Jump to content

mSparks

Members
  • Content Count

    5,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About mSparks

  • Rank
    Tri-Millennium Guru

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,911 profile views
  1. I'd rather listen to fingernails being scraped down a blackboard than some Americunt crackpot. Russian accents much more pleasurable tones. Do you have a point or are you just joining her making random noises? Nothing you have said so far remotely changes a conclusion that Carter Page working for the both the Russian government and members of the Trump administration posed a security risk worth investigating using all available tools. So if thats what you are going for, you are failing miserably. Oh really? what possible evidence can exist that working for the both the Russian government and members of the Trump administration doesn't pose a security risk worth investigating using all available tools. Would love to read it.
  2. "steele dossier we now know was a bunch of malarky" Yeah, that was my question. What exactly do you think has been shown to be untrue? Carter Page wasnt investigated because Trump had underage hos whizzing on his bed. Confessions over beers are still confessions. And it "was" all supposed to be secret. plus Page had his defamation case thrown out.
  3. https://themoscowproject.org/players/sergeimillian/
  4. innocent until proven guilty. Just like Roger Stone was. Unlike the court system we do not have to assume innocence. And guilt by association generally works well. So unless you have something specifically untrue you can now put your finger on, such as something in: What you are suggesting doesn't really hold water. Especially when Mueller only concluded there was no proof Trump knew the facts in that image. (never [officially] traced the rosneft money to him personally - although dems are now including bribery in the impeachment case, so still time for that to come up)
  5. They all belong in prison. But that wasn't the question. How do you think the fact stating Carter Page was connected to Paul Manafort inflates the reasons to investigate Carter Page? This is what you want people to believe? The report you are quoting specifically says its impossible to say either way. What lie. exactly. could have meant the fisa warrant would not have been issued against Page?
  6. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.pdf Since the only mention of Page in the above dossier is that he was connected to Manafort. And this was true. And Manafort is in prison now. How exactly do you think this document "inflated" the reasons to investigate Page?
  7. Trump impeachment: Democrats unveil formal charges The first article revealed by committee chief Jerry Nadler accuses Mr Trump of abuse of power and the second accuses him of obstructing Congress. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50731010
  8. AGW, Global Warming. Probably all BS. This has been a topic that pops up over and over again, it basically went away for a decade, mostly because everyone who was actually paying attention at the time realised they were really being lied to. A long, long thread on one of the sites I used to frequent (now sadly passed away) I documented my efforts to recreate the science behind the “Man Made Global Warming” claims (before the hadley CRU debacle), and how I went through the phases of skeptic, to “huh maybe they are right” to, “omg this is all BS”. A recent push to claim “AGW is a real thing” inspired this post, everything I post is available to people who want to try it for themselves, I will assist anyone who wishes to do so. I’m not a climatologist, no one is funding this, it was a pet (Christmas) project, that went a bit to far. (although that will need me to update it to use the new, incredibly undecipherable temperature dataset, since the NOAA changed the file format from highly undecipherable format they were using when I made the graphs below, and for that you will have to pay me) An anonymous poster on one of the comments sections really summed up my current feeling, I recreate that comment here in full, because it is really an excellent summary of my current feelings on the matter: I would add to that, that from the numbers I have seen, taking the assumption man is adding heat to the earth as true – this may very well be keeping us from entering another ice age – NO THANKS!!! I’ll start my part with one of the most compelling graphs (the only one here not made by me) I ran into during those discussions that really hit a home run: That is a graph, made by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, from 2006, that documents the sea level over the last few hundred thousand years, light yellow on the zoomed in lower graph are the ice ages. My questions to AGW proponents Why were sea levels 10 meters higher than they are now if this is the hottest we have ever been? We are [hopefully still] coming out of an ice age, why are you in such a hurry to send us back into one? ___ How did I get here? Well, back in 2007/2008 everyone around me was in an AGW frenzy, governments were slapping huge taxes on energy consumption, every week was some new story, that I personally had a very hard time believing in (NASA releasing pictures comparing like winter 1997 with summer 2007 getting posted by her majesties Big Black Cock media (BBC) really got my BS meter screaming), and saying “I’m not sure I believe it” was heresy, there’s zero debate they said. So I broke the “AGW problem” into three steps. The earth is getting warmer We are causing the earth to get warmer The earth getting warmer is a problem that can and should be fixed. ->Can’t have three without one and two. Well, I’ve a ton of data science under my belt, I don’t need to take anyones word for it that the earth is getting warmer, I can go to the data and see for myself. At the same time I was developing a load of financial analysis tools (made good money on the financial