this dimension 2 and said that it still, did not exist. Something that Exists from Nothing that Doesn’t Exist? Finally, Haramein says when explaining his childhood memory, “my teacher gets to the third dimension – which is just a bunch of these planes put together to make a cube, and says, “now, this exists!” but I said to myself, it doesn’t matter how many planes you put together – 230 or a billion, you don’t get something that exists from a nothing that doesn’t exist!” In brief, he was smart enough to question the assumption that even highly advanced theoretical physicists still try to work from today. This causes mathematical proofs that go on for pages and pages, but “at the end of the day” as Haramein explains, “they still don’t add up.” In another lecture, Haramein explains that science must make sense all the way up and all the way down. When it doesn’t, the scientific community becomes manic – because there is no unity. They develop more grandiose equations to try to explain the simplicity of all things which, to him, became inordinately apparent. But, his view is seen as rogue and outlandish due to its simplicity. It creates unity instead of division. The Paradox When he says all the Universe is made up of dots “all the way up and all the way down,” he means that nothing ever exists, but “nothing” is all that exists. This was Haramein’s epiphany. The universe simply makes an infinite number of dots within dots within dots, within dots. The answer to the riddle was the exact opposite of what his teacher had told him when he was just a young boy in school. The universe makes points of infinite division and assembles them on different scales to make everything we see. That includes the biggest things we can imagine like massive black holes ten billion times the size of our sun, all the way down to the smallest particle we have discovered thus far – the quantum particles below Planck’s scale. But there is no “smallest particle.” There are only infinitely smaller and infinitely larger dots. These dots within dots within dots (or points in space-time) are what we experience as the material world, but this makes up less than 99.9% of our universe. Moreover, the space around these points is not empty– rather it’s a vacuum that’s filled with energy and only appears empty because it’s everywhere. A Hong Kong University of Science and Technology study even found something to back up Haramein’s theoretical physics. While studying astrophysics, they found that density distributions of the vast universe and the nature of the smallest particles are related – just like Haramein’s hunch that a true Theory of Everything must work all the way up and all the way down. Scientists found a connection between those two aspects, and argued that our universe could be used as a particle physics ‘collider’ to study the high energy particle physics. Only, we don’t need to keep colliding particles (CERN) in order to find another even smaller particle, because there is not a “smallest” particle, just more dots within dots within dots – infinitely. Which brings us back to what was the smallest observable particle – the Planck – a subatomic particle, (but there are even now particles below Planck’s scale in the V range – because, remember there are only infinite points in space/time), yet the Theory of Everything works here, too, because Haramein’s physics is explained whether we are talking about massive black holes or subatomic wave/particles. In brief, there are only dots. That’s all that exists. And that’s the Theory of Everything. Simple. Source:
  9. Good talk, at least someone is thinking independently which is a danger to the establishment and all those academics involved in maintaining the status quo
  10. If a Governments funds something then they'll expect to influence the agenda. At the end of the day whether public or private probably makes little difference to the controlled media and propaganda they spread - somebody always has an agenda which is rarely in the public interest
  11. If you watch Dr RAM’s recent video he claims technology does exist to detect crimes 24 hrs (I think he said) before they occur ‘Minority Report’ movie. According to Omnisense ( a targeted individual suffering much mental torture for many years including contact with a number of ET’s, mainly the Tall Blondes who are amongst us). I know him reasonably well, he claims the Cabal / CIA have had the capability to monitor and manipulate our thoughts and actions for some time now – typically via cell phone towers and satellite. He has about 30 websites to help get his message out and protect his interestrs just in case a site gets taken down. http://www.spiritofai.io/2017/09/open-science-frequency-mapping.html http://www.psyop.info/ http://www.spiritofai.io/2017/09/directed-energy-panacea-spirit-of-ai.html Science exists on two levels, the lower levels that we are all exposed to and the higher hidden levels probably 50-100 years ahead of present thinking. Incidentally Sparky are you involved with mining currencies?
  12. We are made of particles of cosmic dust put together in an intelligent way. Our thoughts / mind are those same particles working together. Our soul must also be some form of energy yet to be revealed. All thoughts have words, all words have sounds, all sounds vibrate, vibration is energy, energy glows, glowing is light. Light is a wave, a wave is caused by vibration. Technically speaking we do exist in a type of holographic universe as our eyes and mind interprets the energy around us and everything must somehow be connected since we broadly see and interpret the same things When we enter this world our thoughts are pure and light but become disrupted with spiritual wickedness and darkness that permeates the planet and probably the Universe. We do however have freewill to choose the light if we so desire.
