QUOTE (Carlton @ Mar 11 2010, 11:43 AM)

As of 5-10 years ago trade as a percent of US GDP was only 12% - America was largely self-sufficient. I think the US is still the best positioned country to pursue autarky.
America imports $1.5 trillion worth of goods. $430 billion in consumer goods, and $160 billion in autos and auto parts - those are both strategically irrelevant, as we also build autos domestically and the imports are of no military value.
However, we import $370 billion in capital goods and $460 billion in industrial supplies. This represents part of America's lost industrial base; but we still have the know-how, so this industrial base could be rebuilt in a timely fashion.
I pick the USA.
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-...elease/exh8.pdfAs far as an end game goes, I've been thinking something similiar. You have to ask yourself how stable and solid is the growth in the "emerging" economies. Too many people are thinking of the currencies of the "decadent" west blowing up, but what is more likely to happen, in an era of globalization, is capital will reverse back to the central funding currencies... the currencies which have some history behind them. Decoupling might come at a later date, but for now currencies are all inextricably linked... for better or worse. I doubt the [post] developed economies will suffer some inflationary holocaust, but will most probably find money to be very scarce. People will value it more, and there will be those with it and those without it. Population density might be a crucial factor here; those populations which enjoy a less crowded existence might still maintain a reasonable standard of living by simply growing their own food. Those stuck in the cities might feel the squeeze.