crash thanks to them, so in that sense you can say this research paid dividends, even though the graphs I am about to put here never made it out of the little bubble we were discussing them in) I’ll skip the various revisions I went through, and just go straight to the end. First, I downloaded the temperature global station readings dating back to 1877. Next, I used a delauney tool to interpolate the temperatures between the stations, this has the benefit of minimising the rising temperatures from urbanisation, but in the end I don’t think I used this – too hard to get an average…. What I did instead was put all the stations into small “bins” by latitude, this gave me, for each month, the “average” temperature of a sliver of a latitude, (ring around the earth), this worked well and produces the (highly detailed) graph: Here the vertical axis is latitude -> from -90 to 90 and the horizontal axis is month, one pixel wide for a month, one pixel high for 1 degree of latitude. red is hot, blue is cold, and green is no stations in the bin. Notice how there is a lot of missing data at the poles early on, the temperatures at the poles have simply never been recorded, more on this later. There is to much missing data there to really do much with, but we can make some assumptions to fill in the gaps. By treating each month as a single data set, we can fit a curve to the data to estimate the temperatures we dont have. That looks like this: vertical axis is tenths of a degree (i.e. 100=10 degrees Celsius), horizontal axis is latitude This gives us a near perfect dataset to work with. This is the same format as the raw data, with one addition, the spots around the middle are the estimate of the sun azimuth (the latitude the sun is highest in the sky, the point on the curve where rate of change equals zero) This then went through various stages that basically agreed with much of the “earth is getting warmer” hypothesis (the “huh maybe they are right” phase), until I got to that sun azimuth in more detail. The northern hemisphere has more land than the southern hemisphere. Therefore when the sun is shining down on the northern hemisphere, global temperatures are hotter. So after much effort to improve the results, I finally ended up with this graph That is the change in latitude of the azimuth in the sun “predicted” by everything you just saw….. i.e. the sun moved from -4 degrees south in 1877, to 1.5 degrees north in 2008. Now, there are many ways to interpret this graph, maybe the earth really is wobbling, and that wobble is changing average temperatures, maybe the lack of temperature readings at the poles is biasing the results (my preferred explanation), but the conclusion is clear to me at this point, the errors we have here are to big to measure tenths of a degree or even a degree change over 200 years, and any trend is never going to be statistically significant. And this is “the best data there is”, there are other data sources but they are even more unreliable and unproven than this. So yeah, there is debate, Hadley CRU manipulating the data to hide the medieval warm period was a real thing, and scientists chasing grant money from the oil companies invested in alternative energy, and governments wanting more reasons to tax the hell out of everything we do have almost certainly corrupted this field to the point where the truth is indiscernible from the BS. Since then, Australia had some fun, introducing, then abandoning carbon taxes, and all the corruption that went with them, and China ignored it all and catapulted itself to be the new world leader in everything. WELL DONE.
  9. new credit crunch:Trump and Epstiens banker at deutsche officially suicided at 55yo.
  10. More likely hiding the fact that the couple that bought the baby smuggled her in because they had to go all the way to Guatemala to find someone who both hadnt been sterilised and was willing to give up their baby.
  11. Demand all they want. Just like a sitting president a member of the British monarchy cannot be indicted. Unlike a sitting president they cannot even be impeached. That is however a regime change war I would support.
  12. After murdering Diana for saying what they were doing was wrong. Too little Too late. and wtf is this shit. Err no. For starters the lot of them should be in prison for benefits fraud. Scum Scum Scum Scum Scum of the earth. A national disgrace.
  13. yup. plus the Jersey Orphenages, Albania and the jimmy saville connection. One great big group of powerful friends doing whatever they want. aka ye olde newspeak. http://forumslide.theborgmatrix.com/2017/04/26/newspeak/ “national security” = “The right of the head of state to fuck anything that moves”, (and probably a few animals that have stopped moving, necrophilia would be a serious national security issue) But I think maybe you missed the fact that the person you debunked last time and the person being talked about by the ABC and BBC hosts this time (same organisation, doing damage control for its owners) are one in the same person. Saying "i dont believe it, its fake news" isnt a debunking. its a facilitation. BTW. when you are logged out this forum hasnt updated for a day or two.
  14. la la la and i suppose you believe him? Any reason you feel like skirting over the details? scumbag. https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-48927942 From left, Donald Trump and now-wife Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell pose together at Mar-a-Lago 12 February 2000 https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/07/08/watch-donald-trump-and-prince-andrew-meet-up-in-london-ahead-of-friend-jeffrey-epsteins-arrest/amp/ One month before wealthy financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on new sex trafficking charges involving underage girls, two of his famous one-time friends — Donald Trump and Prince Andrew — appeared to have a friendly time together during the president’s official state visit to the U.K.
×