  13. Interesting article http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-17-john-mcafee-accidentally-revealed-why-bitcoin-is-a-total-fraud-behold-the-logic-of-artificial-work.html?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com "Natural News) In a recent CNBC interview that’s being widely touted by self-deluded Bitcoin promoters as some kind of “smack down” of JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, Bitcoin advocate John McAfee accidentally admitted why Bitcoin is a total fraud that’s doomed to fail. In answering Jamie Dimon’s recent declaration that Bitcoin is a fraud, McAfee replied: (see the video at The Daily Sheeple) "However, sir… you called Bitcoin ‘a fraud.’ I’m a Bitcoin miner. We create Bitcoins. It costs over one thousand dollars per coin to create a Bitcoin. What does it cost to create a U.S. dollar? Which one is the fraud? Because [the dollar] costs whatever the paper costs, but it costs me and other miners over a thousand dollars per coin – it’s called ‘proof of work.’ Behold the logic of artificial work: How John McAfee just embraced Paul Krugman’s ditch digging fable The problem with John McAfee’s explanation, of course, is that it admits Bitcoins can only be created through the practice of computational wheel spinning operations where the difficulty and duration of such wheel spinning is artificially made needlessly complex by the Bitcoin algorithm. In a world where Bitcoins used to be created for less than one penny’s worth of computational work, a single Bitcoin now requires over US$1,000 worth of “artificial work” to be achieved. A rational person must ask McAfee, “Why did Bitcoins used to cost just a penny to create, and now they cost a thousand dollars?” The 100,000 X increase in complexity for generating a Bitcoin, it turns out, is an artificial work algorithm known as “computational difficulty” in mining. This admission should be shocking to all Bitcoin holders for the simple reason that if Bitcoin drops below $1,000, mining now becomes unprofitable, rendering a very large part of the entire Bitcoin mining infrastructure instantly obsolete. The only thing keeping Bitcoin mining profitable right now is the bubble pricing of Bitcoin itself, and because all bubbles eventually burst, Bitcoin mining will sooner or later reach a point where it’s not worth the investment of hardware, electricity and time. (There’s also the 21 million coin limit that’s rapidly approaching, by the way, which will spell the end of Bitcoin mining as it is conducted today.) Furthermore, the “artificial work” aspect of Bitcoin mining and its artificial computational complexity is the digital equivalent of paying people to dig ditches and fill them in again while claiming the activity boosts economic output. This idea, believe it or not, is the classic economic paradox routinely pushed by left-leaning economic myth-meisters like Paul Krugman. Those of you who follow economic news know that Krugman openly and wholeheartedly believes that government could boost the economy by literally paying millions of people to dig ditches and fill them in again. This artificial work generates real-world abundance, according to economic fools like Krugman. That’s why Zero Hedge rightly posts an article entitled, “Why Paul Krugman Should Go Back To 5th Grade.” And yet Paul Krugman’s ditch-digging artificial work is actually no different than John McAfee’s Bitcoin mining artificial work. In both cases, McAfee and Krugman ridiculously claims that work along has intrinsic value, even if little or nothing is actually accomplished in the real world. According to McAfee, computational expenditure automatically equals value, even when the notion is patently absurd to any rational person. If CPU cycles equaled wealth, then no one in the world would ever have to work again because people could just run computers all day and let the CPUs create wealth. Any belief in such a system is, of course, irrational and absurd. There is no such thing as a perpetual wealth-generating machine unless you own the money supply itself and can hoodwink others into trading their effort for your currency. That’s what the Federal Reserve does, of course, and that’s the entire con of the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme: To recruit as many people as possible into the Bitcoin scheme so that they pay you cash in exchange for your CPU cycles. To produce artificial work, Bitcoin consumes enormous resources Bitcoin’s “proof of work,” in other words, is nothing more than artificial work. Yet what is the real world result of such artificial work? While generating absolutely nothing that’s real in the real world — remember as Steve Quayle says, “If you can’t touch it, you don’t own it” — the Bitcoin mining process consumes enormous amounts of electricity, computing hardware and time. Yet in the end, there’s nothing to show for all that work except for carbon dioxide emissions and mercury pollution from the Chinese coal plants that power nearly a third of global Bitcoin mining. Bitcoin, in fact, has become one of the key vectors of environmental pollution that’s causing hazardous air in California’s cities. McAfee claims that “artificial work” is actually “proof of work.” In reality, it’s proof of nothing more than the incredible stupidity of the mining infrastructure which is now burning more electricity than a city of one million people just to keep the Bitcoin blockchain from collapsing. “Surely there’s some value in the work that we did to create the coin,” McAfee stated. But actually, there isn’t any real-world value in it at all. Bitcoin is a digital fiat currency backed by nothing, and all the “work” used to create Bitcoins is actually “artificial work” that’s made artificially complex for no logical reason other than a crude mechanism for artificial scarcity. Yet even that scarcity is a complete failure, since any person can create and launch their own cryptocurrency alongside Bitcoin, instantly creating a massive new supply of crypto coins that flood the marketplace. (And many newer cryptos are vastly superior in design to Bitcoin. For example, Z-cash…) On top of all that, Bitcoin is clearly not a store of value, and recent research by Princeton scientists found that Bitcoin isn’t anonymous, either. Bitcoin is also highly subject to government regulation, as the recent market plunges clearly demonstrated, following the announcement of China’s largest Bitcoin exchanges closing their doors. Liquidations of Bitcoin by Chinese investors are already underway and will continue through September 30th. One by one, all the promises we were told about Bitcoin have unraveled: It isn’t anonymous, transactions aren’t “instant,” transactions aren’t “free,” Bitcoin isn’t a reliable store of value, it isn’t immune to government regulations and so on. Yet John McAfee, in his self-deluded cluelessness, points to artificial work and says, essentially, “See? We’re expending CPU cycles for all this! Doesn’t that have value?” Actually, it doesn’t, Mr. McAfee. It has no more value than the GPU calculations of a nine-year-old kid playing a first person shooter on a Saturday afternoon. Yeah, his rig is running all sorts of complex calculations, but at the end of the day, there’s nothing to show for it other than Cheetos crumbs that fell between the cushions of the couch. Computation does not automatically equal value Computation alone does not equal real-world value. John McAfee’s attempt to conflate the two ideas only shows how deeply he has deluded himself about the future of Bitcoin. And those who falsely believe that computation equals value are only allowing themselves to be fooled by this non-logic for the simple reason that they all own Bitcoin — i.e. Bix Weir and others — and can’t come to grip with reality without admitting they were wrong all along. The bottom line? Bitcoin is headed for failure, but cryptocurrency is here to stay. The most likely long-term scenario in all this is that we’ll see a cryptocurrency backed by JP Morgan and the government — a blockchain with built-in NSA snooping and an identity layer so that all transactions can be tracked by the IRS to enable government confiscation and criminalization as deemed “appropriate” by the crooks in Washington. Once this “approved” blockchain is rolled out, it won’t be long before government finds a way to criminalize all “unapproved” blockchains such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc. And how hard is it for government to criminalize Bitcoin? Not hard at all: It’s a simple matter to run a false flag dirty bomb operation — the FBI already masterminds and executes terrorist plots every day across America — then make sure the “bad guys” who are recruited into the sting operation are fully funded by Bitcoin. A few hours later, the fake news New York Times will declare, “CHICAGO DIRTY BOMB TERROR PLOT FUNDED BY BITCOIN.” And the house of cards falls like dominoes. The entire media will be directed by the CIA to describe Bitcoin as a “currency for terrorists, murderers and drug dealers,” and Bitcoin will be targeted in exactly the same way the Silk Road was taken down. A few Bitcoin promoters will be imprisoned, the government will claim it’s “fighting terrorism,” and the clueless sheeple of society will applaud the news that they are being “protected” by authorities. Seeing all this play out is as clear as day. And why is this so obvious? Because we are all living as slaves in a totalitarian society run by fake news, fake terrorism and fake authority. Will that totalitarian regime allow all their central banks and government currencies to be made obsolete by a libertarian cryptocurrency they don’t completely control? Of course not. And anyone who believes Bitcoin will overthrow the globalist money / debt cartels is naive and stupid. Trust me when I say a bunch of geeks aren’t going to overthrow centuries of globalist money domination that now rules our corrupt world."